RAF Eurofighter Typhoons 'beaten by Pakistani F-16s'

[krash]

Well done Pakistan, but I am sure RAF best pilots are all in Libya at the moment, then at this show.

But the rookie pilots seems poor from England.

Yeah except for the fact that this interview was already online when the Arab spring was still only a dream.

check this video.EF IN THE SIGHTS OF F-16A BUT I M NOT SURE ABT THE COUNTRY TO WHICH THAT F-16A BELONGS .THE VIDEO IS NOT IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE Aviation Video: Eurofighter Typhoon at the sight of a F-16A | Patrick's Aviation

These were dutchs Falcons.....

Iv read somewhere that these were the Danes not the Dutch.

 

[epinephrine]

^^^^
SO ITS NOT THE FIRST TIME EF IS GETTING IT BUT*S KICKED BY F-16.
I WAS READING ON F-16.NET THAT RAFALE ALSO LOST TO US F-16 N VICE VERSA IN SOME DACT EXERCISES FEW YEARS AGO.

 

[Truth Teller]

Loooveeee Pakistan

 

[manojb]

^^^^
SO ITS NOT THE FIRST TIME EF IS GETTING IT BUT*S KICKED BY F-16.
I WAS READING ON F-16.NET THAT RAFALE ALSO LOST TO US F-16 N VICE VERSA IN SOME DACT EXERCISES FEW YEARS AGO.
SO WATEVER INDIA GETS THROUGH MRCA DEAL IT CAN BE BROUGHT DOWN BY OUR FALCON BOYS COZ OF THEIR SUPERIOR TRAINING

This link says otherwise
http://www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/6-52874.aspx
Rafale beats f16 blk52: 6-2

I think u know what india is getting.

 

[epinephrine]

This link says otherwise
Rafale F2 vs F-16 Blk52 , 6-2 on the 1st day
Rafale beats f16 blk52: 6-2

I think u know what india is getting.

THE LINK U SENT MAY BE TRUE.I DON'T DENY IT.RAFALE IS A FORMIDABLE AIR CRAFT DEFINITELY BETTER THAN BLK 52 FALCONS BUT ITS NOT UNTOUCHABLE.IN GOOD HANDS BLK 52 CAN TAKE ANYTHING DOWN EXCEPT THE RAPTOR

 

[naveenp]

rafale wont be here before 2018. sit tight and wait for our FC-20 to arrive before then.

It too is a 4.5 gen fighter. the initial 36 will be here by 2014 and more will be ordered before the MMRCA arrives.

dnt forgt about MKI. it was 4.5 gen FIGHTER

 

[Jungibaaz]

dnt forgt about MKI. it was 4.5 gen FIGHTER

yh? does it have...?

AESA? No
High capacity datalink? No similar to the one on a 4+
Any stealthy features? Hell NO! it has a huge RCS.

so sorry it is a 4+ gen fighter, PAF's F-16 block 52s are closer to 4.5 gen then that.

 

[majesticpankaj]

yh? does it have...?

AESA? No
High capacity datalink? No similar to the one on a 4+
Any stealthy features? Hell NO! it has a huge RCS.

so sorry it is a 4+ gen fighter, PAF's F-16 block 52s are closer to 4.5 gen then that.

IAF has already rejected F_16 block 60 . they do not qualify on the list of 643 parameters set by IAF

 

[luckyyy]

What qualifies as an authentic link??
Since a senior journalist with a reputed magazine dedicated to world Air forces isnt working for you.. so what will?

i think you missed the word " allegedly ".

 

[Najam Khan]

i think you missed the word " allegedly ".

Hahaha....Santro 'najooomi baba' Zindabad....!

 

[Jungibaaz]

IAF has already rejected F_16 block 60 . they do not qualify on the list of 643 parameters set by IAF

So because it doesn't fit IAFs needs? you seem to think that the MKI is better then the block 60 F-16...

 

[Windjammer]

i think you missed the word " allegedly ".

Yup, any port in a storm.

 

[fatman17]

^i see the above has become a india v. pak thing!!!

anyways back to the topic..........it seems that the EFT's in question were not RAF but Italian AF EFTs but were EFT's never-the-less.

 

[SQ8]

^i see the above has become a india v. pak thing!!!

anyways back to the topic..........it seems that the EFT's in question were not RAF but Italian AF EFTs but were EFT's never-the-less.

you signature applies in this context.

 

[Donatello]

IAF has already rejected F_16 block 60 . they do not qualify on the list of 643 parameters set by IAF

And that fact that Typhoon was shot down in mock, WVR fights, that is on the 643 parameter list???? eh? Nice.