
Originally Posted by
TaimiKhan
Read carefully, i did not said he was involved,
Your clarification is fair enough.
i said if he by sitting in Afghanistan is having intelligence reports, it means the perpetrators had connections inside Afghanistan too
Base less - might be an operation completely planned and funded inside Pak like the assassination attempt on Musharraf.
If his intelligence guys are even in Pakistan, they are involved with the taliban or AQ groups, thus he should have told also that from which group the intel was coming, who were planning the thing, was it AQ, Taliban or some other group. Main persons involved.
The plethora of suicide cells /assasins for money/terror groups and their splinter cells are hard to be kept track off even by the americans.
So it makes sense that the agencies of afghanistan with their limited resources had access to a few within the "security establishment" who probably relayed that a "supari" has been put out by the higher ups with the name of BB on it . Its not the terror groups that are important here its who used them as the catpaw to dispatch BB.
Yes he did, but do remember, Karzai's name came up in the end, initially he was not interviewed, nor did he came up with the facts.
How does it matter when or where karzai's name came in the report ? and what are the "facts" ?
This is not cowardliness, this is something else.
PPP is not his party, he was in the party due to his wife, even though she kept him miles away from the party affairs, that is why when he came into power, he threw out all the old BB and PPP loyalists and promoted people whom we even did not knew and got them into the govt.
well you give me something else to believe, as i don't see anything else other then that. And its not me, whole Pakistan knows this. Do let us know, how a person with no say in PPPs affairs, who was kept far away from politics of Pakistan, overnight became its most powerful person.
Facts are important not beliefs.This is what Heraldo munez said regarding the conspiracy theories on zardari.Hope this answer is sufficient irrespective of what you and i think or the pakistani on the street was made to think.
Contrastingly in case of the security establishment he said this.
Bravery doesn't means you stand right in the middle of a highway full of high speeding cars and then think you will be safe, that is called stupidity. She had done her jalsaa, she had waved to thousands of people in the gathering, there was no further need to do to a few dozen who had already seen her, especially knowing she is unprotected in the open.
If BB didnt take out any rallies after she returned to pak she PPP wouldnt have a chance of winning the upcoming election.
Unless she knew that the bomber/assasin was going to hit her in
that rally ,which she didnt she is well justified in taking her rally out.
In a country like pakistan where few leaders had the mass base rivaling that of BB among the poor as opposed to the middleclass and the elite mass base of PML-N direct contact is the only way of reaching her supporters what ever might be the risks.
Well then they shouldn't complain about who killed her and who did not, if they can't even do one small investigation. And these oligarchs of ours are themselves a security threat for us, as they care more for money compared to country. If she wasn't let in to the strategic aspects, that was due to some reason.
Why shouldnt they complain ? who controlled the security establishment of pak in 1990 as well as in 2007 ? was it ever under the control of PPP ?
Punjab has a coalition govt, with PPP having good number of seats. And he went to UN after pressure was put onto him, he was not in favor of going to UN, and he is such hopeless that he can't even register an FIR ?? That is ridiculous. Read the report, if security establishment was so much in power, then the ISI chief would not have went to her on 27th Dec and told her once again that there was threat and she should keep her profile low. Read the report, you will see, how many times this same security establishment warned her to have a low profile and other stuff. Even the Saudi Govt, UAE govt and Afghan Karzai warned her, i believe that is sufficient to say, that the local security was not involved, otherwise these 3 govts would not have been warning her.
I read the report and all the time the "security establishment" warned her not to take out rallies with her supporters but never did it provide enough security to her in the first place. Why ? because as i said earlier PPP is a party with mass base and musharaaf knew that PML-Q etc will have a better chance vis-a-vis PPP if BB is confined in her house (i.e cut off from reaching her base) using security threats etc and this should have been obvious to BB too. so she went ahead anyway.
The IB, FIA and other civilian stuff is under the govt. And as for your

, can;t help you, but read the report of the UN.
Do you seriously believe that intelligence agencies are under zardari ?? well let me quote our chilean diplomat again.
That is for you to believe in, as for ground realities the reality is different.
You meant to say the ground
beliefs ?