Scores dead in Mumbai train bombs

[Jay_]

---

---

Iaf doesnt have enuf planes to both destroy PAF, neutralise ground based AAA and conduct close ground support..........

Pretty simple, IA will not be in Lahore fighting with pitchforked farmers unless IAF acheives total air supremacy against PAF. If not PA will target IA using PAF.

[Awesome]

Pretty simple, IA will not be in Lahore fighting with pitchforked farmers unless IAF acheives total air supremacy against PAF. If not PA will target IA using PAF.

Give it a while and that final piece of dominance would be eliminated as well.

[Jay_]

Give it a while and that final piece of dominance would be eliminated as well.

I was talking about air superiority in this scenario and you talk about your agenda, what ever makes you sleep tight in the night

[Bull]

there is a saying if you want to shoot then shoot dont talk, so if india want a war they should put the money where there mouth is attack not gobble, as for pakistan we are ready for it bring it on dont just keep bluffing it on...

There is a slight confusion GOI hasnt said it needs war but posters here have. There a hell of a diff u see.

[Bull]

Give it a while and that final piece of dominance would be eliminated as well.

Well yeah the airforce thats the only piece of dominance we have....?Are you sure?

We have a better navy and oh yes we also have a better standing in the intl community bcoz we dont export bombers.

There is no way a country with a much lower economic might can catch up with the big brother you see.

You cant buy as much as we do, you cant loose as much as we do...plain simple..

[sigatoka]

Well yeah the airforce thats the only piece of dominance we have....?Are you sure?

We have a better navy and oh yes we also have a better standing in the intl community bcoz we dont export bombers.

There is no way a country with a much lower economic might can catch up with the big brother you see.

You cant buy as much as we do, you cant loose as much as we do...plain simple..

India can not win against Pak. if it breaks the conventional army, it will be destroyed with Nuclear weapons. The sooner the Indian HQ realises this simple fact, the quicker stability will come to the Sub-continent.

[Jay_]

Heh, that so called simple fact is not a fact at all, Kargil just disproved it. India and Pakistan can still fight border wars.

[Officer of Engineers]

No! The sooner Pakistan realizes that nuclear weapons will not stop an Indian onslaught, the sooner you will have realistic expectations. [Mod Edit: Mind the language] keep ignoring the Cold War Lessons!

[Bull]

India can not win against Pak. if it breaks the conventional army, it will be destroyed with Nuclear weapons. The sooner the Indian HQ realises this simple fact, the quicker stability will come to the Sub-continent.

Well OOE has put it across...but still it wont satisfy me unless i answer it myself. Nukes cant destroy India...whast the biggest nuke you are having..im sure pakistan dont have that big a nuke that can destroy india in one strike!!!

India also would think twice before using nukes on pakistan as the liely target islamabad lies pretty close to the Indian border.

And also how are you planning to nuke India...F-16..with the current state of F-16 in PAF inventory..it runs the risk of being shot down over pakistan itself...missiles..which missiles???...which missile groups do you have..he many regiments?

[JSK]

India can not win against Pak. if it breaks the conventional army, it will be destroyed with Nuclear weapons. The sooner the Indian HQ realises this simple fact, the quicker stability will come to the Sub-continent.

hmm..it has in the past though - do you keep forgetting that Pakistan is not the ONLY country with nuclear weapons...who knows - Pakistan may get destroyed before even getting to use their nukes.

With this kind of attitude - both countries with vanish in a blink of an eye

[Sid]

---

---

Ok Ladies. This thread is being closed until further notice so that a good number of you can grow up and learn to engage in a more mature discussion.