Pakistan Defence
Page 15 of 111 FirstFirst ... 567891011121314151617181920212223242565 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 1656
Thanks Tree659Thanks

Air Force Question Thread




  1. #211
    Banned Members p2prada's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    481
    Thanked
    23 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread



    OK. Its ur opinion. he has his and i have mine. Lets leave it at that.


    Lets discuss something more constructive cause i m still not sure about PAF BVR capability. What does PAF have.....
    the AMRAAMs are yet to be delivered and the SD-10 is still undergoing tests.

    i have only heard of H2 and H4. Nothing except the names.


    Anyways what is ACAS? I m not aware of PAF administrative positions (and neither that of india)

  2. #212
    SENIOR MODERATOR blain2's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Thanked
    6309 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    ACAS is Assistant Chief of Air Staff equal to the rank of a Maj Gen in the Army. They server under the Deputy Chiefs of Air Staff (of which there are 6 within the PAF). So quite a few ACAS in the PAF.
    Last edited by blain2; 06-27-2008 at 12:10 AM.

  3. #213
    THINK TANK Muradk's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,534
    Thanked
    3505 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by blain2 View Post
    ACAS is Assistant Chief of Air Staff equal to the rank of a Maj Gen in the Army. They server under the Deputy Chiefs of Air Staff (of which there are 6 within the PAF). So quite a few ACAS in the PAF.
    I know the kids father's name he is the Project dir JF-17 . when I talk to him tomorrow lets see where his carrier takes him, I was a son of a general to in 71 war he was fighting on the ground and I in the air, and I asked him a question about one of his missions he slapped me infront of gen Musa who was standing right next to him. The same gen musa who put a medal on my chest 3 days before.
    Musa said Lodhi why did you slap him, and my father replied he should know his place and being an officer he should know better to ask me this question regardless he is my son or not.
    This kid doesn't understand his loose talk will get his father fired.
    Farhat*&^*^&(()&*()

  4. #214
    SENIOR MODERATOR blain2's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Thanked
    6309 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Muradk View Post
    I know the kids father's name he is the Project dir JF-17 . when I talk to him tomorrow lets see where his carrier takes him, I was a son of a general to in 71 war he was fighting on the ground and I in the air, and I asked him a question about one of his missions he slapped me infront of gen Musa who was standing right next to him. The same gen musa who put a medal on my chest 3 days before.
    Musa said Lodhi why did you slap him, and my father replied he should know his place and being an officer he should know better to ask me this question regardless he is my son or not.
    This kid doesn't understand his loose talk will get his father fired.
    Farhat*&^*^&(()&*()
    Murad Sahib,

    This kid is not related to the CPD JF-17 in any way. He made this one claim "third....i live next door to Chief Project Director JF-17....so dun bullshit me on that...Chief Consultant for the JF is a very close frnd

    I can guarantee that he is a military brat running off his mouth not knowing his mouth from his ***. Also this idiot made these remarks in 2005, at the time Shahid Latif sahib used to be CPD JF-17 so I doubt it if the current CPD JF-17 or his kids have anything to do with this. So I would just discount these idiotic comments for what they are..idiotic!

  5. #215
    Banned Members p2prada's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    481
    Thanked
    23 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    I would call that discipline, yes sir.

    Oh! and ASAD ALI mentioned his father is an ACAS. He is the JF proj directors neighbour.

  6. #216
    Banned Members p2prada's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    481
    Thanked
    23 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by blain2 View Post
    ACAS is Assistant Chief of Air Staff equal to the rank of a Maj Gen in the Army. They server under the Deputy Chiefs of Air Staff (of which there are 6 within the PAF). So quite a few ACAS in the PAF.
    Thanks for the info.

  7. #217
    THINK TANK shehbazi2001's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    576
    Thanked
    492 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by p2prada View Post
    OK. Its ur opinion. he has his and i have mine. Lets leave it at that.


    Lets discuss something more constructive cause i m still not sure about PAF BVR capability. What does PAF have.....
    the AMRAAMs are yet to be delivered and the SD-10 is still undergoing tests.

    i have only heard of H2 and H4. Nothing except the names.


    Anyways what is ACAS? I m not aware of PAF administrative positions (and neither that of india)

    From the paintings of Hussaini, its clear that PAF used Matra 530 series medium range missiles with Mirages. Now if you search this missile, Pakistan appears in the list of users.


    But its not clear which version exactly it was. The upgraded Mirages of ROSE-I should in principle carry some french BVR like Matra Super 530D at least. It will be amazing if Mirages were upgraded without the integration of any new weapons.
    Last edited by shehbazi2001; 06-27-2008 at 03:57 PM.

  8. #218
    Banned Members p2prada's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    481
    Thanked
    23 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    I know the IR version was inducted. Its the other 2 i want to know about. Even googling gives forums and wikipedia.

    Some mention PAF had only R-530 and R-550 and not the BVR versions.

    Maybe a pilot in PAF can clear this.

  9. #219
    SENIOR MEMBERS melb4aust's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,551
    Thanked
    48 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Australia

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by p2prada View Post

    Lets discuss something more constructive cause i m still not sure about PAF BVR capability. What does PAF have.....
    the AMRAAMs are yet to be delivered and the SD-10 is still undergoing tests.

    i have only heard of H2 and H4. Nothing except the names.
    H2 and H4 are both classified fitted on to mirage aircrafts, more to say they probably were inducted just to fill the gap until PAF induct JF-17 along with SD-10 or MICA and F-16's with AMRAAM.
    Here is an old news from one of your own media group:
    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Air Force has inducted H-4 Beyond Visual Range missile which could strike a target from a distance of 120 km without visually citing it, evading enemy radars.

    "It is a step towards adding the Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles to our arsenal for defensive purposes and to address the strategic imbalance in the region," Pakistan daily Dawn quoted PAF officials as saying.

    The officials claimed that the missile was developed by the National Engineering and Scientific Commission (NESCOM), which works in close collaboration with Pakistan Missile Organisation and the Air Weapons Complex.

    "Three successful tests of H-4, with the latest conducted this year, produced satisfactory results leading to addition of arsenal in the fighter jets," they said, adding the missiles were modified version of the South African T-Darter BVR missiles. The PAF claims to have H-2 BVR missiles which could hit targets up to 60 km.

    Reports of Pakistan seeking the BVR technology appeared in the South African media. In the face of protests from India, the South African government blamed "rogue" elements to collaborate with Pakistan to develop BVRs.

    PAF officials said the H-4 missiles which was an infra-red device and comparable to that of the AA11, AA12 and Python 4 missiles of the IAF would be fitted on to the PAF's Mirage aircraft until the induction of new plane JF-17 Thunder, jointly developed by Pakistan and China, in 2006.

    They said European and the US suppliers were currently not willing to share the technology with Pakistan but PAF was managing with whatever technology at its disposal.
    Pak Air Force inducts BVR missiles-Pakistan-World-The Times of India

    Wikepedia link: H-2 BVR-AAM - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Not only this PAF F-7's also have some limited BVR capability as pointed out by some of the airforce members on this forum.

    Regarding information about SD-10
    Following the unsuccessful PL-4, PL-10 and PL-11 semi-active radar-homing MRAAM programmes, 607 Institute was asked by the PLA in the mid-1990s to develop a new advanced all-weather, day/night active radar-homing MRAAM comparable to the U.S. AIM-120 AMRAAM and Russian R-77 (NATO codename: AA-12 Adder). The PL-12 development officially began in 1997 and took seven years to complete. During a fire test carried out on 16 August 2005, a total of eleven missiles were fired, all hitting their targets. The first multi-target fire test was also carried out successfully in late 2005.
    Link: PL-12 (SD-10) Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile - SinoDefence.com

    The missile is ready, can be inducted any time sooner. Remind you as of now pakistan already have around 12 JF-17's BVR capable aircrafts that are undergoing several tests. Plus, Thales RC-400 along with MICA has already been offered by france.

    Past was past, we are looking into the future, which seems pretty bright, but sorry to say hard to digest by not some but quite a number of indians.

  10. #220
    THINK TANK shehbazi2001's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    576
    Thanked
    492 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    According to an article on Home - acig.org written by Tom Cooper, the rounds obtained by PAF with Mirages prior to 1971 war included the radar-guided R-530s. Now Tom Cooper is someone I want to trust but he may be wrong. However, Tom Cooper has written many excellent articles on military aviation and seems credible.

    On the site pakdef, there is a list of kills of 1971, and we can see some kills of R-530 but they did not mention whether it was radar or IR version of R-530.

  11. #221
    THINK TANK shehbazi2001's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    576
    Thanked
    492 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    Mountain or Ridge Crossing at Low Level

    While playing a simulation, I came across an interesting method to cross a ridge or mountain while maintaining the low-level profile.

    If we stick close to the ground (remain low) on one side of the mountain/hill/ridge, the aircraft shall go to unacceptable high altitude on the other side of the hill.

    If we want to remain low on the other side of the hill, we shall have to fly a bit high at start and expose ourselves......

    So what can be a solution to remain at low-level all the time while crossing a hill????? (I know it already, its just for discussion)

  12. #222
    FULL MEMBERS Alex_2008's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6
    Thanked
    0 times
    Users Country Flag: China

    Smile Virtual Fighting of PAF's JF-17

    Hope our Pakistani brother will like it.
    С°ÍèÉÁú´óÕ½ËÕ30-Ã×¶û¾üÊÂÊÓÆµ

  13. #223
    THINK TANK araz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    london UK
    Posts
    3,158
    Thanked
    2675 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: UK

    Default Re: Virtual Fighting of PAF's JF-17

    Alex
    Thank you very much for this video. It has been posted before .
    Regards
    Araz

  14. #224
    Banned Members p2prada's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    481
    Thanked
    23 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread

    PAF officials said the H-4 missiles which was an infra-red device and comparable to that of the AA11, AA12 and Python 4 missiles of the IAF would be fitted on to the PAF's Mirage aircraft until the induction of new plane JF-17 Thunder, jointly developed by Pakistan and China, in 2006.
    I dont understand and i m throughly confused.

    According to what u posted the H-4 is a BVR with IR seeker which means it is actually a short range missile with 120km range. Also, it is comparable to AA-11(range=30km) and Python-4(range=15km) which are short range and also comaprable to the R-77(range=90km) which is BVR.


    So, which is it.

  15. #225
    Banned Members p2prada's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    481
    Thanked
    23 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: India

    Default Re: Air Force Question Thread



    Quote Originally Posted by shehbazi2001 View Post
    According to an article on Home - acig.org written by Tom Cooper, the rounds obtained by PAF with Mirages prior to 1971 war included the radar-guided R-530s. Now Tom Cooper is someone I want to trust but he may be wrong. However, Tom Cooper has written many excellent articles on military aviation and seems credible.

    On the site pakdef, there is a list of kills of 1971, and we can see some kills of R-530 but they did not mention whether it was radar or IR version of R-530.
    I have heard of kills using the sidewinder on the sabres and starfighters.

    they did not mention whether it was radar or IR version of R-530.
    I guess it was the infrared version.
    the radar version came out in 1979. Only the BVR version is radar guided, ie the super 530F and 530D. the only IR version is the R-530.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Question....
    By Keysersoze in forum Social Issues & Current Events
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-18-2007, 03:00 AM
  2. A QUESTION
    By NIDAR in forum Members Introduction
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-12-2007, 10:57 PM
  3. Pakistan Air Force not advising the Sri Lanka Air Force
    By WebMaster in forum Pakistan Air Force
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-29-2007, 08:27 PM
  4. fc-1 question
    By master_fx in forum Pakistan Defence & Industry
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-08-2006, 06:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •