[kaal2009]

Any other questions, children?
(Don't be distracted by attempts of C.I.A.-RAW operatives here to derail the thread with irrelevant posts).

About how Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, I have said the following on this board which I am bringing together with the dates:-

"January 11, 2009: For country A to deter country B with its nuclear weapons, country A has to be able to deliver its nuclear weapons to country B. Everyone knows Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to India. But the country that is currently carrying out twice weekly attacks on Pakistan's territory is the United States. How can Pakistan deter the United States? Even without Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), it is not difficult to think of ways Pakistan could deliver half a dozen nuclear weapons to the United States' coastal cities such as New York and Washington. This thread is meant to explore ways in which Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, the knowledge of which would deter the United States.

January 14, 2009: Any one who has an 'understanding' with a foreign power for attacks on his own country's territory is a slave. As I have said in another thread, both India and Pakistan are such slaves of the white man.

I have said that the drone attacks are the start of a campaign by the United States to occupy and recolonise the subcontinent. Therefore India has to worry about the drone attacks as much as Pakistan and India has as much responsibility to stop them as does Pakistan.

Since the attacker is a nuclear power, stopping the drone attacks has to include the possible use of nuclear weapons. "Why do we need to deliver nuclear weapons to the US?" Because the United States is attacking your territory and it is a nuclear power. Since the drone attacks are as much a threat to India as they are to Pakistan, India will have to stop them if Pakistan will not.

Most Pakistanis would understand this. RAW has some operatives on this forum with Pakistani identities. Since RAW functions as a branch of the C.I.A. against India (and Pakistan), it tries to stop any discussion of how these countries could defend themselves against the United States. I don't know if you are one of those but post # 2 ... [in an earlier thread] is by a RAW operative who registered after I started this thread and then posted something to try to stop any discussion of how Pakistan could deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States the knowledge of which will deter the United States from attacking Pakistan. Only someone who thinks that the white master has the right to do any thing he wants to his Indian and Pakistani slaves will object to such a discussion.

January 15, 2009: RAW is not the only intelligence agency posting on such boards. So does the C.I.A. This S-2 person is from the C.I.A. Both RAW and the C.I.A. try to prevent any discussion of how countries like India and Pakistan can defend themselves against the United States.

I have said that the prospect of Pakistan delivering half a dozen nuclear weapons to its coastal cities such as New York and Washington will stop the U.S. and its drone attacks cold. It does not matter if the United States' air force is a hundred times more capable than Pakistan's or its army has equipment poor Asians can't dream of; that is the beauty of nuclear weapons; they are a great EQUALISER.

So let us consider how Pakistan could deliver nuclear weapons to U.S. coastal cities. One way it can do so is by cruise missiles mounted on naval vessels -- which could be submarines or surface vessels. Pakistan has nuclear capable cruise missiles which can be mounted on surface ships. The ship(s) will have to get within range of the target city. If the range of its nuclear capable cruise missiles is 500 miles, the ship will have to get within 500 miles of the target city. Note that this does not have to be a ship belonging to the navy. There is no reason why cruise missiles cannot be installed on merchant ships and properly camouflaged and launched when the ship gets within range of the target.

Pakistan also has ballistic missiles of various ranges that are nuclear capable. Such missiles CAN be launched from surface ships, even merchant ships, from specially designed launching platforms and camouflaged/hidden till they get within range of the target.

What are some of the other possibilities? Now is the time to get creative."

Much of what I have said in the posts above about India applies to Pakistan as well: increasing the range of long-range ballistic missiles by doing without most of the the extra weight of the bells and whistles of counter-measures, precise guidance, etc. given the present state of anti-ballistic missile defences of the slave-masters; a lot more focus, of time and resources, on long-range nuclear armed missiles capable of hitting the slave-masters of the world than on tanks and fighter planes that can be used only against other slave countries or, even if used against the slave-master, will not bring military victory over him, etc.

Note that, for India, I am saying a first strike on the slave-master is what is needed, not deterrence. Pakistan may be content by deterring the slave-master, which is looking for excuses to invade Pakistan on the pretext of dealing with the Taliban, etc. If the Taliban are now in Pakistan, that is because the slave-master has invaded and occupied their country; naturally, they have to go elsewhere in the subcontinent. It is obscene to call Afghan patriots defending their country against foreign invaders "insurgents". The United States claims a right to go all over the world and impose regime changes, culture changes and what not for its own "security"; the Taliban can't even go elsewhere in the subcontinent?