What's new

Govt doesn’t want conflict with judiciary, vows firm response if limits crossed: Kh Asif

FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 26, 2018
Messages
18,063
Reaction score
12
Country
United Kingdom
Location
United Kingdom
Says rather than maintaining distancing, the CJP intervened and stopped commission from working
30210454e1d11e4.png

Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said on Tuesday that the government doesn’t want conflict with the judiciary, however, he made it clear that the judiciary cannot dictate the government and if it oversteps its jurisdiction and encroaches upon the domain of the Parliament, a firm and decisive response should be given.

Speaking on the floor of the Lower House of the Parliament, he said that the Inquiry Commission on Audio Leaks did not include the Chief Justice because it included the audio of his mother-in-law, adding that He raised concerns about the inclusion of an audio recording that brought about a sense of satisfaction. Contrary to expectations of maintaining distance, the Chief Justice personally intervened and halted the commission’s activities but he, rather than distancing, personally intervened and halted the functioning of the commission.

He was referring to a five-member bench order of the apex court, headed by the chief justice, which stayed the proceedings on various petitions challenging the constitution of the judicial commission formed by the Federal government, tasked to inquire about the veracity of audio leaks allegedly involving the SC judge and a relative of the top judge.


The minister recalled that former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry’s son was involved in a legal battle with Real Estate Tycoon Malik Riaz. He said the former chief justice recused himself from the case due to the conflict of interest. The minister regretted that such norms and precedents had been “abandoned by few judges of the apex court”.

“If the former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry can recuse himself then why can’t the incumbent chief justice follow the same precedent to stop influencing the justice (proceedings)in audio leaks case,” he viewed.

He reiterated the government had only intended by constituting the judicial commission, which included the members of the judiciary, to ensure transparency in court’s proceedings.

He regretted that the Apex Court Chief Justice scuttled the senior judge of the Supreme Court and the chief justice of the Balochistan High Court from the Commission. “We had not appointed members of the Parliament or someone outside the judiciary in the commission to probe audio leaks,” the minister added.

The CJP had rejected that commission because his mother-in-law’s audio call was also under the probe, he alleged. “We expected that the chief justice would keep himself out of this(matter) to ensure justice.” The minister underlined that an impression was being given that the audio calls were recorded via the bugging of telephones or devices.

“One can hack phone devices while sitting in the UK or abroad. There is no listening device required for it. International hackers are doing this. Many superpowers like the US had faced breaches of information by the hacking of international hackers,” he maintained, meanwhile, dismissing the impression that the alleged audio leaks were taped indigenously.

A committee was formed( by the NA Speaker Raja Pervaiz Ashraf) on the alleged audio leak of the former chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar’s son, he said. “Saqib Nisar’s son was found dealing with the distribution of PTI tickets for the elections of Punjab Assembly that were not held on May 14,” he alleged. The minister apprised the house that MNA Aslam Bhootani was the chair of that committee.
 

Back
Top Bottom