Pakistan Defence
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 54
Thanks Tree36Thanks

Engines used in different fighters




  1. #31
    MODERATOR ANTIBODY's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    where the wild things are
    Posts
    7,981
    Thanked
    8338 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters



    WS-10

  2. #32
    MODERATOR ANTIBODY's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    where the wild things are
    Posts
    7,981
    Thanked
    8338 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Jihad, Firemaster and Pfpilot thanked this.

  3. #33
    MODERATOR ANTIBODY's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    where the wild things are
    Posts
    7,981
    Thanked
    8338 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters


    credits houshagai/martian
    Jihad and Firemaster thanked this.

  4. #34
    MODERATOR ANTIBODY's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    where the wild things are
    Posts
    7,981
    Thanked
    8338 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    two (and half) different types of WS-10 nozzles. The lightweight ejector type for J-10, and the high-speed iris type for J-11 (incld. a modified, low-observable derivative of this for J-20).



    via milvipes

  5. #35
    JR. THINK TANK AhaseebA's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    1,409
    Thanked
    1462 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters



    1. J-10A with AL-31F engine.
    2. J-10B with AL-31F engine.
    3. J-10B with AL-31F engine.
    4. J-10B with WS-10A engine.

  6. #36
    THINK TANK pshamim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    248
    Thanked
    836 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    This may come as a Shock but WS-10 engines are not the copy of Russians but American engines

    There is a popular belief that WS-10 is a copy of AL-31 engine and I do not dispute them. But what US defence industry believes totally differes with the popular belief.

    Americans do not consider WS10 to be a copy of AL-31 but believe its origins are from US CFM56II engines. In 1982, the U.S. sent two of these engines to China for evaluation. Although this engine is a civilian, its main components - high-pressure compressor, combustor and high-pressure turbine - is identical to American turbofan F110

    The Pentagon was against sending of these engines because of fears that China could learn advanced technology of this engine. However, the then President Ronald Reagan's administration insisted on this deal, provided that the motors must be stored in special sealed containers and opened every 6 months for inspection by American officials. Naturally, the Chinese did not adhere to the agreements, and opened the engines apart and studied the components. Before the arrival of the Americans, they collected them. It was reported that the engines never returned to the U.S. because they "were burned in a fire.

    Thrust without afterburner is unknown, with the afterburner it is believed to be 132 kN. According to these characteristics, the engine is roughly equivalent to the American F110, used on F-15 and F-16.
    Last edited by pshamim; 08-23-2011 at 10:38 AM.

  7. #37
    FULL MEMBERS conworldus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    1,697
    Thanked
    1279 times
    Users Country Flag: Hong Kong Users Location Flag: Ecuador

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    The design core may be the same, but for China, the major achievement would be the ability to produce the type of materials for EACH part that need to sustain the heat, the pressure for many, many hours. This can NEVER be copied. This is why engine development is so hard because so much of it is just trial and error until you get it. And the testing period can be hundreds or even thousands of hours. The induction of WS-10 means that China now has the foundation to build next gen engines. This is an incredible achievement.

    Quote Originally Posted by pshamim View Post
    This may come as a Shock but WS-10 engines are not the copy of Russians but American engines

    There is a popular belief that WS-10 is a copy of AL-31 engine and I do not dispute them. But what US defence industry believes totally differes with the popular belief.

    Americans do not consider WS10 to be a copy of AL-31 but believe its origins are from US CFM56II engines. In 1982, the U.S. sent two of these engines to China for evaluation. Although this engine is a civilian, its main components - high-pressure compressor, combustor and high-pressure turbine - is identical to American turbofan F110

    The Pentagon was against sending of these engines because of fears that China could learn advanced technology of this engine. However, the then President Ronald Reagan's administration insisted on this deal, provided that the motors must be stored in special sealed containers and opened every 6 months for inspection by American officials. Naturally, the Chinese did not adhere to the agreements, and opened the engines apart and studied the components. Before the arrival of the Americans, they collected them. It was reported that the engines never returned to the U.S. because they "were burned in a fire.

    Thrust without afterburner is unknown, with the afterburner it is believed to be 132 kN. According to these characteristics, the engine is roughly equivalent to the American F110, used on F-15 and F-16.

  8. #38
    THINK TANK pshamim's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    248
    Thanked
    836 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Quote Originally Posted by conworldus View Post
    The design core may be the same, but for China, the major achievement would be the ability to produce the type of materials for EACH part that need to sustain the heat, the pressure for many, many hours. This can NEVER be copied. This is why engine development is so hard because so much of it is just trial and error until you get it. And the testing period can be hundreds or even thousands of hours. The induction of WS-10 means that China now has the foundation to build next gen engines. This is an incredible achievement.
    Material composition can easily be found by using chemical tests. Also the use and positioning of of ceramics based on temperature reading in different parts of the engine can be learnt when studying a proven design.
    Firemaster thanked this.

  9. #39
    FULL MEMBERS conworldus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SA
    Posts
    1,697
    Thanked
    1279 times
    Users Country Flag: Hong Kong Users Location Flag: Ecuador

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Quote Originally Posted by pshamim View Post
    Material composition can easily be found by using chemical tests. Also the use and positioning of of ceramics based on temperature reading in different parts of the engine can be learnt when studying a proven design.
    No sir. It is not easily found. Chemical test uses different acid to decompose the alloy but unless you know before hand what it is, it takes a long time to guess. Secondly, it is one thing to know the chemical structure, but it is entirely different thing to know how to get that structure and its physical conditions. Metallurgy is a science based on theory but also hugely on experience and system control. This is something you cannot copy.

    Now imagine going through the steps for hundreds of thousands of engine parts. Now that's a mountain of work! This is an incredible achievement.

    Think why India is struggling so hard with its Kaveri engine?
    nightcrawler and Roybot thanked this.

  10. #40
    FULL MEMBERS Beast's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,217
    Thanked
    1408 times
    Users Country Flag: China Users Location Flag: Australia

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Quote Originally Posted by conworldus View Post
    The design core may be the same, but for China, the major achievement would be the ability to produce the type of materials for EACH part that need to sustain the heat, the pressure for many, many hours. This can NEVER be copied. This is why engine development is so hard because so much of it is just trial and error until you get it. And the testing period can be hundreds or even thousands of hours. The induction of WS-10 means that China now has the foundation to build next gen engines. This is an incredible achievement.
    This is also the reason why WS-15 (next generation) engine is moving so fast. The foundation of modern turbofan has build up. Now is just putting up the jigsaw puzzle. From huizigheng, WS-15 project is going very smoothly.

  11. #41
    PROFESSIONALS Chogy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    2,249
    Thanked
    3924 times
    Users Country Flag: United States Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Very true. You may know that an engine element is 35% iron, 40% nickel, 10% titanium, etc, but it's not simply a matter of melting all these metals together. It is how the component is formed that matters.

  12. #42
    FULL MEMBERS Tin Man's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In my head.
    Posts
    432
    Thanked
    328 times
    Users Country Flag: France Users Location Flag: Germany

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Metallurgy- Not a point function. Rather, a path function.

    Amen.

  13. #43
    FULL MEMBERS nightcrawler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    FSD
    Posts
    1,446
    Thanked
    335 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    The very unique engine of Beriev-200

    Type of engines D-436TP
    - take-off power, kgf 2x7500
    - cruise power, kgf 2x1500
    a very good post by an MIT professor
    http://www.maximizingprogress.org/20...amphibian.html
    Firemaster thanked this.

  14. #44
    FULL MEMBERS Firemaster's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tu Kya le
    Posts
    1,118
    Thanked
    543 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters

    Quote Originally Posted by conworldus View Post
    No sir. It is not easily found. Chemical test uses different acid to decompose the alloy but unless you know before hand what it is, it takes a long time to guess. Secondly, it is one thing to know the chemical structure, but it is entirely different thing to know how to get that structure and its physical conditions. Metallurgy is a science based on theory but also hugely on experience and system control. This is something you cannot copy.

    Now imagine going through the steps for hundreds of thousands of engine parts. Now that's a mountain of work! This is an incredible achievement.

    Think why India is struggling so hard with its Kaveri engine?
    Why bring India into this .We are not copier like you do

  15. #45
    FULL MEMBERS nightcrawler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    FSD
    Posts
    1,446
    Thanked
    335 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Engines used in different fighters



    Quote Originally Posted by conworldus View Post
    Metallurgy is a science based on theory but also hugely on experience and system control. This is something you cannot copy.
    This is true...


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Radar Ranges Of Different Fighters
    By ANTIBODY in forum Air Warfare
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 03-15-2013, 11:18 AM
  2. RCS OF Different Fighters
    By iceman2009 in forum Air Warfare
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 11-19-2012, 10:58 AM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-09-2011, 05:53 AM
  4. Russia to deliver engines for Indian MiG fighters
    By booo in forum Indian Defence
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 03:25 AM
  5. Russia stops China from handing its engines to Pak for fighters
    By Goodperson in forum Pakistan Air Force
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 08-26-2007, 09:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •