Pakistan Defence
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 54
Thanks Tree24Thanks

US wants regional players to take ownership




  1. #31
    FULL MEMBERS ManuZ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    443
    Thanked
    559 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: New Zealand

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership



    Quote Originally Posted by Aryan_B View Post
    They were trained in Indian consulates. We know who the real enemy is. Do what you will. say what you will we will hold you back in the race with China. You can not win in our neighbourhood
    Listen this thread is about India becoming a proxy for white man. Lets discuss that.
    Dewd U should stop watching Zaid Hamids videos..

  2. #32
    FULL MEMBERS sachin@india's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    651
    Thanked
    516 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by Aryan_B View Post
    You do not speak for India, you are just a jingoistic little troll.

    Back to topic America wants to us India as cannon fodder for their interests in Pakistan
    now don't do personal attacks....

    India will do whatever in her own interest..period

  3. #33
    FULL MEMBERS ManuZ's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    443
    Thanked
    559 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: New Zealand

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by Aryan_B View Post
    You do not speak for India, you are just a jingoistic little troll.

    Back to topic America wants to us India as cannon fodder for their interests in Pakistan
    Look who is calling whom a troll...

  4. #34
    FULL MEMBERS hawx's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Posts
    616
    Thanked
    568 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    They were trained in Indian consulates. We know who the real enemy is. Do what you will. say what you will we will hold you back in the race with China. You can not win in our neighbourhood
    Listen this thread is about India becoming a proxy for white man. Lets discuss that.
    The only country leaving behind is paradise of south asia aka asian tiger aka pakistan,you will hold us back ??????we are on right track we may be 10 years behind china but who cares,we will achieve our objectives things are improving day by day unlike some other countries.

  5. #35
    MEMBER lem34's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24
    Thanked
    18010 times

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by hawx View Post
    The only country leaving behind is paradise of south asia aka asian tiger aka pakistan,you will hold us back ??????we are on right track we may be 10 years behind china but who cares,we will achieve our objectives things are improving day by day unlike some other countries.
    What you talking about 10 years behind China. That is a preposterous assertion. Constantly repeating a lie does not make it true. Your timid govt is looking to the white man to protect you from China etc. The west just want to use India as cannon fodder. Wake up mate.

  6. #36
    FULL MEMBERS sachin@india's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    651
    Thanked
    516 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by Aryan_B View Post
    What you talking about 10 years behind China. That is a preposterous assertion. Constantly repeating a lie does not make it true. Your timid govt is looking to the white man to protect you from China etc. The west just want to use India as cannon fodder. Wake up mate.
    actually white men have used pakistan as cannon fodder...go and see yourself in waziristan and NWFP

  7. #37
    MEMBER Dalit's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    roof
    Posts
    31
    Thanked
    9 times
    Users Country Flag: Yugoslavia Users Location Flag: Cameroon

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    They have used Pakistan as cannon fodder. Though, India is now heading in the very same direction. An alliance with the Americans means no free lunch. I think you're smart enough to read in between the lines. Let's not fool ourselves.

  8. #38
    SENIOR MEMBERS OrionHunter's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    India
    Posts
    4,867
    Thanked
    6280 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by Luffy 500 View Post
    The yanks should leave AF to Pakistan, china and Iran to solve. These 3 countries know more about Afghans than the ignorant and arrogant yanks will ever have.
    That's what may not happen at all! There's too much at stake in Afghanistan for countries like Iran, Pakistan, China, CIS Republics, Saudi Arabia, U.S., Russia, India, the so called Northern Alliance (Anti Taliban) and local warlords. A veritable cauldron of conflicting interests!

    I feel the situation is going to get a lot worse after the ISAF departs, what with this lame duck government in Afghanistan at the helm. Even if the Quetta Shaura is handed over the reins of governance in Afghanistan (together with other Taliban factions wanting a piece of the cake), it will most likely lead to civil war and utter chaos! And needless to say, karzai will flee to the US of A along with his corrupt cronies.

    I ain't a crystal-ball gazer, but this is what the scenario would most likely be. And that so called Indo-Afghan security pact that Karzai signed would not be worth the paper it's written on!
    Last edited by OrionHunter; 03-16-2012 at 06:27 PM.
    lem34 thanked this.

  9. #39
    SENIOR MEMBERS salman108's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saudi Arabia
    Posts
    3,309
    Thanked
    2761 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Saudi Arabia

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by OrionHunter View Post
    That's what may not happen at all! There's too much at stake in Afghanistan for countries like Iran, Pakistan, China, CIS Republics, U.S., Russia, India, the so called Northern Alliance (Anti Taliban) and local warlords. A veritable cauldron of conflicting interests!

    I feel the situation is going to get a lot worse after the ISAF departs, what with this lame duck government in Afghanistan at the helm. Even if the Quetta Shaura is handed over the reins of governance in Afghanistan (together with other Taliban factions wanting a piece of the cake), it will most likely lead to civil war and utter chaos! And needless to say, karzai will flee to the US of A along with his corrupt cronies.

    I ain't a crystal-ball gazer, but this is what the scenario would most likely be.
    WRONG !
    did it happen the last time ?
    The time of Taliban was the most peaceful afghans have seen.
    More than a decade later, billions of dollars and all NATO could not beat that.

  10. #40
    FULL MEMBERS manofwar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Disneyland
    Posts
    1,145
    Thanked
    670 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Actually in 1997, during the reign of Taliban afghanistan had the highest child,infant and maternal mortality rates in Asia.An estimated 10 million landmines covered it's terrain. The human rights of the females and the minorities like the buddhists were freely violated(ancient statues of buddha were destroyed).You call this peace?

  11. #41
    MEMBER lem34's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24
    Thanked
    18010 times

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by sachin@india View Post
    actually white men have used pakistan as cannon fodder...go and see yourself in waziristan and NWFP
    Corrupt Pakistani leaders not the Pakistani people

    Quote Originally Posted by Dalit View Post
    They have used Pakistan as cannon fodder. Though, India is now heading in the very same direction. An alliance with the Americans means no free lunch. I think you're smart enough to read in between the lines. Let's not fool ourselves.
    Give it a rest polls have shown that Pakistanis dislike America and its policies. You can not blame all Pakistanis for the corrupt leaders. In your case Indians like you actually want American interference in our neighbourhood

    Quote Originally Posted by OrionHunter View Post
    That's what may not happen at all! There's too much at stake in Afghanistan for countries like Iran, Pakistan, China, CIS Republics, U.S., Russia, India, the so called Northern Alliance (Anti Taliban) and local warlords. A veritable cauldron of conflicting interests!

    I feel the situation is going to get a lot worse after the ISAF departs, what with this lame duck government in Afghanistan at the helm. Even if the Quetta Shaura is handed over the reins of governance in Afghanistan (together with other Taliban factions wanting a piece of the cake), it will most likely lead to civil war and utter chaos! And needless to say, karzai will flee to the US of A along with his corrupt cronies.

    I ain't a crystal-ball gazer, but this is what the scenario would most likely be.
    Orion mate you speak a lot of sense are you really an Indian lol

  12. #42
    Banned Members Harry Potter's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hogwarts
    Posts
    609
    Thanked
    783 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Even Taliban doesn't dare to underestimate India:
    Taliban say they can 'reconcile' with India
    PTI Mar 26, 2010, 06.09pm IST

    NEW DELHI: Claiming that they were not in "direct conflict" with India, Taliban have said there was a possibility of reconciliation even as they justified the February 26 Kabul attack on Indians as a "legitimate" action.

    In a self-contradicting interview, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid claimed his organisation did not want India out of Afghanistan but attacked the country for supporting the Hamid Karzai government and western forces.

    "If the Taliban return to power, we would like to maintain normal relations with countries including India. It's possible for the Taliban and India to reconcile with each other," Mujahid told a news magazine.

    He said "India's role is different from those countries that sent troops to occupy Afghanistan."

    At the same time, he added that, "India isn't neutral in the Afghan conflict as it is supporting the military presence of US-led coalition forces in Afghanistan and working for the strengthening of the Hamid Karzai government."

    Also, he said, "India has never condemned the civilian casualties caused by the occupying forces", a reference to US-led troops in Afghanistan.

    Asked about the February 26 attack in which Indians, housed in two hotels in Kabul, were targeted, the spokesman said Taliban were responsible for it.

    He said it was carried out by "Taliban fighters after we got intelligence information that RAW agents were holding a meeting there."

    The February 26 attack targeted Indians engaged in developmental projects like medical and education programmes, killing seven of them.

    Claiming that India was supporting the Afghan government and the western forces, Mujahid said the country is, "therefore, a legitimate target for us."

    Asked if Taliban wanted India out of Afghanistan, he said, We are not saying that India should be out of Afghanistan. Nor can India be completely expelled from Afghanistan.""

    The Taliban spokesman noted that India and Afghanistan have had historic ties and said "The Taliban aren't in any direct conflict with India. India troops aren't part of NATO forces, they haven't occupied Afghanistan."

    He claimed that Taliban"favour neither India not Pakistan" but hastened to add that they cannot "ignore Pakistan as it is a neighbouring Islamic country" and was on good terms with them when they were in power.

    "India, on the other hand, backed anti-Taliban forces of the Northern Alliance (NA) and refused to do business with our government... Our complaint is India backed the NA (Northern Alliance), and is now supporting the Karzai government," Mujahid said.
    He was also critical when asked about Indian projects and whether those were beneficial for Afghan people.

    Claiming that India was doing all this to promote its interest in Afghanistan, he said, "If India were so fond of the Afghan people, why did it not undertake development projects under Taliban rule?"

  13. #43
    MEMBER lem34's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24
    Thanked
    18010 times

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Potter View Post
    Even Taliban doesn't dare to underestimate India:
    No everyone trembles when they hear India's name. Example everyone so scared of flying coffin air force

  14. #44
    FULL MEMBERS manofwar's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Disneyland
    Posts
    1,145
    Thanked
    670 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership

    ^^^no need to troll mate. You can put your point without being rude...

  15. #45
    MEMBER lem34's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    24
    Thanked
    18010 times

    Default Re: US wants regional players to take ownership



    Quote Originally Posted by manofwar View Post
    ^^^no need to troll mate. You can put your point without being rude...
    Sorry that you think that is trolling. I think a number of Indians those that have a deluded version of Indians position on the world stage is trolling. West and India are trying to make India a proxy in a neighbourhood that just does not agree or want this. for example Sri Lanka: The Irrelevance Of India In Geneva


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BBC : England players 'want Pakistan players banned'
    By Gentle Typhoon in forum Cricket
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-03-2010, 07:35 AM
  2. Photographs Ownership
    By omw in forum Suggestions & Discussions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-17-2009, 09:39 PM
  3. Gun ownership in Pakistan
    By imiakhtar in forum Strategic & Geopolitical Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-06-2007, 10:07 PM
  4. Private Gun Ownership
    By sigatoka in forum Strategic & Geopolitical Issues
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-20-2007, 08:27 AM
  5. Gun Ownership, Is it justified?
    By sigatoka in forum World Affairs
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 08-08-2006, 03:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •