this discussing is not about China and my post also was not against China but against hypocrite Pakistanis who criticise actions of the same kind by looking at the face .
even though China or saudi or Pakistan is not the topic one can connect these countries by the actions of same kind we we are discussing .
there is only one difference while France felt it is not right to declare it as a Christian state because it will negatively affect the rights and dignity of other sects of people .
on the other hand people of Pakistan and Saudi and many other nations never though of giving equal statues to all it's citizen.
in France when something goes against the spirit of it's constitution people their have the right to approach the court but in other countries people their can't do that because law of being secular is not their at the first place . so in one country they provide legal right to be treated as equal while in other countries they made the injustice , inequality to be legal ..
Last edited by Agnostic_Indian; 08-01-2012 at 10:51 PM.
Nonsense extrapolation.. There is a difference in an existing issue and and underlying principle. Absence of secularism in Pakistan and KSA is not an issue, but a Conscious decision and setup decided for the country, and the same is fully supported by most members on this forum. Religious freedom in Pakistan and KSA for non muslims comes with a million riders and that situation is the one accepted and championed by most Pakistanis (and almost all defence.pk pakistani members). After that demanding unconditional religious freedom for Muslims in non Muslim countries kind of reeks of hypocrisy to me.
This is kind of a non democratic country demanding democracy in another country..
If you go thru my original post where I absolutely stand by this. However my contention is with Paksitanis who themselves have consiously decided to not provide secular conditions in Pakistan, demanding those conditions in other countries
Your argument is void and frankly off topic. Basically you are saying since Muslim countries are intolerant they have the right to be intolerant even though they claim to be "modernized" Westerners and the champions of human society. If that is the case that is downright hypocrisy especially since they claim Muslim countries are stuck in the medieval ages in one hand and on the other do the same things they accuse us of.
If KSA does not have equal rights it is the fault of the West. They legitimized a monarchy and now need their oil for their own needs and are to scared to question the Saudis about anything.
Yes you are right it does reek of hypocrisy but the kicker is the Muslim majority nations don't go around claiming to be secular so anybody who lives there knows what they are going to get whereas the "democratic" countries claim to be secular so they should grant equal rights to everyone or stop claiming to be something they are not. If Muslims know there is no religious freedom in France for them they will stop going to France it is as simple as that.
Valid point sir.. Debate in this case makes sense if we talk about the concept of secular or non-secular state, doesn't make sense at all if we throw down the gauntlets on an individual's statement, unfortunately latter is all we are getting in the thread.
Moreover - So called deeds of a non-secular Islamic state (as per some views in here) can't be regarded as valid reasons for a secular state to execute non-secular acts.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)