Pakistan Defence
Page 8 of 445 FirstFirst 12345678910111213141516171858108 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 6668
Thanks Tree5162Thanks

Chengdu: J-10/FC-20 Multirole Fighter Air Craft




  1. #106
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    82 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA



    Quote Originally Posted by mxiong View Post
    PLAAF has conducted both field exercise and computer simulation and J-10 had excellent exchange ratio w/ J-11(Su-27SK w/ upgraded avionics) as 1:2 and a even better 1:4 w/ Su-30MKK. So I believe the exchange ratio b/t J-10 and Su-30MKI is approx. 1:1.2~1.5.
    It was a Su-27, And I dont believe them I rather take neutral views.
    Just for a Taster;Do you know the your SU-30MKK and Su-27 carriers a N001 Radar while a Su-30 MKI carries a BARS PESA.

    Now Stop feeding CPC Propaganda, and give me the accurate details of the avionics, performance, parameters of the J-10 and I will give you the exact details of Su-30MKI with all source, Dont tell me about any if's and wishful thinking. And lets have a debate.

  2. #107
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    82 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by kidwaibhai View Post
    Yeah i do think that j-10 is not that close to the SU-30. But i do think that the chinese are getting really close maybe in the next 10-12 years. Dont worry after that we will kick *** all over the place
    Quite right, But I will give it 15-25 years. You do have to understand that along with China moving forward, the other countries are also moving forward.

  3. #108
    FULL MEMBERS mxiong's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    China
    Posts
    163
    Thanked
    12 times
    Users Country Flag: China Users Location Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by Adux View Post
    It was a Su-27, And I dont believe them I rather take neutral views.
    Just for a Taster;Do you know the your SU-30MKK and Su-27 carriers a N001 Radar while a Su-30 MKI carries a BARS PESA.

    Now Stop feeding CPC Propaganda, and give me the accurate details of the avionics, performance, parameters of the J-10 and I will give you the exact details of Su-30MKI with all source, Dont tell me about any if's and wishful thinking. And lets have a debate.
    I would like to silence you resistance with facts. But unfortunately the detalied specification of J-10 is still classified. Maybe we can have a better debate once J-10 twin-engine or "stealth" variants come out.
    Last edited by mxiong; 03-16-2007 at 12:09 PM.

  4. #109
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    82 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by mxiong View Post
    I would like to silence you resistance with facts. But unfortunately the detalied specification of J-10 is still classified. Maybe we can have a beeter debate once J-10 twin-engine or "stealth" variants come out.
    Ok dude, well and good. have a nice day. Also dont forget about the X-Wing Space Fighter

  5. #110
    FULL MEMBERS mxiong's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    China
    Posts
    163
    Thanked
    12 times
    Users Country Flag: China Users Location Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by Adux View Post
    Ok dude, well and good. have a nice day. Also dont forget about the X-Wing Space Fighter
    Thanks. We are working on its conceptual design as well

  6. #111
    pg7
    pg7 is offline
    FULL MEMBERS pg7's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16
    Thanked
    0 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    On one to one basis, su-30mki is far more superior to oof our present or future assets. But indopak scenario is not going to be on one to one basis.Given the situation, j-10 can hold its ground. PAF should really look most advanced Chinese and Europian air defence assets to really compensate indian threat of mig-27. Once it happens, indians can be stretched to limits. Moreover, our arab brethern always look to most advanced assets in the world and can never keep them in the state desired. In order to develop your own infrastructure and to produce highly skilled manpower, we need to have experiments with medium technology fighters/equipment. In this regard, Chinese euipment has helped our strategic organizations a lot. We successfully use our western assets to improve the chinese one. Moreover, expanding ties with countries like Ukraine, South Africa, Italy , Germany and France can pay dividends in combination with China. We need to rely as minimum as possible on us, england and russia. This will keep us away from hurdles and sanctions etc. American are in every likelihood certain to sanction pakistan in any difficult times of conflicts likely to happen.

  7. #112
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    82 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Pg7,

    Numbers are in the favour of IAF and technology too.

    Are you talking about the SEAD capability of the Mig-27 or was that a Typo.

    ps: lets not derail the thread,this is a J-10 thread, so lets keep that in prespective on our debates.

  8. #113
    FULL MEMBERS morind's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    15
    Thanked
    0 times
    Users Country Flag: China

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    I'd like to offer some vedios of J-10,but I don't know how to upload,so I have only to list the links that can be download to get watched.
    mms://nv.sina.com.cn/news/2006/12/29643676.wmv
    it was the vedio when J-10 was firstly revealed in CCTV's central news.12.29.2006
    mms://nv.sina.com.cn/news/2006/12/29841400.wmv
    it was the vedio of lengthened version in CCTV's news channal
    mms://winmedia.cctv.com.cn/wwwwxinwe...0070105_16.wmv
    it was the vedio displayed in CCTV news channal in 1.5.2007
    Last edited by morind; 03-16-2007 at 02:46 PM. Reason: easy to brownse

  9. #114
    ELITE MEMBERS Bull's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6,932
    Thanked
    251 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Well as of now i guess Pak plans to induct 150 JF-17 at a rate of 12-13 planes a year, the intial 30 might be the basic fighters and remaind miht be the one with eurpoean avionics and aramaments. As PAF cant wait for the entrie negotiations to end to start inducting. They may only get the J-10 after they finish the quota of 150 JF-17, bcoz i think PAC wont be having spare capacity to make / assemble J -10s.

    1. Would PLAAF be able to give PAF some 20 - 30 readymade J-10s, would they have spare production capacity.

    2. Are the JF-17 going to be made in PAC or assembled? If Assembled wouldnt that slow down the production rate as China would have to produce parts for both PLAAF and PAF at the same time?

  10. #115
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    82 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Bull,

    We still have the Engine Issue...

  11. #116
    ELITE MEMBERS Bull's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    6,932
    Thanked
    251 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Imagine if they have that solved.

  12. #117
    SENIOR MEMBERS Janbaz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario
    Posts
    1,372
    Thanked
    75 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Canada

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by Adux View Post
    SAudi's are getting the Eurofighter's
    Nope, the order was canclled. There was a thread in here somewhere. I am dead certain.

  13. #118
    SENIOR MEMBERS Adux's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,985
    Thanked
    82 times
    Users Country Flag: India

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by Janbaz View Post
    Nope, the order was canclled. There was a thread in here somewhere. I am dead certain.
    They had a corruption problem with the BaE, but now the House of commons agreed on it and cleard it. It is the Typhoon.

  14. #119
    Neo
    Neo is offline
    RETIRED Neo's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    264
    Thanked
    3880 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA

    Quote Originally Posted by Bull View Post
    Well as of now i guess Pak plans to induct 150 JF-17 at a rate of 12-13 planes a year, the intial 30 might be the basic fighters and remaind miht be the one with eurpoean avionics and aramaments. As PAF cant wait for the entrie negotiations to end to start inducting. They may only get the J-10 after they finish the quota of 150 JF-17, bcoz i think PAC wont be having spare capacity to make / assemble J -10s.
    New facility at PAC is designed to handle 20-25 airframes per annum. During the first year 15 Thunders will be built but production will peak 2009 already as stated by Tanvir Mahmood.
    PAF will finally get 200+ JF-17's, 150 is just a projected figure based on PAF requirements almost ten years ago.

    1. Would PLAAF be able to give PAF some 20 - 30 readymade J-10s, would they have spare production capacity.
    Probably so. Chinese aviotion industry can absorb excellerated delivery and production rate is already high.
    I believe first 8 J-10's were handed over to PLAAF for flight testing in 2004. The number built sofar is more than 100...

    2. Are the JF-17 going to be made in PAC or assembled? If Assembled wouldnt that slow down the production rate as China would have to produce parts for both PLAAF and PAF at the same time?
    By 2009 we'll have realised full production capacity of producing 20-25 aircrafts.
    Half the spares will be built by China the rest by Pakistani industry.
    Some contracts are already known. Taxilla Heavy Industry will play a leading role.

  15. #120
    SENIOR MEMBERS Keysersoze's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,133
    Thanked
    545 times
    Users Country Flag: UK Users Location Flag: UK

    Default re: J-10/FC-20 MRCA



    Quote Originally Posted by Adux View Post
    Bull,

    We still have the Engine Issue...
    The engine issue, I believe will not be an issue at all. The first few JF-17's obviously have Russian engines (When they fly on the 23rd march they smoke trail will confirm this.) If the Russians do nothing then you will have an answer.

    Long duration testing on the WS-13 was being undertaken a while back (I don't have the link to hand but I believe Dragonking posted it somewhere on here) so by next year or even this eyar it will no longer be a problem.

    As for the J-10 the Chinese will have more than enough production lines (I read that they can produce at full capacity approx 50 a year.)


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 10257
    Last Post: 04-28-2013, 07:34 PM
  2. UAE wants SU 35 Multirole fighter jet
    By Super Falcon in forum Pakistan Air Force
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 12:23 AM
  3. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 3]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 3852
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 12:47 PM
  4. Su-30MKI (Flanker-H) multirole fighter
    By Lankan Ranger in forum Military Photos & Multimedia
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-28-2010, 10:07 PM
  5. JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 2]
    By WebMaster in forum JF-17 Thunder
    Replies: 1450
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 12:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •