RAFALE VS F-16 BLOCK52+

[ANTIBODY]

---

---

RAFALE VS F-16 BLOCK52+

[ANTIBODY]

images available on simple google search - links not uploaded by me.. can be confirmed by my time of post

[ANTIBODY]

The HAF pilots of the F-16 block52+ and F-4E AUP had the chance to train with the Rafales M of the CHARLES DE GAULLE which visited Greece

4 Rafale M(marine) F1(T1) from the CDG aircraft carrier square-off against 4 F-16 blk 52+. A Greek Erieye was feeding info to the French ACC, and monitoring the simulated battle for the Greeks. The BVR tactics of the Frech were not impressive, and after some succesful and unsuccesful launches, the Greeks were in the "no-escape" zone of their AIM 120's. The Greeks had a high percentage of launches to downings, while the French percentage was lower, but with a higher range. The Rafales can also fire on 4 targets simultaniously, while the F-16 can fire only on 2. The Rafale can track 40 targets, with prioritizing. All in all, any advantages that the Rafale's have were deemed as marginal in this AA batle with the blk 52+.

Also said the French had a fairly serious problem with the mission computer, but that was the only problem. The capabilities of the radar to locate targets, and the ECM and ECCM suites are very impressive, capable of giving a complete view of the operational combat environment without AWACS. It can locate enemy radar signals to their precise location from over 200 miles away. F2 and F3 will have many vast improuvements from experience gained from the F1.

the Rafale has also had a chance to train against US ACC, with F-14's and F-18's, as well as the F-16's. The F-14 and F-18's were easy prey. Afgainst the F-18's, the Rafale's easily out-maneuvred the F-18. The US did not want to engage the French at BVR, not wanting to compare AIM-120's to Mica's.

---------- Post added at 05:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:27 AM ----------

the aircraft our boys faced were M version F1standard

the major points....

1)our lack of RWR..the French "aborted" most of the times we got a lock on them...we didnt ,coz we didnt know it due to the absence of such a RWR system..

2)the great performance of the AGP-68(V)9 we use...gave us the oportunity to spot the French from quite a long distance and coordinate our reactions...through the link system between our 52s..which lead to confirmed shots on 2-3 Rafales..
and receive an unconfirmed numbers of shots too ofcource...

3)due to the passive mode of the RBE2 its range is inferior to the active AESA,and HAF estimates that in terms of range it must not be superior to the AGP-(V)9

4)after the first co-training the French requested a second one ...to test their new gem...which is obviously flaterring to the crews and the performance of the 115CW

5)the ECCM of the 52s worked smoothely when the Spectra of the Rafale entered in ECM mode..

6)while the French pilots reported all the shots as a shoot-down, Greek side improved its performance placing the majority of its shots in the "noescape" zone of the Ammram,unlike the previous encounter..

7)in all,the Rafale showed a marginal superiority but with a large numbr of PK (low probability of success) shots,unlike the 52s...fewer shots but in the no escape zone..

8)one of our EMB-145H worked closely with the CDG carrier,testing its Link16 and Link11...After its take-off from its base,established a connection within 10 mins with the French carrier ...thus certifying its capabilities in netcentric ops ,something usefull other co-trainings with the French in the future

some info from the greek side

[ANTIBODY]

'' The recent excercise wasn't the first occasion for a HAF squadron to counter the Rafale. In 2006 the Rafale M from CdG partecipated in excercises with F16block52+ and F4E AUP. But the Rafale M of the time, were F1, a version centered in air-to-air role with somewhat limited capabilities. In the Aegean Gust partecipated Rafale F2, with improved air to air capabilities, including the data link between aircrafts of a formation, combined with FSO and data fusion...

... Both greek and french pilots flew as backseaters in each other planes. As for the engagements:

4 sorties occured in the morning and 3 in the evening of Tuesday in 2 vs 2 scenarios, in BVR. The greek aircrafts were B52+. On Wednesday 8 sorties with Rafale B in 2 waves (morning, evening), with the partecipation of 1 french pilot and 4 greek backseaters. This time it was 4 vs 4. The greek aircrafts were B52+, B50D, B30.
Something that appeared strange to the greek pilots, was that while according to the HAF policy the pilots were doing the last pre-takeoff check of their planes (Leak check), the French pilots were taking position on the runway without doing so.

The impressions of the greek pilots were variable, as is natural , and their observations quite interesting. The whole of the greek F16 pilots, found the cockpit particularly functional, although a bit small, as is used in all french aircrafts. Also, the best impressions left the glass cockpit advanced disposition. It is known that the high operational output of the Rafale is result of high performance, excellent behaviour and friendly MMI that adopts to the high workload in multirole missions. The existance of so many displays and the characteristical absense of analog instruments, was natural to make a big impression to the greek pilots, who apart the Falcon's MFDs, are used to analog instruments. Some in fact, told us that they would feel more comfortable, if some analog instruments have been kept as backups in cases of malfunction or failiure of the electric system. Of course it is certain that safety valves has been thought, while evolution indicates that full glass cockpit will dominate in the future, as will happen in the case of F35 too.

It is also natural to be impressed by the high situation awareness provided by the Rafale thanks to data fusion. The Rafale, as the greek pilots had the chance to see, can receive tracking data from RBE2, Spectra, OSF, IFF, MICA IR sensors and accompanying aircrafts, ground command and control facilities and AWACS, elaborate them and produce system tracking data (system tracks). These are superior to quality compared to the single data of the individual sensors. This data is then used for fire control and is shown in the central tactical display and can be transmitted to fellow aircrafts. So, at a glance at the tactical display, the pilots can see the position of targets that may be inside the radar cone or outside and even in the rear hemisphere, no matter if the radar is on or off!

Also, it was verified that OSF provides advantage in air combat. As the greek pilots observed, once the target is locked from the radar, its image is then displayed in the central display which facilitates very much the target identification even in great distances.A similar function is provided in the F16 by the Lantirn Pod in air to air mode, with the difference that the backseater can make a search independent of the radar. On the contrary on the Rafale, the OSF is primarily slaved on the radar.

The best of impressions left to the greek pilots the performace of the Rafale's self protection suite, confirming the french reputation in the sector since the time that HAF operated the ICMS2000 in the Mirage2000.

Small reprimands were made to some small but important details, like the fact of the abscense of a countdown timer in the HUD when a BVR missile is flying towards its target. The greek F16 pilots are used to such an indicator on the lower left of the HUD, indicating the "Time On Target" of the Amraam and the time remaining until the Amraam's autonomous seeker is activated. If the missile fails tracking, then the indication "Loose" appears over the locked target on the HUD and the pilot is aware that the shot has failed. Something like this wasn't found on the Rafale, leading to a difficulty in the interpretation of the BVR shots during the engagements. And this, because the French were regarding that after a certain range , a MICA shot was always successful. As a result, the arrival to safe conclusions, was problematic.

Beyond that, it was also commented positively the agility of the Rafale. Of course the greek pilots still think of the F16 as a particularly capable aircraft in dogfight.
In the air, the Rafale is very agile, but for the greek pilots the sense of flying was very different from that of the F16. It was commented as perfectly stable, with very good response in all speeds and manouvers. Very good impressions were also left by the automatic pilot as well as the ability of maintaining very low speed during approach, prior to landing.

... The Rafale certainly proved that it is a very capable aircraft in the hands of the excellently trainned french pilots who have battle experience. The encounter with F16s, gave the greek pilots the opportunity to measure the F16 capabilities against a 4th gen aircraft, while it showed yet another time that the level of HAF pilots is one of the best in NATO airforces.''

[ANTIBODY]

''...The greek pilots were called by their french colleagues as quite aggressive ("vicious") in the air and in no way they were easy targets, neither they reminded F16 pilots of other allied nations with which the Rafale had the chance to partecipate in some other excercises.

According to the french pilots, the Rafale prevailed in the air combat. Initially it was mentioned that in the first missions, the capabilities of the MICA missiles weren't correctly estimated by the opposite team. However, both sides made successful "shots" on the opponents.

The impressions of the greek pilots from the Rafale, were concentrated on the very good situatnio awareness , thanks to link 16 and the big touch screens. These were proved to provide very good image even in conditions of intensive sunshine, which often reduces visibility. In general, the cockpit layout, particularly impresses the greek pilots. Particularly interest also had the use of the Spectra, on the use of which, the french base some of their air tactics that have developed.

As far as the availability of the Rafale goes, in the duration of 18 sorties, it was proved high (94%), while only one flight was delayed and in one more there was a minor technical problem during flight.''

[500]

1)our lack of RWR..the French "aborted" most of the times we got a lock on them...we didnt ,coz we didnt know it due to the absence of such a RWR system..

What about AN/ALR-56M?

[Varad]

In US exercise over 10000 sq km Rafale beat F 16 blk 52 6-2 without the use of active jamming.

Rafale F2 vs F-16 Blk52 , 6-2 on the 1st day

[Zarvan]

In US exercise over 10000 sq km Rafale beat F 16 blk 52 6-2 without the use of active jamming.

Rafale F2 vs F-16 Blk52 , 6-2 on the 1st day

if that would have been the case Rafale would have been in use of many countries but countries still prefer F-16

[Black Widow]

if that would have been the case Rafale would have been in use of many countries but countries still prefer F-16

Look at the cost , F16 Blk52 priced half of Rafael... Apart from Price F16 has othe advantage
1. Good track record
2. Battle proven
3. Easily available spares.
4. Well trained officers are available... and many..

[SpArK]

if that would have been the case Rafale would have been in use of many countries but countries still prefer F-16

They are closing the production line and concentrate on F-35 is what last heard..

[John Doe]

The US did not want to engage the French at BVR, not wanting to compare AIM-120's to Mica's.[COLOR="Silver"]

I am not sure I understand this part:

They don't shoot actual missiles during these exercises, so how do they compare missiles?

[Lankan Ranger]

I think F-16 production line closes in 2013\14.

I don't think F-16 production line can survive beyond 2015.

U.S. will focus on the F-35, also U.S and it's international partners will buy F-35.

[Lankan Ranger]

Some where I saw an article Lockheed Chief executive Robert Stevens told The F-16 has been in production for more than three decades, also F-16's lifespan is nearing its end after a long run.

He also said demand for F-16 obviously narrow…..

[amalakas]

What about AN/ALR-56M?

unfortunately, due to disputes with the manufacturers of the system, the self protection suit of the haf F-16s has not been officially accepted.

I think hence not used.

[IND_PAK]

---

---

F -16 IN >>>>>>> F- 16 Block 52+
F -18 >>>>>>>>> F -16 IN
And India rejected both on the left side and choose Rafale, hence Rafale > F 18 >>F 16 Block 52+
Was that so tough to understand????