Search results

Lol hawa nikal gai? I didnt challenge you, i never do when it comes to kam-zaat. You throw it at me, now grow a pair of balls and come to takhti khel. I am lazy guy, cant chase around after lowly dogs. Dont worry i wont torture you, it will be clean death (ofcourse at the hands of a chamar)...

True but fighting against your own people is worst quality. Sikhs and gurkhas were never in the situation in which they had to fight against their own people on orders of british. But pathan, as explained by churchil, was in complicated position, he had to kill his own people while for sikhs...

@ghoul i disagree with you on tanolis, they are of Pashtun origin. They have migrated from Afghanistan. One of the proof is their submission to Ahmad shah abdali like all 60 tribes, they were represented in his rule like all pashtuns. And as pashtuns they were required to give soldiers for the...

Churchil is saying that gurkhas are 100% mercenaries, they have dash of pathan and discipline of sikh. British didnt sikh and pathan fanatics, they needed 100% mercenary

We are neighbour to jats of DI khan, there are stereotypes and jokes about them but i dont want to hurt feelings of any one. Not just jatts, marwats also joke on khattaks and wazirs alot. We also have marwat jats i.e pashto speaking jats. Tall folk but with extremely dark complexion. Few decades...

FC was constituted from Zhob militia, waziristan militia, kurram militia, khyber rifles, chitral scouts, so ofcourse they would be mostly pashtuns. Whats your point?

Ameen

You are right , tanolis, tarins, karrals, swatis, jadoons and mashwanis offered quite formidible resistance to sikhs while pashtuns of kohat, karak, lakki and DI khan simply melted away. One interesting battle occured at nara (haripur) where 8 thousands sikhs were ambushed by much smaller force...

That doesnt make any sense. Entire india is also opened for their sikh citizens and they are quite well represented in every field.

Jats also killed and looted razia sultana and her husband while they were escaping.

@ghoul click on the refrence of that "local" claim of deaths on saraghari article on wikipedia. Its misleading, its actually mentioned by british. For further discussion on sargahari, click here Pakistan - The Pathans

You need to study more. DI Khan, Tank and Lakki marwat were ruled by nawab of mankera so after his defeat these areas automatically went to sikhs. Ranjeet singh arrived with 25,000 soldiers along river kurram at lakki. Marwats sought refuge in hills along with their cattle, as they used to do it...

That is an interesting info. In WW2 there were 6000 trans indus pathan soldiers. And total number of pathans including multani, indian and cis-indus pathans, was 12000. Punjabis were 2 lakh in WW2 according to this source. The percentage of pashtuns in army with pakistan has actually improved...

By punjabis you also means sikhs?

Thats weird thing to say. Pashtuns didnt get pushed beyond khyber pass, they were there where they were before sikhs arrival. Sikhs were more interested in extracting tributes than ruling, that is what british have mentioned, that there was no presence of sikh rule beyond peshawer city. Sikhs...

I was just argueing with a pakistani from karachi on facebook. He not a kid, a middle aged man who was of opinion that pakistan should wipe out afghan race and FATA people from earth for sake of humanity and peace. I tried to make him understand that it is against and humanity and there will be...

I am very well aware of @Imran Khan's intention, i know him since long. But i agree with you though. British had to make desi sepoys drunk with praises so that they are motivated to serve them and die for them. It reminds me of saraghari incident, 21 sikh soldiers died on small fort on hilltop...

I am not a supporter of TTP but its not proved they are recieving money from America or india. Mercenaries are those who fight for the cause of other nations, just like these soldiers were fighting for the cause of queen, taliban are fighting for their own cause. If they take money from another...

@Imran Khan has not clicked the link, he just read the pathan part in title and aimed his comment at pathans. He missed the part that winston is talking about his own soldiers of british indian army, malakhand field force who were suppressing the largest uprising in the frontier against durand...

Its depends. Forexample pak army consist of the same "mercenary" races of british. Same Potohar, peshawer and kohat, as were in british times. @ghoul your comments?