The question still lies why kids of PakistaN don't read about non muslims kings like Ranjit Singh ??
1. history is history..whatever happened in the past must be mentioned...thats not he case with history books in pakistan...they kept the fact in mind that they were pakistanis after partition so Indian history is not worth mentioning in the books...thats where the readres are deprived of the historical facts of the land they come from...they now just know the facts of the soil hey got transfred to.
2.why only mughal emperors coming from outside of India is shown in good colours..I'll tel you why because they were working on spreading islam...see religion comes again.
on your point that some like akhbar and some not..then I think thats great..thats what i am talking about..let the readers decide themselves, who was bad and who was goood by reading about evrything and everyone from the past..the ntire story....why enforce them to read what you want them to read...by just mentioning about indianmuslim rulers and not hindu kings and rulers who were more historical than even the mughals....you read about the fist history of the land i.e harappan civilisation and then you skip the hindu kings like ashoka and mauryas and then jump to the mughal rulers..why skip those periods where the rulers were Hindus ??
I agree it was politics..but what was the politics about in that time buddy ?? in your country the politics was based on religion while the books were published...the very base of the creatin of Pakistan is religion...thats why you refused to share Indian land, indian name and ofcourse Indian history ..isnt it ?? and thatsmy point.
---------- Post added at 05:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 AM ----------
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)