What's new

China’s weapons exceed self-defence needs, says US

mujahideen

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
0
‘China’s arms exceed self-defence needs’

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

WASHINGTON: The United States said late on Monday it was “troubling” that China’s weapons systems capability exceeded the level Beijing defined as necessary for self-defence.

The head of the US armed forces in the Asia-Pacific, Admiral Timothy Keating, said he was told by Chinese leaders during a visit to Beijing that its so-called “area denial weapons” were “to protect those things that are ours.”

But he said, “We find it troubling that the capabilities of some of these weapons systems would tend to exceed our own expectations for protecting those things that are ‘ours.’” Keating said the United States had “intelligence that reinforces my opinion that China is developing, fielding and has in place weapons that could be characterised as having, amongst perhaps other purposes, an ability to restrict movement in and around certain areas on the sea, in the air or under the sea.

“I’ll go back to the point we made a couple of times already — that we understood PRC (China’s) intentions, not just their transparency, not just the fact that these weapons exist. We know they exist,” he said. “It’s why are they being fielded,” Keating asked, speaking at a Washington forum of the US-based Asia Society.

The Pentagon fears China’s area-denial arms, including missiles, can be used to attack US aircraft carriers and ships, reports have said. “The PLA (China’s People’s Liberation Army) appears engaged in a sustained effort to develop the capability to interdict, at long ranges, aircraft carrier and expeditionary strike groups that might deploy to the western Pacific,” according to the annual Pentagon report last year to the US Congress. “Increasingly, China’s area denial/anti-access forces overlap, providing multiple layers of offensive systems, utilising the sea, air, and space,” the report said. The United States fears a Chinese military build up could blunt any US intervention in a conflict over Taiwan and challenge US naval access to the Asian region.

A year ago, China used a ballistic missile to destroy a Chinese weather satellite in low Earth orbit, causing worries in Washington that Beijing could disrupt US military satellites in a regional conflict. In addition, a Chinese submarine approached a US aircraft carrier in the Pacific Ocean and surfaced within firing range of its torpedoes and missiles before being detected.

To a question by a Chinese diplomat at the forum, Keating said he did not think the two countries should set a special criteria for military transparency but sought what he called an “inter-agency approach” to facing challenges. Keating, who just returned from his second visit to China, said that they should also increase dialogue, have better communication and develop “bonds of trust and understanding” to avoid potential conflicts.

“I think we will proceed on a path that will reduce tensions and reduce the likelihood of misunderstanding leading to crisis, leading to conflict,” he said. Keating also expressed relief that a November row with Beijing over the port visits of US ships appeared to have been resolved.

An American warship USS Blue Ridge was allowed on Monday to dock in Hong Kong, in the first visit by a US vessel since the USS Kitty Hawk was denied entry in the Chinese administered territory about two months ago.

Two US minesweepers were also refused permission to shelter in Hong Kong from a brewing tropical storm. “The sense I got is that they didn’t want to be confrontational,” Keating told reporters. “I am not as concerned today as I was before ... We think we are developing a better understanding of them.”

‘China’s arms exceed self-defence needs’
 
USA should explain why they have F-22, TMD and anti-missile sheild against China, all are exceeding self-defence needs. :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

:china::pakistan:
 
That is all that can be said?

Anything substantial have you to offer than mere one liners?
 
Just because China is a "socialist republic" doesn't mean the "democratic" West can blame it for having enough weapon for self-defense since its pretty obvious US/Japan will interfere during unification of China with Taiwan. Seriously Ideological discrimination makes me sick; Northern Europe countries having highest HDI (Human Development Index) are all de facto "socialist". Law is a much better option than democracy, which China is striving toward.
 
China’s weapons exceed self-defence needs, says US

WASHINGTON: The United States said Monday it was “troubling” that China’s weapons systems capability exceeded the level Beijing defined as necessary for self-defence.

The head of the US armed forces in the Asia-Pacific, Admiral Timothy Keating, said he was told by Chinese leaders during a visit to Beijing that its so-called “area denial weapons” were “to protect those things that are ours.”

But he said, “we find it troubling that the capabilities of some of these weapons systems would tend to exceed our own expectations for protecting those things that are ‘ours.’”Keating said the United States had “intelligence that reinforces my opinion that China is developing, fielding and has in place weapons that could be characterized as having, amongst perhaps other purposes, an ability to restrict movement in and around certain areas on the sea, in the air or under the sea.

“I’ll go back to the point we made a couple of times already - that we understood PRC (China’s) intentions, not just their transparency, not just the fact that these weapons exist. We know they exist,” he said. “It’s why are they being fielded,” Keating asked, speaking at a Washington forum of the US-based Asia Society. The Pentagon fears China’s area-denial arms, including missiles, can be used to attack US aircraft carriers and ships, reports have said.

“The PLA (China’s People’s Liberation Army) appears engaged in a sustained effort to develop the capability to interdict, at long ranges, aircraft carrier and expeditionary strike groups that might deploy to the western Pacific,” according to the annual Pentagon report last year to the US Congress. “Increasingly, China’s area denial/anti-access forces overlap, providing multiple layers of offensive systems, utilizing the sea, air, and space,” the report said.

The United States fears a Chinese military buildup could blunt any US intervention in a conflict over Taiwan and challenge US naval access to the Asian region. afp

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
This is pretty funny. The US accusing another country of overspending on "defense" (should be called offense for the US) ? I don't know why Admiral Keating is trying to sound so surprised, does he expect the Chinese military to simply be happy with "just good enough" instead of "we can challange the US soon"?
 
So what now? Does china needs anyones permission before increasing her arsenal. I am amazed that the country that is accusing so is the one which herself has the largest military budjet in the world in the name of so called protecting the freedom.
 
The bottom line is U.S. spends more then any other country on Defense, but they can stand if another country is trying to beef up its defense needs. This is the internal matter of that country. In my opinion if the U.S. wants other countries to reduce their defence spending, the U.S. as a superpower must decrease its defense spending first. You can tell some to do something when you yourself is doing the opposite.
 
Peaceful re-unification or none at all. The PRC has nothing which the Taiwanese people want lest it would be fully reunited today. It's not their desire-for good reason.

Area Denial, however, goes much further than simply Taiwan or thumbing a Communist nose at America. Unilateral domination of the Taiwan Straits by PRC threatens Japan, S. Korea, and Asian Russia. It threatens America, who's a major Pacific maritime trading partner. That's four nations, three whom are major naval powers directly affected by Chinese ambitions.

It's not defensive and it's not smart. The PRC is not ready. The PRC could use these monies far more profitably developing their commercial and social infrastructure. No nation is more vulnerable to maritime strategies of interdiction and blockade. Their intentions, as Adm. Keating indicated, are well-studied, known, and very premature.

PLAN/PLAAF/PLA are firmly on our radar.
 
This is pretty funny. The US accusing another country of overspending on "defense" (should be called offense for the US) ? I don't know why Admiral Keating is trying to sound so surprised, does he expect the Chinese military to simply be happy with "just good enough" instead of "we can challange the US soon"?

Buddy you saying

"we can challange the US soon"?

do you know what it means clearly Sound of a new Packet :yahoo:
 
PLAN/PLAAF/PLA are firmly on our radar.

What about USN is cushily at every country's gate?

Was there any good reason for chasing indians,the original inhabitants of North America, off their hometown? yes, you wanted their land.

Was there any good reason for chemical bombs thrown on Vietnam's land? yes, you hated those resisters.

Was there any good reason for invasion of Iraq? Yes, you need a firm control of oil.

the one who succeeded throuth his bloody history,who holds the most powerful WMDs, who destoryed a country and then threatens the next, is now accusing others threatening.

reason for reunification across taiwan strait: one China,one nation.
 
"reason for reunification across taiwan strait: one China,one nation."

Come and get it. Peaceful re-unification or none at all.

Worry less about what you can't have. Spend less on area-denial systems. Spend more on trains so your people can enjoy their families during the holidays.

Happy new year!:agree:
 
wish me a peaceful one,coz DPP has been provoking one China policy and the status quo as catching at their last straws in political jam, and coz US is deeply in it for the status quo.

To understand a snowstorm on the global warming trend, pls also refer to 1998 ice damage and 2005 snow damage in North America. they are not necessarily about infrastructure.

happy new year.
 
KVLin,

Indeed the US is repressive.

I see that you love dabbling in history!

Should we start with the repression in Chinese history?
 
KVLin,

Indeed the US is repressive.

I see that you love dabbling in history!

Should we start with the repression in Chinese history?

chill, aren't you already addicted to repressions in Chinese history?

history is everything behind you, specially when you're felling into catathymic amnesia.

one has to know where he was from,in order to know where he's going.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom