Pakistan Defence
Page 12 of 447 FirstFirst ... 234567891011121314151617181920212262112 ... LastLast
Results 166 to 180 of 6695
Thanks Tree5173Thanks

Chengdu: J-10/FC-20 Multirole Fighter Air Craft




  1. #166
    SENIOR MEMBERS kvLin's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    760
    Thanked
    134 times
    Users Country Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA



    Quote Originally Posted by Keysersoze View Post
    Because...

    1)PAF has operated the f-16 for years. It will not require as much induction.
    2)It is still technologically more advanced than the J-10 currently,which will probably be fitted out with western tech anyway.
    3)The cost of 100+ new jets and western tech for it, would very expensive as well.
    4) It is better to rely upon more than one source as history has proven.
    complements:
    1) J-10 is built against F-16, and commonly recognized to confront F-16C/D.
    2) Pakistan will buy weapons from USA to meet both its diplomatic and technical needs.

  2. #167
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    85 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    J-10 is in no position to confront the F-16 C/D Block 52+

  3. #168
    THINK TANK Muradk's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,534
    Thanked
    3505 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by Adux View Post
    J-10 is in no position to confront the F-16 C/D Block 52+
    Adux for you my friend.












  4. #169
    FULL MEMBERS mirage_lover's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    49
    Thanked
    0 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by WebMaster View Post
    Dude read the whole thread.

    And stop looking at your post count.

    Weapon station: 11

    Internal payload: I dont know. What the heck is that? Does it matter?

    http://www.aeronautics.ru/news/news002/news095.htm
    I wasn't looking at my post count. It's hard to look through SO MUCH info for a small phrase.
    Internal payload as in, storage for unguided bombs inside the belly of the aircraft
    sorry for the trouble thanx for info.

  5. #170
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    85 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    [QUOTE=Muradk;65481]Adux for you my friend.

    [/QOUTE]

    Sir,

    Aerodynamically, I do believe it might succeed a 52++, especially since it comes with conformal tanks, which reduces aerodynamic performance. But to say J-10 will match the mission, payload, range, avionics. capacity of the 52++ is just not done. The Best aircraft in PAF Airwing will be 52++ not the J-10.

  6. #171
    FULL MEMBERS mxiong's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    China
    Posts
    163
    Thanked
    12 times
    Users Country Flag: China Users Location Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    [QUOTE=Adux;65504]
    Quote Originally Posted by Muradk View Post
    Adux for you my friend.

    [/QOUTE]

    Sir,

    Aerodynamically, I do believe it might succeed a 52++, especially since it comes with conformal tanks, which reduces aerodynamic performance. But to say J-10 will match the mission, payload, range, avionics. capacity of the 52++ is just not done. The Best aircraft in PAF Airwing will be 52++ not the J-10.
    Right now F-16 post-Block50/52 might have its edge in various BI/SEAD/AR missions, but regarding air-superiority "confrontation" J-10 will kick the living **** out of the latest variant of F-16 nevertheless.

  7. #172
    FULL MEMBERS Sgt. Automatic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    11
    Thanked
    0 times
    Users Country Flag: Canada

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Is the latest version of F-16 (blk 52) better than F-15E's in air supermacy, if not then how does J-10 stand beside an F-15E. From what I know F-15's were better than F-16s up to blk 30, I don't know after that.

  8. #173
    ADMINISTRATORS WebMaster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    16,086
    Thanked
    8419 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    On air supremecy scheme it all comes down to an effective radar (including jamming capability) and advanced medium range missiles. Where i think F-15 wins hands down but then again if J-10 too has an AESA radar, you have an equal match. Also do note that quite a few anti-missiles technology has been developed by China for American air to air missiles.

  9. #174
    FULL MEMBERS mxiong's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    China
    Posts
    163
    Thanked
    12 times
    Users Country Flag: China Users Location Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    F-15E "Strike Eagle" is mainly for ground attack, whereas F-15C fights for air superiority. F-15 w/ AESA is better than current J-10, but the upcoming twin-engine variant of J-10 w/ AESA + TVC + low observability will be able to confront not just F-15, but even F-35 and F-22.

  10. #175
    SENIOR MEMBERS Interceptor's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    2,035
    Thanked
    113 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United Kingdom

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    China launches new stealth fighter project

    10 December 2002

    By Yihong Chang, JDW Correspondent, Zhuhai

    Shenyang Aircraft CompanyThe Shenyang Aircraft Company has been selected to head research and development of a new heavyweight fighter for China's People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF), according to a senior source at the China Aviation Industry Corp I (AVIC I).

    Development of the engines and weapon subsystems for the fourth-generation fighter has been underway for some time, according to the source, who revealed that a number of design concepts have already been created. Wind-tunnel tests of these are about to start. Images of the concepts show a twin-engine aircraft sharing some design traits with Lockheed Martin's stealthy F/A-22 multirole fighter, now undergoing tests with the US Air Force, such as the internal carriage of its weapon systems. The Chinese designs retain a more conventional wing, however, and use a single vertical tail fin.

    AVIC I officials told JDW that the new aircraft - tentatively dubbed the J-X and possibly to receive the service designation J-13A - could use the WS10A turbofan engine designed by the Shenyang Liming Motor Company during its development and trials process.

    In development for more than a decade, the WS10-series powerplant completed air trials earlier this year with an Su-27SK (NATO reporting name: 'Flanker-B') fighter. The WS10A is scheduled for introduction with the PLAAF's new J-10A fighter, which has yet to be formally unveiled.

    Continuing research into advanced control techniques is expected to in time allow the air force to field WS10A-powered J-10A and J-X fighters equipped with thrust-vectoring nozzles offering improved aircraft manoeuvrability.

    While AVIC I sources will not speculate when the new fighter might make its first test flight, a debut around the end of the decade could be expected if the project matches the development process for China's J-10A and J-8D projects.



    http://www.janes.com/defence/air_for...1210_2_n.shtml

    Old but relevent to the topic.

  11. #176
    JK!
    JK! is offline
    PROFESSIONALS JK!'s Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    FOB (insertnamehere)
    Posts
    1,350
    Thanked
    323 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: UK

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    F15 was built in response to Soviet MiG 25 foxbat.

    Against say MiG 29 it has a disadvantage in dogfighting. Its advantage is more thrust and powerful radar.

  12. #177
    ADMINISTRATORS WebMaster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    16,086
    Thanked
    8419 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    ‘PAF to modernise fleet’

    ISLAMABAD: Air Chief Martial Tanveer Mehmood Ahmed has said that more than 300 warrior aircrafts, missiles and an early warning system will be acquired at a cost of $ 9 billion to modernise the Pakistan Air Force.

    In an interview with a private TV channel, Tanveer Mehmood Ahmed said Pakistan Air Force plans to modernise its fleet by replacing aging aircrafts with more than 300 multi-roll combat aircrafts including the American F-16s and Chinese JF-17 thunder fighter jets and J-10 aircrafts over the next few years.

    He further said, “We are looking forward to changing most of our Mirage, A-5 and F-7 aircrafts which total number touched to the figure of two hundred and fifty.

    Talking about the difference between a JF-17 and a SE-20 aircraft, the air chief said, “The basic difference between the JF-17 and SE-20 is that the latter is slightly bigger in size, however, it has greater capacity to carry more weapon load and more fuel and it has more endurance. So, its radar will be bigger and, therefore, the ability to attack enemy target will be longer. It has more stations to carry more air-to-air missiles and air-to-ground weapons and also has air-to-air refuelling capability.” online

    Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

  13. #178
    ADMINISTRATORS WebMaster's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    16,086
    Thanked
    8419 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Notice the change in name. SE-20, now what the heck is that? Why is the media keep changing the aircrafts name. Also it says a total $9 billion will be spent in the modernization of the Pakistan Air Force alone!

  14. #179
    FULL MEMBERS Ababeel's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    U.A.E.
    Posts
    888
    Thanked
    581 times
    Users Country Flag: Bangladesh Users Location Flag: United Arab Emirates

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    What is this SE-20 Aircraft!!
    What is its earlier name. I didn't understand to which aircraft he is somparing the JF-17 Thunder.
    Please explain!!

  15. #180
    FULL MEMBERS master_fx's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    474
    Thanked
    14 times
    Users Country Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA



    Quote Originally Posted by mxiong View Post
    F-15E "Strike Eagle" is mainly for ground attack, whereas F-15C fights for air superiority. F-15 w/ AESA is better than current J-10, but the upcoming twin-engine variant of J-10 w/ AESA + TVC + low observability will be able to confront not just F-15, but even F-35 and F-22.
    get real! there is no dual engine J-10 nor in development. the heavy air superior fighter role has already being fill up by the Su-27 and Su-30. Plus PLAAF has already spend much its $$$ and energy to license produce and modify Su-27, the development for another fighter of this class will be a complete waste of time and money.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 10257
    Last Post: 04-28-2013, 07:34 PM
  2. UAE wants SU 35 Multirole fighter jet
    By Super Falcon in forum Pakistan Air Force
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 12:23 AM
  3. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 3852
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 12:47 PM
  4. Su-30MKI (Flanker-H) multirole fighter
    By Lankan Ranger in forum Military Photos & Multimedia
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-28-2010, 10:07 PM
  5. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 2]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 1450
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 12:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •