India did not have nukes till 74 and not operational nuke till 98. So why was not kashmir independent before that?
You are misinformed, bangladeshis here cannot find anything good about India.
But then you are new here, I bet your idea will be bangladeshi good, Iranian good, pakistani bad and arab bad?
Kashmiri freedom struggle could not have been suppressed for so long. With nukes India got a
bargaining chip. Without nukes PAK could have still tried to snatch kashmir without fear of
retaliation and APJ kalam contributed to india's strength in this case. He helped a islamophobic
country get stronger, so he is an enemy of islam and muslim in IMO.
There are Muslims who serve the Indian Armed Forces.
If you would like to find out more about Jammu & Kashmir, I'd recommend going to the Kashmir section of this forum. Although, you'd have to wait until you make it to senior.
Talking about Kashmir is prohibited outside that forum. And you'll never see me in that section
*It's too complicated*
Last edited by Loki; 07-03-2012 at 12:38 AM.
Whatever the case, indian nukes helped india to strengthen her grip in kashmir. India could have
got nukes even without Kalam. But since he contributed in an islamophobic country's nuke and
missile programme, I consider him an enemy of muslim. Its just my opinion.
OK indians lets not derail the thread. Keep on talking about the greatness of shinning indian leaders.
Last edited by Luffy 500; 07-03-2012 at 12:43 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)