Search results

i think sending subs out on patrol in international waters is routine for almost every navy..

the su-35 may not make sence in buying but the su-34 definitely does!!!! it would greatly increase our strike capability if we had some strike fighters... i kno we have the sepecat jag, but it requires an escort... and i kno we have the mki, but its strike capability is limited... we need to...

wow.. guys lets stop with the name calling and keep this forum clean.... btw, the whole discussion with the weapons falling into Taliban hands seems unlikely to me... i doubt they know how to operate them, i mean these ppl have been using ak-47s and rpg launchers, they have never been near such...

i dont know if the pakfa is going to be as good as the f-22 just yet... remember how long it took the su-27 to overtake the f-15 in superiority... the aircraft usually needs time to be perfected...

there is actually a mig program already parallel to the pakfa... the fgfa is going to be a variant of the pakfa, sort of like the mki...and mass production it expected by 2015-2017, according to sukhoi chief...

is this a real picture or on created by someone...

actual pictures of the pakfa!!!!!!!!!!!

i wonder if anyone of you has seen this picture... :usflag::pdf::sniper:

lol... where have u been... they going to do the first flight this year...

lol...no space isnt weaponised... there are no missiles up in space..

i dont think india needs to spend for the su-35, i kno it has a better airframe and better engine, but its pretty much the su-30mki... besides its only single seater, and india should just wait for the pakfa...and besides they have ordered 280 mki.. delivered by 2015, around the time the pakda...

true it sure aint no topol m lol... but i dont believe that there is going to be a weaponization of space...Outer_Space_Treaty look it up...;)

lol... there was a time when india used to deny it had nuclear weapons and that it had chemical weapons...the icmb tech is present whether you want to believe it or not... look at the pslv...btw there is no advantage of admitting you have a certain type of weapon...and india has always wanted...

lol... u dont need a surya to target china... btw the surya is unconfirmed... but there is no need denying that india doesnt have icbm tech, of doesnt have capability to develop icbms... look at the PSLV... :woot:

dude trust me there is no anti missile defence system in the world that can stop a topol-m and its mirved version...:rofl:

wow... brilliantly said... i couldnt agree more...:cheers:

apparently you dont understand the concept of mutually assured destruction....:disagree: its not about winning or losing with that missile... its more of a deterrent... it gives them the idea that we can both kill each other if we wanted..:frown:

i dont know why pakistan hasnt pursued the dassault rafale.... it makes soo much sence... it gives them a better option than the f-16... it can be used in an air superiority role... you wont have problems with tech transfer, b/c the french arent bound by ITAR regulations... soo ur going to get...

actually from what ive heard the first flight is expected by late 2009 or early 2010. "At present we are building prototypes of the fifth-generation fighter and will soon start preparation for flight-testing, which is planned for 2009," Sukhoi CEO Mikhail Pogosyan announced at the Langkawi...

i dont know if its the finback, b/c i wasnt aware the russians had exported the finback, plus russia killed the deal to export naval variant of su-27, out of concern over china copying it... i think it might be a chinese creation based on the j-11 or the su-30mkk that the already have. :undecided: