Pak Navy Interest in Chineese Sub & Frigates

[ChineseTiger1986]

---

---

I was about to do the same thing but from the fear of trolling i buried it , i think the best way to avoid him is to ignore his posts, let him say wateva hi wishes and let the mods come into play

Agree with you bro.

[DARKY]

If the SSGN can carry up to 154 Tomahawk CMs, then 30 CJ-10Ks is possible for Qing class SSK.

All I can say is pathetic more so as you being a senior member merely justify an absurd claim on the basis of if that has why can't this.

Nuclear subs housing 154 THs have 24000-28000 displacement while your sub has around 3000-3500 if I am not wrong.
Stop fooling Pakistani member and better be reasonable.

[Adios Amigo]

All I can say is pathetic more so as you being a senior member merely justify an absurd claim on the basis of if that has why can't this.

Nuclear subs housing 154 THs have 24000-28000 displacement while your sub has around 3000-3500 if I am not wrong.
Stop fooling Pakistani member and better be reasonable.

Did somebody just jump on your tail????


The same could have been said in far less offending tone!




Adios!

[ChineseTiger1986]

All I can say is pathetic more so as you being a senior member merely justify an absurd claim on the basis of if that has why can't this.

Nuclear subs housing 154 THs have 24000-28000 displacement while your sub has around 3000-3500 if I am not wrong.
Stop fooling Pakistani member and better be reasonable.

The Ohio class SSGN is around 18,000 tons submerged, which is around 5 times larger than the Qing class SSK, thus it can carry five times more of CMs.

Check the stat before quoting me wrong.

[DARKY]

Did somebody just jump on your tail????


The same could have been said in far less offending tone!




Adios!

No offence buddy but I was watching his comments from long time and I guess you can see also what he was doing

[DARKY]

The Ohio class SSGN is around 18,000 tons submerged, which is around 5 times larger than the Qing SSK, thus it can carry five times more of CMs.

Check the stat before quoting me wrong.

Lets not derail the topic, another day another time for sure...!!

[Xracer]

Okay the deal is signed but what is delivery date.lets hope delivery come soon

[razgriz19]

Okay the deal is signed but what is delivery date.lets hope delivery come soon

there is no official confirmation yet. let alone the deal!

[flameboard]

Also Pakistan has signed a deal for 2 type 054A frigates on a 10 year lease .
Y0454A Frigates The other exciting development is Pakistan has also signed a deal for a 10 year leaso of 2 Type o54A FFGs. The two ships that Pakistan will receive are serial number 525 and 526 inducted in PLAN in 2005

]There is also news that China will be transferring two Z9-EC helicopters.

Picture of the actual frigates check the numbers

526


525

[razgriz19]

Picture of the actual frigates check the numbers

526


525

and both of them are Type 54, not Type 54A........
well it would still give much needed boost to our navy's capabilities.

[AsianUnion]

Old American OHP class perry frigates...:

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

The 525 looks a magnificent ship if just built in 2005 almost brand new a wonderful platform to get going with bigger ship , and it will give our Navy a good starting ground , mean while we must keep constructing F22P frigates for our navies


F22P
F-251 PNS Zulfiqar
F-252 PNS Shamsheer
F-253 PNS Saif
F-254 PNS Aslat
1????
2????
3????
4????

OHP
PNS Alamgir
1????
2????
3????
4????

Eixisting fleet
F181 PNS Tariq
F182 PNS Babur
F183 PNS Khaibar
F184 PNS Badr
F185 PNS Shah Jahan
F186 PNS Tippu Sultan



Plus 2 new destroyers just 2-3 years old on lease
Type 054A
Type 054A

Submarines
3 Agosta Submarines
PNS/M Khalid
PNS/M Saad
PNS/M Hamza


Chinese subs (Much needed enhancement)
1 ???
2 ???
3 ???
4 ???
5 ???
6 ???

Now once these ??? are filled with ships/subs I would definitely say yes I think this is a great defensive navy for Pakistan's coastal waters - sufficient , strong and able to provide assistance to local / near by operations

[alimobin memon]

they might get type54A upgrade then transferred!!

[khurasaan1]

Bro as much military news i follow, i must say, i wouldn't buy F-22 even if US offered it to me. Reason being their entire fleet is grounded these days for repairing an oxygen generator on board. With that kind of issues in a 200 million $ plane....i think i would buy some MIGs, Typhoons or Rafale....for the price of one F-22 i could buy so much more which would actually deliver. Remember to date F-22s have not been used in any combat, not even in libya, which means that F-22s certainly don't have any positive record to their name......the cards are stacked against it.

yea! this plane just been used in the movies......only......and its a movie star....

[Arsalan]

---

---

let me again point out that this is premature to start thw celabrations as nothing is reported on any credible source.

i can see some very senior members here on this forum showing excitment, can anyone please guide me to some source of this news.

this have been discussed in detail in:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/naval-f...nes-china.html
http://www.defence.pk/forums/naval-f...n-u-214-a.html
and the conclusion was that PN is really dried up of funds. in this case, i dont see such id deals being signed.

taimikhan, any link to source or can anyone else help me with this!

Arsalan Aslam