Search results

No, APS is active kill systems purpose is to avoid projectile contact with tank armour in the first place...so round/rectangular doesnt matter; projectile isto be dealt with at a distance from tank

Some captures regarding engine alignment on helis...see they are moved upwards, to reduce heat signatures to ground based threats- IR missiles(their OFTEN enemy) This perplexes me?

you belong to the KSA your opinion about Iran is going to be rigged :rolleyes:

Iran starts production of dual-purpose carbon fiber | World | RIA Novosti

Ahh here comes a valuable addition; even today Chogy I have bookmarked the engine site address you said belong to you... However, there is something that Japanese couldn't do back in WWii & even today; & that is the manufacture of jet engines?? I mean no helicopter engines, no heavy machinery...

This is true I have said it many times. Here goes a recent research paper even: dated: 2006 https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/1047 :azn: Another thing, even if it theorically can detect the laser, from ranges from 5-10km the beam will be so diffracted that it will be not possible...

Ingenious designs are bound to have 'flaws'; Amerikan had flaws, Russian had flaws...but the ability to disuade those flaws is a quality Japanese do possess. With the miniaturised electronics that Japan produces every thing get smaller in size, reduced in weight ...& in rocket terms get more...

Beware Russian & Americans, as there comes another player in Space race…Japan is pushing its already praised technical & engineering abilities to have a slice in the shares of billion dollar space launch industry, specializing in the launch of commercial satellites. Being renowned of their...

simple calculation f= frequency in Hz c= speed of light 3E8 or 300000000 in m/s λ = wavelength in m now say for 3Ghz = 3E9 HZ c= 3E8 m/s now putting these values in parent formula you get 0.1m for λ = 10cm same applies for all other frequencies next time do calculate & tell us what...

Chogy you are really hilarious, good post

@500 As expected this definition is from the WIKI page & I always say that Russian terminologies are different ( & in many cases economically good) lets giv an example of terminology difference, to sooth away 500's feeling that KBP is trying to fool others by stating its weapon fire-forget...

Respected Santro, I do strongly believe that we must go on in technical cooperation with china as it is the ONLY politco/economico/geo feasible option however the quality of Chinese is yet to get mature & I am not talking about Defence industry in particular. Details to follow: In our...

Thnx for helping me out...you & Lidsky. Thnx again

^^Sir can you explain what do you mean by technical vision

you came late but with a bang...thread is going to be concluded with your arrival:mod:

Technical info here: DefenceDog: Kornet-EM New Capabilities of Antitank Guided Missile Systems its a class of its own

I am really missing two great intellectuals here...whom I had sought way too much guidance in unbiased historical events: Names are T-Faz & Joe Shearer...& the latter isn't active for a month or so, I request Indians to somehow contact sir Joe Shearer

well it settles this in Russian terms fire-forget never means...active seeker