Pakistan Defence
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 59
Thanks Tree26Thanks

Body Armour




  1. #1
    SENIOR MEMBERS persona_non_grata's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Daddy Dhabi
    Posts
    3,785
    Thanked
    2929 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default Body Armour



    Body armor has been used by armies since times immemorial .......
    We see the romans, Greeks and other medieval and middle age armies sporting body Armour of various sorts......

    I have rarely heard of body Armour used since the arrival if the musket. I mean soldiers in the 18th / 19th century, both world wars ... Korea ... Vietnam ....... 65 / 71 ... Kargil wars ....... I have not seen any type of body armour used by soldiers in these conflicts.

    My first encounter with modern kevlar vests was during the American raid in Somalia ..... Now you see almost every western soldier an police officer equiped with one.

    My question is were muskets/ rifles deemed too powerful to make any type of body amour effective OR were trenches, foxholes thought of as sufficient protection against all types of projectiles.

    Regards
    Varigeo

  2. #2
    SENIOR MEMBERS su-47's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Gaborone
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanked
    1231 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: Botswana

    Default re: Body Armour

    Quote Originally Posted by varigeo View Post
    Body armor has been used by armies since times immemorial .......
    We see the romans, Greeks and other medieval and middle age armies sporting body Armour of various sorts......

    I have rarely heard of body Armour used since the arrival if the musket. I mean soldiers in the 18th / 19th century, both world wars ... Korea ... Vietnam ....... 65 / 71 ... Kargil wars ....... I have not seen any type of body armour used by soldiers in these conflicts.

    My first encounter with modern kevlar vests was during the American raid in Somalia ..... Now you see almost every western soldier an police officer equiped with one.

    My question is were muskets/ rifles deemed too powerful to make any type of body amour effective OR were trenches, foxholes thought of as sufficient protection against all types of projectiles.

    Regards
    Varigeo
    when muskets/ rifles were introduced, the existing body armour ie steel armour worn by knights was insufficient to stop a bullet. till the invention of kevlar, there was no materila light enough to be worn by an infantryman that could stop a rifle bullet.

    so troops didnt wear body armour till the modern day simply because there was nothing that could be worn to stop a bullet. it was not due to a lack of desire for protection.
    persona_non_grata and rubyjackass thanked this.

  3. #3
    THINK TANK RescueRanger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    GraveYard Shift.
    Posts
    2,900
    Thanked
    3729 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: Body Armour

    Correction:

    Gremans used ceramic plates in WWII, will try to find the link so really it was a work in progress that was perfected post vietnam...

  4. #4
    SENIOR MEMBERS su-47's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Gaborone
    Posts
    2,484
    Thanked
    1231 times
    Users Country Flag: India Users Location Flag: Botswana

    Default re: Body Armour

    Quote Originally Posted by RescueRanger View Post
    Correction:

    Gremans used ceramic plates in WWII, will try to find the link so really it was a work in progress that was perfected post vietnam...
    sorry i didnt make my post more clear. what i meant was troops didn't use body armour on a large scale.

    the ceramic plates you mentioned were probably too cumbersome, too expensive or simply not effective enough. whatever the reason, it wasn't mass produced.

  5. #5
    THINK TANK RescueRanger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    GraveYard Shift.
    Posts
    2,900
    Thanked
    3729 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: Body Armour

    Quote Originally Posted by su-47 View Post
    sorry i didnt make my post more clear. what i meant was troops didn't use body armour on a large scale.

    the ceramic plates you mentioned were probably too cumbersome, too expensive or simply not effective enough. whatever the reason, it wasn't mass produced.
    Oh yeah totally aggree, infact even the old Flak vests issued in Vietnam were too cumbersom and heavy to wear during operations, until they finally came up with the m69 flak vest.

  6. #6
    PDF VETERAN Imran Khan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    islamabad
    Posts
    19,339
    Thanked
    24652 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: Body Armour

    old days



    new days

    persona_non_grata thanked this.

  7. #7
    SENIOR MEMBERS Keysersoze's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,133
    Thanked
    545 times
    Users Country Flag: UK Users Location Flag: UK

    Default re: Body Armour

    Bear in mind that the picture of the suit of armour shown would have in actuality quite thin steel (or equivalent) curved and shaped to enhance its strength against sword and arrow blows.

  8. #8
    THINK TANK RescueRanger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    GraveYard Shift.
    Posts
    2,900
    Thanked
    3729 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: Body Armour

    I am such a big fan of medevil armour, especially full tin plate Knight Armour.

    Here is the future of modern combat armour:



    It's called the Trojan Body Suit and provides Level IIIA protection to the user, an integrated thermal imaging camera, head lamp, Air Fed Supply, and ceramic plating around the critical points.

    If you google it you should be able to get additional info.

  9. #9
    ELITE MEMBERS Super Falcon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    7,179
    Thanked
    1221 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: Body Armour

    what tye of body armour that indian and pakistan army is using

  10. #10
    FULL MEMBERS tamir's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    335
    Thanked
    225 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: Body Armour

    Don't know exactly what the specs are for the Indian Army. Pakistan Army is using Level IIIA soft armor with Level III inserts. The Pakistan Army has preferred woven ballistic fabric over non woven HPPE like Spectra and Dyneema.
    In the mid 90's a large order was placed for body armor. The order was split between Lightweight Body Armour (LBA) UK and Ballistic Body Armour, South Africa. Both companies supplied Level III ceramic plates weighing 2.7 kgs each.
    I got into the body armor business in 1999. Bad timing because of the nuclear tests and sanctions that followed. The vests being supplied now have Dyneema Level III stand alone plates weighing only 1.3 kgs.
    The Chinese have been pushing their HPPE ballistic material which is half the cost of Aramid but the quality is not consistent. The Chinese copied Dyneema and invited DSM corporate heads to China for a tour and wanted DSM to license their product. DSM wasn't very happy with this and filed a lawsuit and recently won the case.
    A few local companies tried manufacturing PASGT Level IIIA helmets. Not to name any names, one company was blacklisted and the other main competitor gave up on the project. Air Weapons Complex has been manufacturing helmets.

    I know for a fact that the Punjab Police and the Rangers have heavier vests because they are Level IIIA+ soft armor. Most common handgun is the Russian/Chinese variant of the Tokarev 7.62x25mm (TT). This ammo (steel core) easily penetrates Level IIIA armor. Just to give you an idea.... Level IIIA NIJ certified vest with 32 plies of Kevlar defeats 44 magnum and 9mm SMG rounds with 34-40mm back face trauma. We needed 54 plies of Kevlar to defeat the Tokarev round.

    Hope this information helps.
    dk33, S-2, persona_non_grata and 3 others thanked this.

  11. #11
    FULL MEMBERS m15t3r7's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    united states
    Posts
    140
    Thanked
    27 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: Body Armour

    have any body heard of dragon skin it a good body Armour


    i think Pakistan should look in to it
    go on youtube check it out

  12. #12
    SENIOR MEMBERS Mark Sien's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,080
    Thanked
    937 times
    Users Country Flag: Canada

    Default re: Body Armour

    Widespread use with the Army will take some time, there are other things to work on such as individual communication devices, night-vision & thermal imaging to relevent units, etc. Fact that armor designs keep changing and keep improving, the PA cannot procure a huge amount in one go, it has to do it in phases.
    Jihad thanked this.

  13. #13
    FULL MEMBERS tamir's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    335
    Thanked
    225 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: Body Armour

    Dragon Skin is a good product. Two major draw backs when considering Dragon Skin for the Pakistan Army. 1... heavier than traditional vest because it is providing more Level III coverage. 2. Expensive compared to traditional vests. Last order I remember Pakistan Army got Level III vests with Dyneema inserts for approx. $600.

    Thermal imaging and communications hardware have been on the Pak Army's shopping list.

  14. #14
    FULL MEMBERS ALi Rizwan's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    88
    Thanked
    12 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan

    Default re: Body Armour

    Quote Originally Posted by tamir View Post
    Air Weapons Complex has been manufacturing helmets.
    & Bullet-Proof Jacket

    BULLET PROOF HELMET & JACKET

    Description
    The Advanced Composites Research Center at Air Weapons Complex has carried out extensive research on bullet-proof materials. Using indigenous technology, AWC has developed lightweight composite Bullet-proof Jackets and Helmets that provide exceptional battlefield protection. At the same time, the unique design features facilitate body and head movement while aiming, crawling and running.
    The Bullet-proof Jackets and Helmets developed by AWC provide protection against ammunition according to NIG Standard 0101.03.

    Bullet-Proof Helmet (Level III A)

    Specific layers of biaxial woven kevlar fabric have been integrated in polymeric resin. The fabric/resin has been cured in a specific mould under high temperature and pressure for specific time duration. After de-molding, trimming and painting, webbing is attached to the Helmet.

    Bullet-Proof Jacket (Level III A & Level III)

    Specific layers of biaxial woven kevlar fabric have been stitched in diamond pattern. The trauma pack is an integral part of the ballistic insert. The assembly is stitched in water/moisture-resistant black plastic to maintain its ballistic properties. This effectively stops the 9mm bullet. The Jacket can stop the 7.62mm bullet after insertion of front and back laminated ceramic plate. The outer cover is made of washable 100% cotton camouflage twill.

    advantages of kevlar fabric

    High tensile strength/modules
    High toughness
    Light weight
    Excellent retention of strength at elevated temperatures
    High thermal stability
    Self extinguishing
    Cut resistant
    Good chemical resistance


    test firing

    Bullet-Proof Helmet


    The Helmet was fired at from a distance of 5m by 9mm caliber sub-machine gun ammunition at ballistic test facilities of Air Weapons Complex and Inspectorate of Armaments, Rawalpindi, in accordance with NIJ standard 0101.01. The Helmet stopped the bullet effectively. The average trauma effect was found to be within limits. The Helmet was also tested under wet conditions. The wet tests did not deteriorate the results.

    Bullet-Proof Jacket

    The Jacket was fired at from a distance of 5m by 9mm and 7.62mm caliber ammunition at ballistic test facilities of Air Weapons Complex and Inspectorate of Armaments, Rawalpindi, in accordance with NIJ standard 0101.01. The Jacket stopped both types of bullets effectively with nominal trauma effect.

    salient features

    Bullet-Proof Helmet


    Protection Level III A (against 9mm ammunition)
    Material Kevlar
    Resin Material Polymeric
    Color Optional
    Webbing Cotton
    Ballistic Visor Optional
    Weight 1.4 Kg


    Bullet-Proof Jacket

    Protection Level
    Without Ceramic plate III A (against 9mm ammunition)
    With Ceramic plate III(against7.62mm ammunition)
    Material Kevlar
    Trauma Pack Polymeric
    Ballistic Insert Laminated Ceramic
    Outer Cover Camouflage Khaki Twill
    Collars Integrated
    Pelvic Flaps Optional
    Weight 2.8 Kg

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    © Copyright Air Weapons Complex 2001
    rubyjackass thanked this.

  15. #15
    FULL MEMBERS tamir's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    335
    Thanked
    225 times
    Users Country Flag: Pakistan Users Location Flag: United States

    Default re: Body Armour



    These are old Army specs from the mid 90's. The vests are much lighter now. Inserts have much better multi hit performance. Vest standard has upgraded to NIJ Standard 0101.04.
    A.Rahman and rubyjackass thanked this.


Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. SAAB’s approach to Armour in Indian desert
    By abdulrafi in forum Indian Defence
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-29-2009, 11:36 AM
  2. hi every body !
    By the saint in forum Members Introduction
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 09:56 PM
  3. US alarmed by Chinese armour-piercing ammunition
    By gpit in forum Chinese Defence
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-29-2007, 04:59 PM
  4. Hello to every body
    By metalkat77 in forum Members Introduction
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 04:02 AM
  5. hello every body
    By genmirajborgza786 in forum Members Club
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 10:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •