With this 2c802's,sd10,2wvr ok ..... but what abt multiple ejector racks?
neverthe less y point was to show jf-17 multi-role capablites and to clarify that JF-17 is as potent in naval role as in any other role. so it will be wastage of money and difficulty in operation to add new platforms.
thats one reason i am against J-11
SO J-11 Like a FAST FOOD BURGER ready in 10 minutes
Well, I think other than negating the naval blockade, Thunder, in Naval role, would ensure the complete denial of any hostile amphibious landing on Pakistani shores.
may be the pakistan navy will add jf-17 thunder
navy in past has shown interst in acquiring jf-17
JF17 naval version is not produced yet i think but it would be close to MIG29K right
jf-17 must be modified in later blocks
Anti Sub role/Anti Ship
Breguet Atlantic - 6 Delivered in 2011
P3 Orions - 5
Anti Ship Operations:
12 Mirages (Excocet Enabled)
Needed 36 JF17 thunder in Multi Role capacity (Anti Ship plus support for protecting assets)
Air Support for Ships
What Pakistan Certainly need is J11 Fleet of 36 to really compliment the existing fleet
Last edited by AZADPAKISTAN2009; 02-20-2012 at 09:42 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)