Pakistan Defence
Thanks Tree13968Thanks

JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]




  1. #5296
    THINK TANK Najam Khan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    City of the Dead
    Posts
    1,480
    Thanked
    2338 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool



    Quote Originally Posted by mafiya View Post
    0.95 T/W ratio of JF-17 is based on max thrust and we know aircraft does not operate on max thrust and rd-93 can not sustain afterburner for long.. So operating T/W of JF-17 in normal conditions would be 0.80-0.85
    How do you know thats true? IMO its just a forum myth, in reality a 20-30second afterburner is enough to dry out two 360 gallon fuel tanks. This assumption might have evolved from some related stories of Mig-29, but the case of Thunder isnt actually the same.

    In simple words, PAF would never gamble on such vital element in JF-17. If such problems related to RD-93 exist, we might never have seen 40 thunders leaving the production lines.
    TOPGUN, TaimiKhan, Oscar and 2 others thanked this.

  2. #5297
    JR. THINK TANK sancho's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    7,526
    Thanked
    5563 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: Germany

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Quote Originally Posted by ANTIBODY View Post
    yes pakistan's website has old data , i think of prototype1
    It was updated and made some changes, but the thrust remains the same and is still around 84kN only, the 98kN in that graphic by the key forum member is just a fake spec. As explained earlier, RD 93 is based on RD 33-3 series and is older than the latest MK verison, so only future upgrades of RD 93 based on the MK can get it to the advertised thrust range of Klimov.


    Quote Originally Posted by Najam Khan View Post
    How do you know thats true? IMO its just a forum myth, in reality a 20-30second afterburner is enough to dry out two 360 gallon fuel tanks. This assumption might have evolved from some related stories of Mig-29, but the case of Thunder isnt actually the same.

    In simple words, PAF would never gamble on such vital element in JF-17. If such problems related to RD-93 exist, we might never have seen 40 thunders leaving the production lines.
    I guess he meant that this is the TWR with AB thrust, but normally fighters opperates with dry thrust, unless they have Supercruise capabilities, so this TWR is limited to a certain time.
    Last edited by sancho; 03-27-2012 at 02:56 PM.
    Ammyy and sandy_3126 thanked this.

  3. #5298
    FULL MEMBERS killerx's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    pakistan
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanked
    607 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by Pak47 View Post
    Sir, according to your link provided it still shows T/W 0.95 and max speed 1.6.
    guys making the website are stupid

  4. #5299
    SENIOR MEMBERS graphican's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    PAKISTAN
    Posts
    4,179
    Thanked
    3752 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by killerx View Post
    guys making the website are stupid
    But the client for whom this site is made is not stupid. May be its a policy not to reveal the actual potency of the jet but publically what we have is what we have.
    mughaljee, Last Hope and hotaki thanked this.

  5. #5300
    SENIOR MEMBERS mafiya's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Lahore/Doha
    Posts
    3,853
    Thanked
    4481 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Qatar

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by graphican View Post
    But the client for whom this site is made is not stupid. May be its a policy not to reveal the actual potency of the jet but publically what we have is what we have.
    if client is not stupid then whats the purpose of hiding such details from common masses. In few years, jet will be sold to international customers, then these stats will be disclosed to them and it will eventually become available to us then. Client has the weird habit of such things where he only discloses these things to international air magazines or third parties then things travel down to us. Weird and illogical habit.

  6. #5301
    FULL MEMBERS The enlightened's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Your mind
    Posts
    652
    Thanked
    265 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by graphican View Post
    But the client for whom this site is made is not stupid. May be its a policy not to reveal the actual potency of the jet but publically what we have is what we have.
    Ironic that YOU say it, when others in your lot completely refuse to accept that even we or just about everyone else does the same.
    Quote Originally Posted by mafiya View Post
    if client is not stupid then whats the purpose of hiding such details from common masses. In few years, jet will be sold to international customers, then these stats will be disclosed to them and it will eventually become available to us then. Client has the weird habit of such things where he only discloses these things to international air magazines or third parties then things travel down to us. Weird and illogical habit.
    They will be downgraded before selling it to anyone else.

  7. #5302
    SENIOR MEMBERS graphican's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    PAKISTAN
    Posts
    4,179
    Thanked
    3752 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by mafiya View Post
    if client is not stupid then whats the purpose of hiding such details from common masses. In few years, jet will be sold to international customers, then these stats will be disclosed to them and it will eventually become available to us then. Client has the weird habit of such things where he only discloses these things to international air magazines or third parties then things travel down to us. Weird and illogical habit.
    Pakistan follows a principle of war that areas where it is strong, it would pretend to be weak and area where it is weak, it would pretend to be strong. I have followed Nabil, Sir PShamim and others who have been accurate and who tell me that it is one potent platform and its public specs are understated. I give value to their statement and being patriotic I want those inside news to be true but when we are trying to compare specs, we cannot compare stated specs VS suspected ones. I don't have intentions to hurt any fan or positive thinker but I have taught myself to believe what I can prove to myself before proving to others.

    As far as your question goes, I would actually not complain PAF for not disclosing anything valuable to the world outside because its more important to win wars and defend yourself when it is the time instead of winning at forums.
    Last edited by graphican; 03-27-2012 at 07:34 PM.
    PakShaheen79 thanked this.

  8. #5303
    ANG
    ANG is offline
    FULL MEMBERS ANG's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    730
    Thanked
    532 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    Hi, the Klimov website is as follows:

    http://en.klimov.ru/production/aircraft/

    According to the website the RD-93 is a derivative of the RD-33 and is installed on the JF-17/FC-1. The main change is the repositioning of the gear box, as was done in the SMR-95 engine program. The SMR-95 was installed by South Africa on one of its Cheetah and on its Super-Mirage F1 experimental aircraft. I also remember reading in the late 90s that the PAF was very interested in these engine upgrades for its Mirage fleet, but nothing ever happened.

    Klimov :: Production :: Aircraft Program :: RD-33 family


    There is no mention of the RD-33MK being used on the JF-17.

    Klimov :: Production :: Aircraft Program :: RD-33MK

    Also there is a thrust vectoring option for this option, and I am surprised the PAF has not shown any interest.

    Klimov :: Production :: Aircraft Program :: Trust Vertoring Nozzle
    sancho thanked this.

  9. #5304
    FULL MEMBERS Pak47's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Stratosphere
    Posts
    1,166
    Thanked
    1258 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by The enlightened View Post
    They will be downgraded before selling it to anyone else.
    The website provided is just never updated its data is from pt-01
    This is what the customer See's.

    Mankind thanked this.

  10. #5305
    THINK TANK Najam Khan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    City of the Dead
    Posts
    1,480
    Thanked
    2338 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by mafiya View Post
    if client is not stupid then whats the purpose of hiding such details from common masses. In few years, jet will be sold to international customers, then these stats will be disclosed to them and it will eventually become available to us then. Client has the weird habit of such things where he only discloses these things to international air magazines or third parties then things travel down to us. Weird and illogical habit.
    PAC is an expert when it comes to selling things. They speak where its worth it. The information you are talking about is only given to the intended audience during meetings with their representatives. Before the Dubai air show, they made a 1 hr special documentary highlighting their work. Free DVDs were given to such delegations.

    Plus,do you know that PAC has 2x SupMushshak, both having different EFIS technology in glass cockpit? Which means both aircraft are intended for different types of customers. It will be no surprise to hear something similar in Thunder as well.
    TOPGUN, PWFI, Pak123 and 1 others thanked this.

  11. #5306
    FULL MEMBERS REHAN NIAZI FALCON's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Mana Watan Pakistan
    Posts
    1,825
    Thanked
    1116 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by Pak47 View Post
    The website provided is just never updated its data is from pt-01
    This is what the customer See's.

    well here speed too is mentioned as 1.8 mach.

  12. #5307
    FULL MEMBERS Pak47's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Stratosphere
    Posts
    1,166
    Thanked
    1258 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by REHAN NIAZI FALCON View Post
    well here speed too is mentioned as 1.8 mach.
    Yeah, thats what im trying to get you to see, the website isn't all correct.
    killerx and Mankind thanked this.

  13. #5308
    FULL MEMBERS REHAN NIAZI FALCON's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Mana Watan Pakistan
    Posts
    1,825
    Thanked
    1116 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder - Information Pool

    Quote Originally Posted by Pak47 View Post
    Yeah, thats what im trying to get you to see, the website isn't all correct.
    yep jf-17 has improved alot but its quite unfortunate that officials haven,t yet updated the sites and data present in them....

  14. #5309
    FULL MEMBERS killerx's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    pakistan
    Posts
    1,360
    Thanked
    607 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

    website is under the supervision of persons who know nothing of JF17 specs and look at the website yar old style

  15. #5310
    Banned Members hotaki's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    kp
    Posts
    121
    Thanked
    63 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]



    What happened to raising of the third squadron i been waiting impatiently, also what squadron will the third squadron replace?.

    Sir Nabil or any senior members got any news that they can share i will be very grateful.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 552
    Last Post: 11-22-2012, 08:10 PM
  2. UAE wants SU 35 Multirole fighter jet
    By Super Falcon in forum Pakistan Air Force
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 12:23 AM
  3. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 3852
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 12:47 PM
  4. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 2]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 1450
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 12:21 PM
  5. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 1]
    By Neo in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 1230
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 11:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •