I suspect India already has more nuclear weapons than pakistan as well as more advanced nuclear technology. Comparing their nuclear potential, I come to this conclusion.
However, it is pakistan's nukes which gets international attention and are exaggerated in the media for obvious reasons. India prefers to stay in the sideline.
India already has an operational Ballistic missile defence rite ?
Nuclear sea mines are a reality. If I may - let me update your research, sir:
The U.S. Navy once had nuclear torpedoes and mines, as did the Soviet navy, and China’s military also has discussed the use of nuclear torpedoes in its military writings as recently as 2006.
Report: North Korea Developing Nuclear Sea Mines | USNI Blog
If Aunty had balls she would have been an uncle
the newz is from "Quagmire" ?
the pervert of that cartoon family guy?
Don't have to believe DRDO.The tests are on video.Plus s-300 systems.Back to topic the numbers of nukes are irrelevant really.100 are enough to ruin the earth permanently with its aftereffects.
The earth will not be ruined by 100 nuclear weapons - relax.
Pakistan's first strike against India should target atleast 400 major Indian cities. This is the only way to deter chauvenistic Indian generals who are advising Indian government to call Pakistan's nuclear bluff.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)