Pakistan Defence
Thanks Tree13968Thanks

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]




  1. #4966
    FULL MEMBERS ziaulislam's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    peshawar
    Posts
    1,200
    Thanked
    310 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]



    price issue is very simple but memebers are getting confused.
    The base line cost is approx 18-19 million for the first deal for PAF ( 42 aircrfts for 800 million).
    Today, adding inflation of approx 6-8% for 4 years and upgrades cost , we expect the price to be somewhere around 25 million.

    now these figures are for PAF, export customer will have to pay at least 4-5 million more.
    Green Blood and mylovepakistan thanked this.

  2. #4967
    FULL MEMBERS abdulbarijan's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Islamabad
    Posts
    299
    Thanked
    484 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: China

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by ANTIBODY View Post
    nabil-
    Work on JFT EW began in Pakistan even before other avionics, WMMC, radar, MFDs etc. The reason for asking French for a customized version of SPECTRA that i disclosed here was because we, and Chinese, are already working on similar technology, advanced algorithms to significantly reduce incoming threats, RCS, heat plumb etc. This EW system is ready to be tested and will be incorporated in second batch onwards. It is not as complicated as SPECTRA but significantly reduces the threat to JFT. Even current block has a better version of complete EW, very similar to what the Chinese J-10a uses, SE-2 (JFT Missile Approach & Warning System) is absent in J-10a but visible in J-10b, J-11b etc. I can tell u that JFT has least RCS among all PAF fighter fleet inventory, cant go any further on this .
    If you look closely at DSI shape, you will notice that they are designed as a blunt, engine covering surfaces, yet they provide ample airflow to the engine at very high Angle of Attack. They play as much role in JFT's agility as does its LERX and Digital FBW. Particularly to reduce/absorb radar rays in an efficient manner (its no way near stealth). Its surface is as rounded as it could be done. This plays a pivotal role in reducing the frontal RCS. Also, the engine is not visible through DSI and one has to see closely to locate engine blades. Its heartening to see how it has evolved..

    Its airframe is designed to pull 9Gs. Zhuhai performance confirms this although it was less than what it can do in real combat scenario. Instantaneous as well as Sustained turn rate is higher than the f-16 for sure judging from airshow videos even though it was at around 400-600 kts at best. It is showing more promise than, at least i thought, for a main stay fighter. Other day, i saw praise for it on an Indian forum which is a rare event indeed.


    It has pushed to 9Gs more than 2 dozen times during PAF trials since 2008-2010 and its airshow performance is an ample proof of this. Regarding rd-93, neither it is under powered nor the most powerful around and it gives JFT the ability to make vertical climbs even at nominal speeds. Those quick turns and climbs are more than a proof of its strong airframe capable of sustained 9G performance. I recommend you to see the JFT Zhuhai videos closely and repeatedly, concentrating on every turn and maneuver and especially those long smoke, moisture trials seem attached to the wings almost every time it maneuvers, to understand what i am talking about. Not everything can be proved on a public forum, having a little improvisation with rational thought never hurts.

    Smoke is only visible when throttle is pushed which results in access fuel in the engine chamber which results in smoke and this is the case with all turbofans out there including the Pratt & Whitney, GE, Snecma, RDs, Salyuts etc to name a few , notice the smoke only comes out when the aircraft is in need of thrust otherwise there is no smoke trail. Educate yourself on how the aircraft engine works than argue.


    For those who think JFT has mechanical controls in roll or yaw, watch the Zhuhai videos to see its FBW performance especially low speed roll after recovering from vertical climb. It revolves on its own axis and maintains position, instead, if you look at Mirage or f-7, they lose their actual position while rolling. F-16 also rolls similar to JFT.

    35 PAF engineers part of JFT development team from the beginning of project. They didnt go there to watch and learn, but to contribute their share of expertise, the idea of DSI, extended lerx, ecm housing, full glass cockpit, high performance mission computers (we have been using them on ROSE mirage and F-16s for many years and we got tremendous boost to our avionics development capability by contributing with French, Italians for last 15 years) quad fly-by-wire, all in pt 04, is the brainchild of our engineers..




    For JF-17 Kamra.

    • S9100 Test Station.
    • S8862 in Circuit Test Station.
    • LASAAR Software. M/s Teradyne, USA
    2 Development tools for JF-17 Kamra. M/s Windriver, USA.
    3 Power Generators 150KVA M/s FG Wilson, UK
    4 Load Cells M/s Futek, USA.
    5 Standby Batteries M/s Hawker, Enersys France.




    After reading the above discussions i find difficult to hide the JFT RCS i came to know, but let me just say for now, it is the most difficult aircraft to spot on the radar in PAF inventory at the moment and this includes the blk 52 too! No exaggeration here, plain facts..

    PAF tested both ALQ131 and KG300G on JFT. the latter was found more efficient and supports more jamming modes, algorithms having true multiple mode jamming capability. It comprises of a mixture of Chinese, Israeli and Russian jamming technologies and is based on all digital circuitry. First entered service in 1997 and since than improved twice over its service life in Chinese Arm Forces, next variant is considered in the class of more advanced jammers/ ecm pods available in the world today.

    Without going into details, JFT's KG300G, internal jammer has proved itself as a very efficient multi band jamming sensor and will make JFT a hard nut to crack in intense combat scenarios..
    ..............................

  3. #4968
    FULL MEMBERS alimobin memon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan, Pakistan
    Posts
    844
    Thanked
    296 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by BelligerentPacifist View Post
    Why would anybody want to compare it to the F-15? They're both very different aircraft.
    Comparison is necessary cause if in War all fighters will be used so we might face F15 of US

  4. #4969
    FULL MEMBERS shanixee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    UAE
    Posts
    246
    Thanked
    160 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    what happend to the 3rd squadren which was to take place in Feb.....delayed again..??

    any news abt it..??

  5. #4970
    MEMBER lookstraight's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    islamabad
    Posts
    0
    Thanked
    0 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by shanixee View Post
    what happend to the 3rd squadren which was to take place in Feb.....delayed again..??

    any news abt it..??
    Speaking of squadrons I was just looking at my old google earth place marks(and we all know Google Earth is no benchmark of activity but still) it seems odd that JF-17's are not as visible at their bases as just a while ago. I mean only one visible jf-17 at kamra and none where they are actually stationed.I remember seeing more than a few at kamra and peshawar just out side their bunkers and even on the tarmac only a short while ago. May be my eyes are playing tricks on me or PAF has improved Camo techniques.

    But if I have made correct observation then Is it due to some revised SOP or austerity measures or just plain luck?

  6. #4971
    THINK TANK fatman17's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Karachi
    Posts
    15,670
    Thanked
    14314 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by shanixee View Post
    what happend to the 3rd squadren which was to take place in Feb.....delayed again..??

    any news abt it..??
    we'll know soon enough!

  7. #4972
    SENIOR MEMBERS farhan_9909's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bannu
    Posts
    3,547
    Thanked
    2377 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United Arab Emirates

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Single engine

  8. #4973
    SENIOR MEMBERS persona_non_grata's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Changah Mangah
    Posts
    3,855
    Thanked
    2999 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]



    Sorry if this has been asked before but how come the JF-17 has a greater combat radius than the F-16
    What am I missing ?
    Photo courtesy: farhan_9909
    jamesbaldwin thanked this.

  9. #4974
    FULL MEMBERS Pak47's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Stratosphere
    Posts
    1,166
    Thanked
    1260 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf_shurtah View Post


    Sorry if this has been asked before but how come the JF-17 has a greater combat radius than the F-16
    What am I missing ?
    Photo courtesy: farhan_9909
    max speed listed at 2.0? Nice.
    persona_non_grata thanked this.

  10. #4975
    FULL MEMBERS alimobin memon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan, Pakistan
    Posts
    844
    Thanked
    296 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by Pak47 View Post
    max speed listed at 2.0? Nice.
    This is not correct !!

  11. #4976
    SENIOR MEMBERS DANGER-ZONE's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    DANGER-ZONE
    Posts
    2,756
    Thanked
    2841 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf_shurtah View Post


    Sorry if this has been asked before but how come the JF-17 has a greater combat radius than the F-16
    What am I missing ?
    Photo courtesy: farhan_9909
    This data is very much INAPPROPRIATE. I see too many errors like, JF-17 Speed and a 4+ gen fighter, LCA Super Cruse & Mach 2.2, F-16 range .. etc

  12. #4977
    FULL MEMBERS soul hacker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    islamabad
    Posts
    490
    Thanked
    794 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Concept image of the upcoming 2 seat variant of the fc-1, block II.


  13. #4978
    THINK TANK Dazzler's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    uroos ul bilaad
    Posts
    2,368
    Thanked
    4829 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    more like the JFT B model.

  14. #4979
    SENIOR MEMBERS hasnain0099's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Karachi/Faisalabad
    Posts
    5,444
    Thanked
    2902 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by pdf_shurtah View Post


    Sorry if this has been asked before but how come the JF-17 has a greater combat radius than the F-16
    What am I missing ?
    Photo courtesy: farhan_9909
    One Word, never trust Wikipedia, Tom can edit it, Dick can do so and so does the Harry!

  15. #4980
    PDF VETERAN Imran Khan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    islamabad
    Posts
    19,705
    Thanked
    25499 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]



    Quote Originally Posted by soul hacker View Post
    Concept image of the upcoming 2 seat variant of the fc-1, block II.

    fans of jft make it every thing already done only CAC-PAC can"t


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 552
    Last Post: 11-22-2012, 08:10 PM
  2. UAE wants SU 35 Multirole fighter jet
    By Super Falcon in forum Pakistan Air Force
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 12:23 AM
  3. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 3852
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 12:47 PM
  4. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 2]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 1450
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 12:21 PM
  5. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 1]
    By Neo in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 1230
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 11:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •