
|
|
|||||||
| Military Aviation Discuss about the Pakistani Air Force capability, induction of fighters, changes in air force, comparison with other air forces of the world. |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
SENIOR MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3,161
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 2,346
Thanked 764 Times in 519 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
F7-PG in PAF in the future! wat do u guys think should we get more ? since we are only now limited as in wat we are getting and gona get as per the ACM said please share your views thx!!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
FULL MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Posts: 117
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 16 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
I think Pakistan will keep the 50 or so f-7PG's in their fleet till about 2020 because they have a young airframe, good grifo radar and are modified to carry sidewinder missiles. They will continue to perform the interceptor role. Pakistan WILL NOT order anymore because its looking to the future and is not looking to linger around in the past.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to General Fujita For This Useful Post: | fatman17 (08-25-2008) |
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
FULL MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lahore
Posts: 97
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 10
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
Quote:
Wats the reason for buying a Non-BVR platform when you are localling producing a BVR capable Fighter (JF-17)? | |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Nomi929 For This Useful Post: | fatman17 (08-25-2008) |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
FRESH
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 1
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
i don't think so
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
SENIOR MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,882
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 66
Thanked 1,068 Times in 449 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
![]() ![]() ![]() Old is gold .lolzz
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
SENIOR MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 3,161
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 2,346
Thanked 764 Times in 519 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
Thx for the pic's Haider!! looks like we will be getting afew more per ACM!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
FULL MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lahore
Posts: 97
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 10
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
SENIOR MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Karachi
Posts: 4,849
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 113
Thanked 130 Times in 100 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
|
|
The Phenomina "PEACE" Is The Time Period Of The Preparation For The BIG WAR!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Banned Members
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 345
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 3,433
Thanked 3,621 Times in 2,353 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
PAF does not require more F-7PG's. The current batch was ordered hastly due lack of funds and availability of more capable western design as we once again came under US led weapon embargo after the series of nuclear tests in 1998 and growing tensions with India in 2001.
We don't need more F-7PG when we have more capable JF-17 which according to ACM can be produced in numbers, i.e. 20-25 per year.
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Neo For This Useful Post: | TOPGUN (09-04-2008) |
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Banned Members
![]() |
Not Ranked
:
0 score
The already ordered pg's will stay cause they are fine for getting cheap flight hours. Besides that you just now wanna do a dogfight with a PG! It is small and terrible agile so it reminds me of Gnat against Sabres... Not that the Gnat was super advanced but the fact that (as Murad can tell like no other) you will know that it is around when you hear its guns... I agree its sensors/radar is not the best (and it still has its bicycle wheel brake) but if kindly guided by Erieye you just do not wanna meet the PG... On the other hand during wartime you will be happy with a plane that can maintained in minutes rather a plane that needs a full team of highly trained engineers and expensive and complex tools...
|
|
|
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Munir For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
SENIOR MEMBERS
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Karachi
Posts: 4,849
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 113
Thanked 130 Times in 100 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
Quote:
| |
|
The Phenomina "PEACE" Is The Time Period Of The Preparation For The BIG WAR!
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Banned Members
![]() |
Not Ranked
:
0 score
Quote:
To be precise, J10 would be the better option if we want a real BVR plane. More then 2 BVR are needed. If you are up 2 v 2 you need a lot more then 2 if you want to avoid getting close. So the first two will be around max range to get other into defensive and then two to clean them. Or WVR to get them done and the second pair BVR for the group behind it.. Those are often the real attack planes... Or the second CAP... So 4 BVR and 2 WVR + 2 tanks and decent ECM pod... Otherwise you have a light BVR plane that needs to get secure after the first shot... Ithink they have to think about a Gripen NG kind of main gear for J10 to add 2 BVR extra... | |
|
Last edited by Munir; 09-04-2008 at 10:20 PM. |
||
|
|
|
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Munir For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
FULL MEMBERS
![]() |
Not Ranked
:
0 score
PG have Grifo 7 with added Track While Scan Mode (f7p does not have it) and should be able to guide 2 active bvr, most bvr actual firing range is 75% of published ranges to actually be a threat to opponent. Search range 55 km track range 37 km in best cases and 22km in look down for Grifo 7 is decent medium range for bvr guidance. AIM 120A has 17 nm max range which is almost 20 miles . B /C and other have better.
Major issue max endurance on internal fuel (about 2000kg) about 35-40 minutes with full 3 tank load (1200 kg) 50-55 minutes for Mig 21/F7 so its pure point defense fighter. 2 bvr will help if PAF want to keep it till 2020-2025. Lets see Cheers |
|
Last edited by khanasifm; 09-05-2008 at 06:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Banned Members
![]() |
Not Ranked
:
0 score
Searching 55 km while flying say 750 km/h atleast... Then you have to get into position and fire at around 37 km? Think about the second plane, communicate with your buddy and hope it is not friendly? You can do that within a minute or two? And what if they fire first? You wil bleed a lot of energy or have to face the second round or next CAP... Harldy worth do do. I would no take that chance and fly another day...
You need to see the opponent a lot earlier then its max BVR range... And if possible earlier then he sees you! With a small radar you risk he plane, your carrier and the nation. Keep it as a trainer but do not expect wonders. The Americans have A4 skyhawk a long time in service after it was no longer a frointline airplane... Just to keep topgun pilots eager to win. Not to risk more then that. p.s. it is 2/3 max range... not 3/4.... |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Munir For This Useful Post: | Imran Khan (09-06-2008) |
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Banned Members
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: x
Posts: 1,680
(View Stats)
Countries:
Thanks: 414
Thanked 687 Times in 441 Posts
|
Not Ranked
:
0 score
While it's nice to see the F7's still flying I hope all 50 remaining can be replaced by J11's for the Navy or something, let's do something nice for the Navy for a change huh?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Future Babies of PAF (F-16D 52+) | HAIDER | Military Photos & Multimedia | 26 | 08-05-2008 05:55 AM |
| THE NATION'S FUTURE | flyahyassg | Military History | 37 | 04-08-2008 02:33 AM |
| Future of Pakistan | yarmook | National Political Issues | 30 | 02-20-2008 02:16 AM |
| The Car of the Future is here: | Flintlock | General Images & Multimedia | 2 | 02-18-2008 07:16 PM |
| Islamabad - The Future! | AgNoStIc MuSliM | Economy & Development | 3 | 09-14-2007 07:49 AM |