Ajmal Kasab's Indian trial

[Kharian_Beast]

The circus is in Mumbai, get your tickets here folks!

[sherdil76]

but what worrying me most, now west also likes bollywood movies and just recently awarded so many oscars... somthing is realy cooking there, but surely nasty as pork!

[Rajkumar]

Originally Posted by Kharian_Beast

The circus is in Mumbai, get your tickets here folks!

and 'beast' is from Pakistan

[Neo]

Torture him for a while and he'll confess anything you want.

[AgNoStIc MuSliM]

The thread title has been changed to more accurately reflect what kasab alleged.

Get some comprehension skills folks, and try not to play the same role as the media by sensationalizing threads and inciting flame wars by making out of context headlines.

[Screaming Skull]

Hey mods why did u change the title of the thread? Didn't you read the following in the post?

"a serving member of the Pakistani Army, Colonel Saadat Ullah, who is alleged to have helped to set up the internet telephony system through which the gunmen received instruction from their Pakistan-based handlers."

So is it only training after all? Isn't a Pak army officer a part of the Pak army? Why do you see him in isolation. Or is it that now even Pak army like ISI has some bad blood?

So who lacks comprehension skills now?

[AgNoStIc MuSliM]

On the issue of his confession - why on earth would the PA use someone of the rank of a Colonel to set up 'internet telephony', when any techie of the street could have done so?

[AgNoStIc MuSliM]

Originally Posted by Screaming Skull

Hey mods why did u change the title of the thread? Didn't you read the following in the post?

"a serving member of the Pakistani Army, Colonel Saadat Ullah, who is alleged to have helped to set up the internet telephony system through which the gunmen received instruction from their Pakistan-based handlers."

I changed the title of the thread to reflect Kasab's confession.

Are you suggesting the title is not what Kasab alleged? Please indicate how it is inaccurate.

Now you'll tell me that because an Indian Army officer rapes a woman in kashmir, that's an institutional policy followed by the IA?

[Screaming Skull]

Originally Posted by AgNoStIc MuSliM

I changed the title of the thread to reflect Kasab's confession.

Are you suggesting the title is not what Kasab alleged? Please indicate how it is inaccurate.

I would rather ask you what was wrong with the title that I had kept? It read "Kasab's confession suggests Pak Army involvement in 26/11 Mumbai attacks."

Originally Posted by AgNoStIc MuSliM

Now you'll tell me that because an Indian Army officer rapes a woman in kashmir, that's an institutional policy followed by the IA?

Are you comparing a rape incident with the Mumbai attacks. If you are then pls confirm then we can further continue the discussion.

[Asim Aquil]

Originally Posted by saadahmed

The only surviving suspected gunman in the Mumbai terror attacks has retracted his confession after claiming it was extracted by torture, his defence lawyer says.
Mumbai Terror Attacks: Mohammed Ajmal Kasab Retracts Confession And Alleges Torture | World News | Sky News

hahahaha, owned.

[shukla_swapnil]

I suggest having a Single and preferably sticky thread for KASAB TRIAL to avoid any similar confusion. If we want to have discussions a single thread will be more successful. All the various KASAB TRIAL threads should be mreged nd made sticky - A request to MODS.

[AgNoStIc MuSliM]

Originally Posted by Screaming Skull

I would rather ask you what was wrong with the title that I had kept? It read "Kasab's confession suggests Pak Army involvement in 26/11 Mumbai attacks."

Are you comparing a rape incident with the Mumbai attacks. If you are then pls confirm then we can further continue the discussion.

Your title suggested that the Pakistan Army as an institution was involved, whereas kasab's confession alleges someone claiming to be a Colonel met him (gave him his name and rank and how he was going to be assisting in a terrorist attack). There is a distinct difference between the two.

I am not suggesting that a rape or terrorist attack are the same crime, what I am pointing out if you argue that one crime allegedly committed by a serving Army officer can be used to justify institutional involvement (this alleged colonel setting up internet telephony), then so can another (Army personnel raping women) - its a fallacious argument.

[AgNoStIc MuSliM]

Originally Posted by shukla_swapnil

I suggest having a Single and preferably sticky thread for KASAB TRIAL to avoid any similar confusion. If we want to have discussions a single thread will be more successful. All the various KASAB TRIAL threads should be mreged nd made sticky - A request to MODS.

That's a good idea.

Please post the links of any other kasab threads related to the trial you see so I can merge them.

Thanks

[shukla_swapnil]

I suggest having a Single and preferably sticky thread for KASAB TRIAL to avoid any similar confusion. If we want to have discussions a single thread will be more successful. All the various KASAB TRIAL threads should be mreged nd made sticky - A request to MODS.

[Screaming Skull]

Originally Posted by AgNoStIc MuSliM

Your title suggested that the Pakistan Army as an institution was involved, whereas kasab's confession alleges someone claiming to be a Colonel met him (gave him his name and rank and how he was going to be assisting in a terrorist attack). There is a distinct difference between the two.

I am not suggesting that a rape or terrorist attack are the same crime, what I am pointing out if you argue that one crime allegedly committed by a serving Army officer can be used to justify institutional involvement (this alleged colonel setting up internet telephony), then so can another (Army personnel raping women) - its a fallacious argument.

Ah so now you are getting into the technicalities of things. Let me ask you wont the same argument hold if 10 IA soldiers cross over to ur side and kill people and the IA says that the the 10 soldiers acted upon their own discretion and IA as an institution wasn't involved?