China's large passenger plane catches attention at Farnborough Air Show

[Korean]

again,can you read?

GE Capital Aviation is an aircraft leasing company that is leasing it back to Chinese airlines. GE has no intention of leasing C919 to its US customers and it is not even legally possible to do so.

As for Southeast Asian countries, I didn't see any listed.

So C919 is a 100% Chinese domestic affair.

 

[beijingwalker]

GE Capital Aviation is an aircraft leasing company that is leasing it back to Chinese airlines. GE has no intention of leasing C919 to its US customers and it is not even legally possible to do so.

As for Southeast Asian countries, I didn't see any listed.

So C919 is a 100% Chinese domestic affair.

how about South East Asian countries?are they not foreign countries?any do you work in an internatioanl aviation association?what makes you so sure about what you say?100%^lol...

 

[Ajaxpaul]

How does the chinese air safety regulation fare with US regulation ?

Are they similar ?

 

[United]

To fly over Korean airspace, a commercial jet needs a US or EU aviation authority approval.

why do u need US or EU aviation authority approval and not a korean since its flying over korea?

Is korea ruled by US or EU ? law?

why korea not capable to make planes they make good cars and washing machine?

 

[beijingwalker]

why do u need US or EU aviation authority approval and not a korean since its flying over korea?

Is korea ruled by US or EU ? law?

why korea not capable to make planes they make good cars and washing machine?

S.Korea is just a western vassal state,foreign troops station in S.Korea to protect this little boy,it's never an independent country.

 

[somebozo]

This is for China's domestic market only. No foreign airline would risk the lives of their passengers on a Chinese jet.

I wouldn't risk my life in a Korean car which forgets to brake at times.

why do u need US or EU aviation authority approval and not a korean since its flying over korea?

Is korea ruled by US or EU ? law?

why korea not capable to make planes they make good cars and washing machine?

The best washing machine is Made in USA.

http://www.speedqueen.com/

 

[Ajaxpaul]

why do u need US or EU aviation authority approval and not a korean since its flying over korea?

Is korea ruled by US or EU ? law?

why korea not capable to make planes they make good cars and washing machine?

And ships..you forgot ships...

I wouldn't risk my life in a Korean car which forgets to brake at times.

Korean cars are not bad..must be a one off problem.

 

[ChinaToday]

How does the chinese air safety regulation fare with US regulation ?

Are they similar ?

A friend of mine working for a company that does maintainance works for major airlines told me they do more checks for chinese airlines than those europe and america airlines.

 

[regular]

Okay Great work done by our Chinese brothers within the Aviation field. The Chinese aircrafts will compete within the international market. This will lower the prices of the Western commercial aircrafts as well as their supremacy........

 

[Korean]

why do u need US or EU aviation authority approval and not a korean since its flying over korea?

Because FAA and EASA approvals are the gold standards of civilian aerospace industry. No need to waste money on a separate Korean certification(Which is available, and CN-235 that Indonesia sold to Korea as offset flew with Korean certification).

A similar story is that Israel accepts Korean and Japanese cars built to US market spec without a separate Israeli testing and certification, which saves time and money for Korean and Japanese exporters. Why? US market legal cars are good enough for Israelis.

Same story elsewhere; no country other than China would take Chinese certifications, which means COMAC must get FAA and EASA certifications if they really want to export and put C919 on international flights.(Foreign airports require that the landing aircraft be certified by FAA and EASA).

why korea not capable to make planes they make good cars and washing machine?

There is not enough engineering and R&D investment resources to tackle both military and civilian aviation at the same time. All of Korea's available engineering and financial resources are committed into military aviation for now(KFX, local attack helicopter, combat drones, etc).

 

[gambit]

why do u need US or EU aviation authority approval and not a korean since its flying over korea?

Is korea ruled by US or EU ? law?

why korea not capable to make planes they make good cars and washing machine?

Because FAA and EASA approvals are the gold standards of civilian aerospace industry. No need to waste money on a separate Korean certification(Which is available, and CN-235 that Indonesia sold to Korea as offset flew with Korean certification).

A similar story is that Israel accepts Korean and Japanese cars built to US market spec without a separate Israeli testing and certification, which saves time and money for Korean and Japanese exporters. Why? US market legal cars are good enough for Israelis.

Same story elsewhere; no country other than China would take Chinese certifications, which means COMAC must get FAA and EASA certifications if they really want to export and put C919 on international flights.(Foreign airports require that the landing aircraft be certified by FAA and EASA).

What he did was nothing more than an ignorant and baseless jab at a US ally at the expense of truth and logical thinking. He is ignorant in that a 'certification' is not a 'law'. A certification is a declaration that something is good enough to do this or that based upon reasons A through Z. It has no enforcement other than through persuasion. It is up to the government to make legal enforcement based upon this certification, not the engineers who established the reasons A-Z.

If South Korea had only copied the FAA standards and called it South Korea's own it would have made no difference. He would have taken the same jab from a different direction. The irony here is that the Chinese probably did exactly just that but never made public about it.

 

[Korean]

ARJ21 Delays Threaten C919 Schedule

ARJ21 Delays Threaten C919 Schedule
By Leithen Francis, Bradley Perrett

September 12, 2011
Leithen Francis/Singapore and Bradley Perrett/Beijing

Call it a case of being let down by one's older brother: New delays in the certification of the Comac ARJ21 regional jet could force the development of the C919 mainline commercial aircraft to be prolonged.

The FAA is insisting its shadow certification effort on the ARJ21 be completed before the agency begins work on the C919. But the C919 is already near the point at which a certification agency needs to be brought in; if the project advances much further without the FAA's involvement, the U.S. regulator may decide it can never become involved.

Moreover, Comac has shifted scarce engineers to help sort out the ARJ21's problems at a time when the C919 is already running a few months late. Since FAA endorsement of the C919's Chinese certification is indispensable to the international sales prospects of the 156-seat, six-abreast aircraft, the brewing crisis again raises questions about China's decision to throw its inexperienced industry into development of a second indigenous airliner before finishing its first, the ARJ21. Indeed, the C919 was launched in May 2008, six months before the ARJ21 even flew.

 

[gambit]

I wouldn't risk my life in a Korean car which forgets to brake at times.

I have been to your part of the world. Quite often drivers there tends to forget to brake at times.

 

[alibaz]

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

reported for trolling

If one of these planes does come down, let's hope it comes down on your house. Gussing a lot of Chinese flights pass over Korean airspace so watch out, you never know.

No need to waste time with those jealous Koreans and Viets as their own country doesn't even have an independent industry.