What's new

China tops U.S. in quantity and quality of scientific papers

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,191
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

China tops U.S. in quantity and quality of scientific papers​

Report finds rapidly expanding Chinese research footprint while Japan falters

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F0%252F2%252F0%252F9%252F41729020-3-eng-GB%252FCropped-1660049667photo_SXM2022080800003209.jpg

The economic and technological rivalry between China and the U.S. only continues to grow.


RYOSUKE MATSUZOE, Nikkei staff writer
August 10, 2022 01:45 JST

TOKYO -- China now leads the world both in the number of scientific research papers as well as most cited papers, a report from Japan's science and technology ministry shows, which is expected to bolster the competitiveness of its economy and industries in the future.

Research papers are considered higher quality the more they are cited by others. Chinese research accounted for 27.2%, or 4,744, of the world's top 1% of most cited papers, overtaking the U.S. at 24.9%, or 4,330. The U.K. came in third at 5.5%.

The ministry's National Institute of Science and Technology Policy compiled the report based on data from research-analytics company Clarivate. The figures represent 2019 levels, based on the annual average between 2018 and 2020 to account for fluctuations in publication numbers. The report was released Tuesday, the same day U.S. President Joe Biden signed into law the CHIPS and Science Act, a $280 billion bill framed as essential to winning economic competition with China through greater research.

Scientific research is the driver behind competitive industries and economies. Current research capabilities will determine future market shares in artificial intelligence, quantum technology and other cutting-edge fields, and may have a direct impact on national security as well.

China has quickly increased its footprint in advanced research in recent years. It overtook the U.S. in the total number of scientific papers in the 2020 report, then in the number of top 10% most cited papers in the 2021 report.

China published 407,181 scientific papers in 2019 according to the latest report, pulling further ahead of the U.S. at 293,434. In terms of the top 10% most cited papers, China accounted for 26.6% of publications, while the U.S. accounted for 21.1%.

"China is one of the top countries in the world in terms of both the quantity and quality of scientific papers," said Shinichi Kuroki, deputy director-general of the Asia and Pacific Research Center at the Japan Science and Technology Agency.

"In order to become the true global leader, it will need to continue producing internationally recognized research," he said.

Meanwhile, Japan is falling behind. It ranked fifth in the total number of publications and 10th in the top 1% most cited papers in the latest report after losing ground to India. It dropped to 12th place in the number of the top 10% most cited papers, passed by Spain and South Korea.

The number of universities in India have increased roughly 4.6 times from 243 in 2000 to 1,117 in 2018. Over two million receive a bachelor's degree in the sciences each year. In contrast, research Japan has slowed since the mid-2000s with no recovery in sight, stoking concerns about the effect on the country's economy and industries.

 
First industrially, and economically, after that, scientifically and technologically, eventually militarily... China is not in a hurry on her way of overtaking US in all sectors across the board.
 

China overtakes the US in scientific research output​

Between 2018 and 2020 China published 23.4% of the world’s scientific papers, eclipsing the US

Thu 11 Aug 2022 06.17 BST

3500.jpg

The Japanese report also found that Chinese research comprised 27.2% of the world’s top 1% most frequently cited papers Photograph: Xinhua/Rex/Shutterstock


China has overtaken the US as the world leader in both scientific research output and “high impact” studies, according to a report published by Japan’s science and technology ministry.


The report, which was published by Japan’s National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTP) on Tuesday, found that China now publishes the highest number of scientific research papers yearly, followed by the US and Germany.

The figures were based on yearly averages between 2018 and 2020, and drawn from data compiled by the analytics firm Clarivate.

The Japanese NISTP report also found that Chinese research comprised 27.2% of the world’s top 1% most frequently cited papers. The number of citations a research paper receives is a commonly used metric in academia. The more times a study is cited in subsequent papers by other researchers, the greater its “citation impact”.

The US accounted for 24.9% of the top 1% most highly cited research studies, while UK research was third at 5.5%.

China published a yearly average of 407,181 scientific papers, pulling ahead of the US’s 293,434 journal articles and accounting for 23.4% of the world’s research output, the report found.

China accounted for a high proportion of research into materials science, chemistry, engineering and mathematics, while US researchers were more prolific in research into clinical medicine, basic life sciences and physics.

The report was published on the day US president Joe Biden signed the Chips and Science Act, legislation that would authorise $200bn in research funding over 10 years to make US scientific research more competitive with China.

The Chinese embassy in the US said last month that China was “firmly opposed” to the bill which it said was “entrenched in [a] cold war and zero-sum game mentality”.

The “high impact” finding is in keeping with research published earlier this year, which found that China overtook the US in 2019 in the top 1% measure, and passed the European Union in 2015.

Papers that receive more citations than 99% of research are “works that are seen as being in the class of Nobel prize winners, the very leading edge of science”, study co-author Dr Caroline Wagner said at the time. “The US has tended to rank China’s work as lower quality. This appears to have changed.”

The US still spends more on research and development in the corporate and university sectors than any other country, the report also found. “China has the largest number of researchers in the corporate and university sectors among major countries. In the corporate sector, the United States and China are on par with each other, and both are showing rapid growth.”

“China is one of the top countries in the world in terms of both the quantity and quality of scientific papers,” Shinichi Kuroki of the Japan Science and Technology Agency told Nikkei Asia. “In order to become the true global leader, it will need to continue producing internationally recognised research,” he said.

 

China tops US in scientific research output, high impact studies: Report​

Thu Aug 11, 2022 08:37 PM
rep_img.jpg

Representational Image: Reuters file photo/ Thomas Peter

China has surpassed the US to become the global leader in both scientific research output and "high impact" studies, according to a report published by Japan's National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTP).

China now publishes a yearly average of 407,181 scientific papers, accounting for 23.4% of the annual number of scientific research papers based on yearly averages between 2018 and 2020, compared to 293,434 journal articles by the US, said the report, published on Tuesday (August 9).

The figures were drawn from data compiled by Clarivate, an analytics firm, reports The Guardian.

The NISTP report also found that 27.2% of the world's top 1% most frequently cited research papers are from China, followed by US with 24.9% and UK with 5.5%.

The number of citations a research paper receives is a commonly used metric in academia known as "citation impact".

A high proportion of Chinese research papers accounted for materials science, chemistry, engineering and mathematics, The Guardian report read.
US researches were mostly in clinical medicine, basic life sciences and physics.

China overtook the US in 2019 in the top 1% measure of the "citation impact" finding, after it surpassed the European Union in 2015.

Dr Caroline Wagner, a co-author of the study, told The Guardian that research papers that receive more citations than 99% of research are "works that are seen as being in the class of Nobel prize winners, the very leading edge of science".

"The US has tended to rank China's work as lower quality. This appears to have changed," she added.

The US, however, still relies more on research and development in the corporate sector and universities compared to other countries, the report also revealed.

"China has the largest number of researchers in the corporate and university sectors among major countries. In the corporate sector, the United States and China are on par with each other, and both are showing rapid growth," it read.

"China is one of the top countries in the world in terms of both the quantity and quality of scientific papers," Shinichi Kuroki of the Japan Science and Technology Agency told Nikkei Asia.

"In order to become the true global leader, it will need to continue producing internationally recognised research," he added.

 

China tops U.S. in quantity and quality of scientific papers​

Report finds rapidly expanding Chinese research footprint while Japan falters

https%253A%252F%252Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%252Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%252Fimages%252F0%252F2%252F0%252F9%252F41729020-3-eng-GB%252FCropped-1660049667photo_SXM2022080800003209.jpg

The economic and technological rivalry between China and the U.S. only continues to grow.


RYOSUKE MATSUZOE, Nikkei staff writer
August 10, 2022 01:45 JST

TOKYO -- China now leads the world both in the number of scientific research papers as well as most cited papers, a report from Japan's science and technology ministry shows, which is expected to bolster the competitiveness of its economy and industries in the future.

Research papers are considered higher quality the more they are cited by others. Chinese research accounted for 27.2%, or 4,744, of the world's top 1% of most cited papers, overtaking the U.S. at 24.9%, or 4,330. The U.K. came in third at 5.5%.

The ministry's National Institute of Science and Technology Policy compiled the report based on data from research-analytics company Clarivate. The figures represent 2019 levels, based on the annual average between 2018 and 2020 to account for fluctuations in publication numbers. The report was released Tuesday, the same day U.S. President Joe Biden signed into law the CHIPS and Science Act, a $280 billion bill framed as essential to winning economic competition with China through greater research.

Scientific research is the driver behind competitive industries and economies. Current research capabilities will determine future market shares in artificial intelligence, quantum technology and other cutting-edge fields, and may have a direct impact on national security as well.

China has quickly increased its footprint in advanced research in recent years. It overtook the U.S. in the total number of scientific papers in the 2020 report, then in the number of top 10% most cited papers in the 2021 report.

China published 407,181 scientific papers in 2019 according to the latest report, pulling further ahead of the U.S. at 293,434. In terms of the top 10% most cited papers, China accounted for 26.6% of publications, while the U.S. accounted for 21.1%.

"China is one of the top countries in the world in terms of both the quantity and quality of scientific papers," said Shinichi Kuroki, deputy director-general of the Asia and Pacific Research Center at the Japan Science and Technology Agency.

"In order to become the true global leader, it will need to continue producing internationally recognized research," he said.

Meanwhile, Japan is falling behind. It ranked fifth in the total number of publications and 10th in the top 1% most cited papers in the latest report after losing ground to India. It dropped to 12th place in the number of the top 10% most cited papers, passed by Spain and South Korea.

The number of universities in India have increased roughly 4.6 times from 243 in 2000 to 1,117 in 2018. Over two million receive a bachelor's degree in the sciences each year. In contrast, research Japan has slowed since the mid-2000s with no recovery in sight, stoking concerns about the effect on the country's economy and industries.

Thanks to Allah, there is China. Otherwise this world would be ruined by USA.

If China allows dual nationality with Pakistan, I wouldn't mind dual nationality with China.

A Red passport or Chinese passport.
 

The Number of AI Research Publications is Accelerating Faster in China than the U.S.​

Oct 4 2022

An extremely important input to transformative artificial intelligence timelines is research activity. In order to prioritize interventions, AI strategists need an idea of how quickly the AI research effort is accelerating. It is especially important to understand differential research growth rates between major actors.

One particularly decision-relevant differential is the relative amount of AI-related research activity occurring in the US versus China. These two countries drive the bulk of AI progress, so from a governance standpoint it’s quite salient which is more likely to achieve AI dominance over the next few decades. For example, if the AI safety community makes progress in the US landscape, but most research is happening (in a risky way) in China, then global risk will remain high.

Forecasters remain highly uncertain about the relative growth of AI in the US versus China. While the US leads China in private investment and new startups founded, China leads the US significantly in the number of AI-related publications per year.

To investigate this latter trend, I gathered data from CSET’s AI Country Activity Tracker (CAT). CSET’s corpus “combines (and deduplicates) scholarship from six datasets — arXiv, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Digital Science, Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG), Papers With Code, and Web of Science,” all sourced from Dimensions. More about this corpus, including how AI-relevant papers were identified, is available here; for our purposes it represents a good (if imperfect) proxy for total AI publications.

The following plot presents the total number of AI publications for each country during the 11-year period from 2010–2020, and extrapolates this trend to 2030 using a quadratic regression model. 90% confidence intervals are also depicted.

1*6tNhfAupqAz-UnQKEvKZRw.png


China has been publishing significantly more AI-related papers than the US since 2010. This probably doesn’t indicate more actual AI research productivity in China since 2010, since the most major advances during that time occurred in the US.

The noteworthy trend, however, is that AI-related publication is accelerating faster in China than in the US, which could indicate that China is pulling ahead in underlying research activity, despite lower levels of private investment. Presumably, this would eventually translate to China outstripping the US in actual research productivity, and Chinese actors developing the most powerful models in the world.

AI timeline forecasters should monitor not only metrics which measure bottom-line ML performance and complexity, but also the factors that drive research progress. This is especially true for longer-range forecasts. In addition, a range of metrics should be considered, since — as in the case of private investment vs. paper publication — different metrics can tell different stories. It would be worthwhile to forecast more comprehensively which research communities strategists should expect to pull ahead.

It’s also worth mentioning that in order for this kind of analysis to be decision-relevant, strategists also need to model the relationship between research activity and advances in the field, for example between research publication rates and actual performance advances.

Overall, however, the story is that lower amounts of private AI investment in China and fewer new companies being founded does not necessarily suggest less R&D growth. To the contrary, the trend above suggests a tentative update towards increasing levels of Chinese AI dominance over the next decade.

 

China: decades of support for innovation is now delivering results

October 4, 2022

The evolution of China’s clean energy sector used to be based on a technology catch-up approach, which meant secondary innovation based on imported technologies. Daisy Chi at ECECP looks at the IEA’s recent report, “Tracking Clean Energy Innovation: Focus on China”, to conclude that the nation is now a major force in clean energy innovation. Decades of innovation-focussed policies, strong funding support, institutional reforms, big targets and big home markets are now bearing fruit. Performance breakthroughs in solar PV and EV batteries are at the forefront. International patents are on the rise. China is now second only to the USA for spending on energy research and development (R&D). Though much of that money is spent on fossil fuel R&D, there is a growing focus on cleaner solutions. The IEA notes that international collaboration has been at the core of China’s innovation strategy, learning through joint ventures, investing abroad, or acquiring overseas firms. As Chi reminds us, innovation matters: as many projections point out, half of the emissions savings needed globally must come from technologies that are currently at the demonstration or prototype stage.

Within just a few short years, clean energy technologies in China have moved from the margins to take up centre stage in the nation’s carbon neutrality vision. Thanks to policies increasingly focused on technology innovation, strong support for funding and resources and institutional reforms, China has evolved into a global energy innovator. The IEA’s recent report – Tracking Clean Energy Innovation: Focus on China – offers a detailed survey of China’s clean energy innovation developments. This article presents some of the key points raised at the launch event in China, co-hosted in September by ECECP and the IEA.

Over the past few decades, China has attached great importance to the development of clean energy as a key lever to boost productivity and bring about sustainable development. By the end of June 2022, renewable energy installed generation capacity had reached 1.1 TW in China, accounting for 45% of the capacity mix. China’s grid-connected wind and solar capacity has rocketed 90-fold between 2012-21, and it now represents the leading market for wind and solar[1]. Despite the impact of Covid-19, the development of renewables has shown strong resilience: newly installed generation capacity maintained double digit growth in the first half of 2022, accounting for more than 80% of overall new capacity.

The rapid growth of China’s clean energy development has been supported by its huge production capacity. Within two decades, China has become the leading manufacturer of renewable power equipment. According to Fang Xiaosong, Director of International Affairs Department of Electric Power Planning and Engineering Institute (EPPEI), Chinese companies supply about 70% of PV and 50% of wind equipment globally, making China a key player in the world’s energy transition.

From ‘Made in China’ to ‘Created in China’

China is widely recognised as the ‘World’s Factory’. While ‘Made in China’ used to be a synonym for cheap products, this stereotypical image has undergone radical change, thanks to the country’s focus on technological development and backing for home-grown technology innovation. From solar PV and EV batteries to third generation nuclear reactors and the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) nuclear fusion reactor, Chinese clean innovations are revolutionising the energy markets.

Behind this transformation lies China’s improving innovative capacity, which can be partially explained by the emphasis on patenting and research output over the past few decades. The IEA report ‘Tracking Clean Energy Innovation: Focus on China[2] shows that the number of patents relating to energy in China has increased nearly 40-fold between 2000 and 2020.

Quality has also improved. There has been a boom in international patents since the start of the decade, led in particular by strategic technologies such as batteries, solar PV and EV. China’s share of international patenting is now ahead of the US and Europe, and equal with Japan. This reflects a strengthened global presence in energy innovation and a growing awareness of the need to protect homegrown innovation.

word-image-44058-1.png

Source: Tracking Clean Energy Innovation: Focus on China, IEA.

Academic and research output

Another sign that China’s clean energy innovation has become fully developed is its academic and research output. The innovation output of China’s research institutions and universities, especially in the fields of natural sciences and new energy technology, ranks among the top in the world. A recent energy-specific bibliometric research report jointly published by Chinese Academy of Sciences and Springer Nature[3] shows that China accounted for more than 25% of global publications between 2015 and 2019 in fields such as solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, nuclear, hydrogen, energy storage and energy internet. The statistic is evidence of China’s burgeoning bank of knowledge relating to clean tech.

The vitality of China’s innovation in clean energy did not develop overnight: it is the result of decades of policy support built on robust institutional foundations, more resource investment in technology R&D, strong marketing pull levers, and most importantly close cooperation with global partners.

The creation of a solid institutional foundation for innovation began decades ago

Over recent years, the Chinese government has attached great importance to the development of clean energy, and has provided solid legal foundations to support energy innovation. Gao Hu, Director General of Energy Economics and Development Strategy Centre at NDRC Energy Research Institute, notes that since China’s Renewable Law came into force in 2006, development of its renewable energy industry has been guided by its Mid- and Long-term Plan for Renewable Energy. This long-term vision has been implemented by means of successive Five-Year Plans (FYPs), along with associated action plans and guidelines.

These FYPs and affiliated policy documents not only set clear priorities and timescales for China’s energy innovation, catering for the realities of industry development, but also map out favourable industrial policies that support the flourishing of clean technologies and industries. They provide clear directions for innovation activities and reassurance for investors from the business sector.

word-image-44058-2.png

Source: Tracking Clean Energy Innovation: Focus on China, IEA.
In the 14th FYP period (2021-25), the key policy documents released so far, including 14th FYP for Energy Technology Innovation[4] and the newly introduced sci-tech implementation plan supporting the carbon targets[5], show an increasing focus on clean energy innovation as a means of meeting China’s dual carbon targets. While the technology innovation plan directly focuses on detailed measures to promote innovation of the energy sector, the sci-tech plan features ten specific actions across different sectors to promote technological breakthroughs and innovation in low-carbon transition.

Together, these documents are facilitating the strong momentum behind clean innovation. According to Jean-Baptiste Le Marois, Energy Technology and Innovation Analyst at IEA, these overarching plans, coupled with China’s coordinated decision-making process, allow the country to ‘quickly align efforts from different actors, public, private and academia for example, so that everyone works towards national priorities, and this is a key strength in China’.

word-image-44058-3.png


Substantial flows of resource into innovation

The process of bringing an innovative clean-tech from the research lab to the mass market can be a long one, and favourable policy framework alone cannot guarantee its success. Strong support from public and private funding, and R&D input, are vital as a new technology matures.

It has been shown that government R&D spending in a given field or industry, especially when sustained over long periods, correlates with future innovation in related fields[6]. According to IEA and Mission Innovation statistics[7], China is now second only to the USA for spending on energy research and development (R&D).

Further energy R&D funding growth is now likely: during the 14th FYP it is set to grow 7% annually. In 2020, China invested USD 8.4 billion of public funds into energy innovation, and of this, the share taken by low-carbon budgets has risen to almost 50%. Although the country does still allocate substantial funds to R&D in fossil-fuel related technologies, the focus is now clearly on cleaner, efficient and flexible use of fossil fuels, in line with the national target of carbon neutrality.

Private investment is supplementing the huge sums of public money. IEA estimates of R&D spending by globally listed companies suggest that Chinese companies–state-owned, private or with mixed ownership–spend more on energy R&D than in any other country[8]. In recent years, China has become a clean energy venture capital powerhouse, notably led by electric transport start-ups. These start-ups have reaped the benefits of support from government, state-owned enterprises and universities, with the latter injecting abundant well-educated R&D talent into the sector. These success stories open significant opportunities to position the country in global supply chains for EVs, and could provide a template for other low-carbon energy technologies[9].

Strong “marketing pull levers” for innovation

China’s unique market and economic characteristics have enabled the development of effective marketing pull levers to promote innovation. The IEA research demonstrates that China’s huge domestic market size, top-down implementation approach, export-oriented manufacturing, availability of cheap capital for industry development, and comprehensive industry-wide strategies all constitute incentives for innovators to keep developing new, better and cheaper technologies, and trigger feedback loops from users back to innovators[10].

As clean energy technologies are often costly and technically difficult at the initial stage, a lot of investment and breakthroughs are needed at this point. According to Gao Hu, China attaches great importance to clean energy demonstration projects as a key means of creating a domestic market in a project’s early stages. Various demonstration initiatives, such as ‘Golden Sun’ in distributed solar and ‘10 City 1000 NEV’ for deploying new energy vehicles, have opened up significant business opportunities that have enabled these technologies to develop rapidly at larger scale.

In addition, local governments in China are highly involved in the creation of a clean energy market. They have been taking integrated measures based on local conditions to implement national low-carbon strategies. This means that innovative clean technologies can be tested in diverse situations, which has made a significant contribution to the overall maturing and industrialisation of these technologies.

Where market creation interventions alone have not been enough to stimulate innovation, China has also established comprehensive industry-wide strategies to promote the rapid development of clean energy-related manufacturing industries, which help to bring down overall production costs further, and to encourage subsequent technology improvements.

International cooperation at the core

China’s approach to clean energy used to be based on a technology catch-up approach, which would see secondary innovation based on imported technologies. However, with the growing R&D support for innovation, this situation has changed. Today, China has proactive and close collaborations with international innovators.

As observed by the IEA, international collaboration has been at the core of China’s innovation strategy in the past decades, by learning through joint ventures, investing abroad, or acquiring overseas firms. By collaborating with international partners, China’s domestic innovation capabilities have seen steady improvement.

A classic case in point is the solar PV industry in China. China has successfully moved from being a technology importer to a global innovator. The start of its innovation journey was its development work with foreign universities and this was followed by joint ventures and domestic corporate partnerships, which further helped to achieve economies of scale and cost-based competition for export markets. China has now evolved into the global centre of PV innovation systems, with Chinese manufacturers regularly breaking the conversion efficiency records and making an increasingly important contribution to global patenting.

word-image-44058-4.png

Source: Tracking Clean Energy Innovation: Focus on China, IEA.
In recent years, China has proactively engaged in global innovation networks such as IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes, Mission Innovation and the Clean Energy Ministerial. According to Fang Xiaosong, China has established cooperative relationships with more than 30 international organisations and is working with over 100 countries and regions on clean energy projects.

Despite the strong engagement in international energy innovation partnerships, IEA research has found fewer collaborations between Chinese researchers and international peers in terms of filing for co-patented inventions or co-publishing scientific papers[11]. It is clear that more effort will be needed to deepen cooperation on innovation.

Much hope rests on accelerating clean energy innovation

Clean energy innovation is key to delivering the rapid transition needed to meet global climate targets, against a backdrop of rising policy ambitions and a changing technology landscape. Looking forward, about half of the emissions savings necessary will come from technologies that are currently at demonstration or prototype stage[12]. In addition, many of the clean energy technologies that are available today, such as offshore wind, new energy vehicles, green hydrogen and certain applications of CCUS, will need an innovative boost to bring down costs and accelerate deployment.

China’s improving ability to innovate in low-carbon energy technologies is having an important impact on the course of the global energy transition. The country has grown into a global manufacturing powerhouse in several key technology sectors, including solar PV, wind turbines and electric vehicles. These Chinese stories of clean energy innovation illustrate some of the key evolving features of China’s innovation ecosystem, which offer hope to global innovation efforts. They prove that faster innovation can be achieved where policy support is aligned, when targeted resources come from public and private sectors, and with enhanced international cooperation.

In the future, clean energy innovation will continue to play a crucial role in meeting China’s climate objectives and especially in some hard-to-abate sectors such as heavy industry and long distance transport. Here, there is a limited array of available decarbonisation tools, and many more breakthrough innovations are still needed.

 
1*6tNhfAupqAz-UnQKEvKZRw.png


China has been publishing significantly more AI-related papers than the US since 2010. This probably doesn’t indicate more actual AI research productivity in China since 2010, since the most major advances during that time occurred in the US.

The noteworthy trend, however, is that AI-related publication is accelerating faster in China than in the US, which could indicate that China is pulling ahead in underlying research activity, despite lower levels of private investment. Presumably, this would eventually translate to China outstripping the US in actual research productivity, and Chinese actors developing the most powerful models in the world.
After seeing this news I begin to think about future of AI translation capabilities.

https://www.techtimes.com/articles/281331/20221001/google-disables-google-translate-china-why.htm

Will we see new generation of AI which is capable of translating even poems and text as much as it's possible close to what it is in native language ?
 
Last edited:
Will we see new generation of AI which is capable of translating even poems and text as much as it's possible close to what it is in native language ?

Translating is simple...interpreting poems is indeed harder...but Google is working on it.


Here you can see examples of people stating simple sentences and Google Imagen interpreting the sentence via a short video explanation.
 
Last edited:

China Outpacing U.S. in Key Science Metrics​

3/11/2022
By Yasmin Tadjdeh

China is pulling ahead of the United States when it comes to key indicators of science and engineering prowess, the National Science Board is warning.

“S&E investments and capabilities are growing globally and, in some cases, the growth in other countries has outpaced that of the U.S.,” said Ellen Ochoa, chair of the board. The nation is falling behind China in important areas such as growth in research-and-development investment, the manufacturing of critical emerging technologies and patents for innovative systems, according to the National Science Board’s

“State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022” report.

“The United States’ role as the world’s foremost performer of R&D is changing as Asia continues to increase its investments,” the study said.

“Growth in R&D and S&T output by other countries, including China, outpaced that of the United States. Consequently, even as U.S. R&D has increased, the U.S. share of global R&D has declined, and the relative position of the United States in some S&T activities has either not changed or decreased even as absolute activities increased.”

Technologies such as artificial intelligence, quantum information science, microelectronics, biotechnology, robotics and space systems have been highlighted by Congress and the White House as some of the nation’s top R&D priorities, Ochoa noted.

China contributed 29 percent of the growth in global research and development between 2000 and 2019, compared to the United States’ 23 percent, according to the report.

Beijing is also leading the United States in knowledge- and technology-intensive, or KTI, industry manufacturing, although the United States is the largest producer of KTI services, Ochoa said during a press conference with reporters in January. KTI is defined as industries that globally have high rates of R&D.

Such industries “develop and deploy many of the critical and emerging technologies essential for current and future competitiveness,” she said.

There has been tremendous growth in KTI industry manufacturing in China, said Julia Phillips, chair of the National Science Board’s Science and Engineering Policy Committee.

“It is an area of concern,” she told National Defense. In terms of national security, it is problematic if the manufacturing of certain critical technologies is concentrated in an adversarial country.

For example, the Pentagon has for years been sounding the alarm about the vulnerability of semiconductors. Microelectronics are foundational to the high-tech computers, cell phones and weapon systems the United States relies on. However, while the nation is a leader in the design of semiconductors, the manufacturing and production of them has moved offshore and is now concentrated in places such as China.

Meanwhile, Beijing has also increased its patenting activities, the report noted. The U.S. share of international patents declined from 15 percent to 10 percent between 2010 and 2020. China, meanwhile, increased its share from 16 percent to 49 percent in that same timeframe.

Those are concerning statistics, Phillips said. In many cases, “innovations are embodied in patents, so that indicates a high level of creativity and innovation that is going on in China.”

Another area to watch is the number of STEM students Beijing is matriculating. China is one of the world’s leaders in awarding science and engineering first-university degrees, which are roughly equivalent to bachelor’s degrees, according to the report.

The United States is currently leading in the number of S&E doctorates awarded, with 41,000 in 2018, but Beijing is “closing the gap,” the study said. However, China has surpassed Washington in awarding the most doctorate degrees in natural sciences and in engineering, it added.

To compete with other nations, the United States must continue to attract and welcome foreign talent, Ochoa said.

“The U.S. has long been the premier developer of global STEM talent,” she said. “But the decline in the number of international students coming to the U.S. in recent years is a cause for concern.”

The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the decline of international higher education enrollment worldwide in 2020, and the number of international S&E students enrolled at U.S. institutions declined by about 20 percent, according to the report.

“International enrollment and attracting the best and the brightest from around the world is a great asset to the U.S., and we cannot afford to lose ground,” Ochoa said.

“Once the pandemic abates, it is not a foregone conclusion that international students will continue to come to the U.S. at the same rate as before, as other nations increasingly offer attractive options, and many students now have excellent educational and career opportunities in their home countries,” she added.

To remain a magnet for overseas talent, the United States must have a clear, consistent and predictable visa system and ensure that those who come to study in the country feel both welcome and secure, she said.

Meanwhile, Phillips noted that Chinese universities are increasingly becoming a preeminent source of research and development. That could affect the decision making of some students who otherwise would study in the United States.

“China — which is our largest source of foreign talent in the graduate schools — has outstanding opportunities for many of its own students to stay right at home and have a great education and a great career,” she said. The United States must “continue to be attractive for the best and brightest, wherever they come from, to come to this country and contribute their S&E talent to our own pool.”

 

China outnumbers the U.S. for the first time in this ranking of the world’s ‘best’ universities​

Last Updated: Oct. 25, 2022 at 7:43 p.m. ETFirst Published: Oct. 25, 2022 at 4:16 p.m. ET

Artificial intelligence is among the few fields that both the U.S. and China regard as a strategic national priority​


im-651292


Some 338 Chinese universities made the U.S. News & World Report’s ‘Best Global Universities Rankings,’ compared to 280 American universities.​

MARKETWATCH PHOTO ILLUSTRATION/ISTOCKPHOTO

China has surpassed the U.S. on a major ranking of the world’s best universities.

Among the 2,000 schools from more than 90 countries ranked by U.S. News & World Report, 338 Chinese universities made the list, compared to 280 American universities. It’s the first time China outnumbered the U.S.

Results were reported in the media outlet’s “Best Global Universities Rankings” released Tuesday. The U.S. and China were followed by Japan (105 universities), the United Kingdom (92), and India (81).
The media outlet began its ranking in 2014 as more universities began competing for students, as well as faculty and research investments. The rankings are based on a range of parameters, including research reputation, publications, conferences and citations. Student outcomes and individual programs are not included.

Although China surpassed the U.S. by 58 spots, the majority of U.S. universities appear in the top half of the rankings, including 8 of the top 10, the report noted.
Here is the overall top 10 list:
  1. Harvard University (U.S.)
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (U.S.)
  3. Stanford University (U.S.)
  4. University of California–Berkeley (U.S.)
  5. University of Oxford (U.K.)
  6. University of Washington–Seattle (U.S.)
  7. Columbia University (U.S.)
  8. University of Cambridge (U.K.)
  9. California Institute of Technology (U.S.)
  10. Johns Hopkins University (U.S.)
The report added four new subjects to its 43 rankings: artificial intelligence; education and educational research; meteorology and atmospheric sciences; and water resources. “They’re hot fields right now and there is a lot of interest at different levels,” Robert Morse, chief data strategist at U.S. News, told MarketWatch in an email.

Among the top 10 schools for A.I., five schools were from mainland China; the U.S.’s Carnegie Mellon also ranked high.
While public-health concerns and travel restrictions related to the pandemic partly led to the dramatic fall in numbers over the past two years, increasing tensions between the two countries have also pushed Chinese students to gradually look for alternatives, both in China and non-U.S. options.

International student enrollment at U.S. colleges and universities peaked in the 2015-2016 academic year and has been falling since then, the Institute of International Education said, citing visa concerns, competition from other countries with better access to work visas, and stronger social and political ties between China and other nations.

Here are the top 10 universities in Asia:
  1. Tsinghua University (China)
  2. National University of Singapore (Singapore)
  3. Nanyang Technological University (Singapore)
  4. Peking University (China)
  5. Chinese University of Hong Kong (China)
  6. University of Hong Kong (China)
  7. King Abdulaziz University (Saudi Arabia)
  8. University of Tokyo (Japan)
  9. Shanghai Jiao Tong University (China)
  10. Zhejiang University (China)
Artificial intelligence is among the few fields that both the U.S. and China regard as strategic national priorities. The Biden administration signed the National AI Initiative Act of 2020 into law in 2021, aiming to advance U.S. leadership in the field.

“The world’s leading powers are racing to develop and deploy new technologies like artificial intelligence and quantum computing that could shape everything about our lives — from where we get energy NG00, 1.44%, to how we do our jobs, to how wars are fought,” Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken said last year.

“We want America to maintain our scientific and technological edge, because it’s critical to us thriving in the 21st century economy,” Blinken said in a speech at a technology summit last year.

Among the top 10 schools for A.I., five schools were from mainland China, including Tsinghua University, which ranked No. 1. Carnegie Mellon University is the best U.S. college for A.I. research, ranking No. 12 on the list. China also leads in other science subjects, including nanoscience, nanotechnology, polymer science, engineering and physical chemistry.

Fewer Chinese students have attended college in the U.S. since the coronavirus pandemic. From January to September 2022, 52,034 Chinese nationals received F-1 visas, down from 95,518 for the same period in 2019, according to the U.S. State Department data. The F-1 visa is used by international students to gain a degree or an academic certificate in the U.S.

 
yes but how many are published in reputable journals?

quantity is not the key here as Russian army has found out recently
 
All these papers were stolen from US - I saw the Chinese stealing from an Amreekans briefcase.
 
Back
Top Bottom