What's new

Indian Civilization, its contribution to Modern day Science and Philosopy

....Neutral sources, i dont read RSS mandir books. Pakistani madrassas dont even care about any hindu history but you being retarded may not know that.

Saying Rig Vedic people were hindus is like Muslims say that Moses, Jesus etc were muslims and following Islam. So are you talking about historical facts or RSS hindu facts? If you simply believe that Rig Vedic were hindus for religious reasons then no problem.

What a delusional fool, when you're 'caught with your pants down' you deliberately trying to ignore and twist facts.....
The person called Tarek Fatah in that video posted above, who is saying that Pakistan never existed and all Pakistanis were Hindus, is a Pakistani himself and he is graduated from University of Karachi in Pakistan, so your 'RSS Hindu book' theory goes out of the window......unless ofcourse you think, Pakistani institutions also teach 'RSS Hindu books'.....:lol:
Delusion of grandeur has no cure.....
 
Just like Torah is one of 4 books in Islam.

Low caste Hindus having ANI is understantable and explained by ANI waves (which include anyone who is not pure ASI South Indian). ANI doesnt simply mean aryans. And Low caste have very low amount of ANI in them. Even higher caste Indians have low ANI because of mixing but still higher ANI then low castes.

Nowhere in Vedas it is written that Arya was a race. Moreover, you jholachaap expert knowledge on Hinduism is not needed. Hinduism's foundations are on Vedas and the trimurty.

Pre-Islamic Arabs were not following Judaism. Muslims divided themselves into number of sects and schools with few centuries after the foundation of Islam like Shia, Sunni, Ismaili, Salafi, Barelvi, Dawoodi Bohra, Deobandi etc. but all are Muslims because of the same beliefs in Quran and the last Prophet of the God.
 
What a delusional fool, when you're 'caught with your pants down' you deliberately trying to ignore and twist facts.....
The person called Tarek Fatah in that video posted above, who is saying that Pakistan never existed and all Pakistanis were Hindus, is a Pakistani himself and he is graduated from University of Karachi in Pakistan, so your 'RSS Hindu book' theory goes out of the window......unless ofcourse you think, Pakistani institutions also teach 'RSS Hindu books'.....:lol:
Delusion of grandeur has no cure.....

Yes Pakistan never existed or Pakistanis for that matter, only bharti dravidians existed and pooped out of India millions of years ago.
 
Nowhere in Vedas it is written that Arya was a race. Moreover, you jholachaap expert knowledge on Hinduism is not needed. Hinduism's foundations are on Vedas and the trimurty.

Pre-Islamic Arabs were not following Judaism. Muslims divided themselves into number of sects and schools with few centuries after the foundation of Islam like Shia, Sunni, Ismaili, Salafi, Barelvi, Dawoodi Bohra, Deobandi etc. but all are Muslims because of the same beliefs in Quran and the last Prophet of the God.

Read history, many arabs were christians & jews before converting to Islam. Rig Vedic aryans people existed, it doesnt matter if they called Aryan as race. The point is they existed and moved to India to enslave Dravidans. Funny thing is North Indians are also basically dravidians but with little more ANI.
 
Yes Pakistan never existed or Pakistanis for that matter, only bharti dravidians existed and pooped out of India millions of years ago.

Finally you realized the truth....'Pakistan never existed or Pakistanis for that matter'!......the creation of modern day Pakistan was on very shaky grounds.....you have no identity.....you're living on borrowed time......
Therefore it is prudent to accept who you are(faceless individuals) and not aggravate the situation by trying to create false identities.......'cause identities cannot simply be built overnight.......
 
Read history, many arabs were christians & jews before converting to Islam.

There were some Jewish tribes in Arabia but most of the Arabs were idol worshipers neither following Judaism nor Christianity.


Rig Vedic aryans people existed, it doesnt matter if they called Aryan as race. The point is they existed and moved to India to enslave Dravidans. Funny thing is North Indians are also basically dravidians but with little more ANI.

Your extreme Hinduphobia isn't letting your mind to discard Aryan-Dravidian divide even after genetic studies. :cheesy:
 
Finally you realized the truth....'Pakistan never existed or Pakistanis for that matter'!......the creation of modern day Pakistan was on very shaky grounds.....you have no identity.....you're living on borrowed time......
Therefore it is prudent to accept who you are(faceless individuals) and not aggravate the situation by trying to create false identities.......'cause identities cannot simply be built overnight.......

Our identity is in our blood. We dont need to claim it or anything unlike aryan wannabe Dravidians of India.

There were some Jewish tribes in Arabia but most of the Arabs were idol worshipers neither following Judaism nor Christianity.




Your extreme Hinduphobia isn't letting your mind to discard Aryan-Dravidian divide even after genetic studies. :cheesy:

Aryan-Dravidian divide? Especially Indian so called Indo-Aryan speakers who are basically Dravidians but speak different languages. Of course there is no divide there, the only divide is between Pakistanis and 99% of Indians who are dravidian, autroloid hybrids.
 
Aryan-Dravidian divide? Especially Indian so called Indo-Aryan speakers who are basically Dravidians but speak different languages. Of course there is no divide there, the only divide is between Pakistanis and 99% of Indians who are dravidian, autroloid hybrids.

Your so called snowwhite theory. :omghaha::omghaha:
 
Our identity is in our blood. We dont need to claim it or anything unlike aryan wannabe Dravidians of India....

Resorting to plain lies is an indication of a humiliating defeat....

If anyone reads from the first page of this thread to the last page so far....nowhere will he/she find that Indians are wanting to be Aryans....we are in-fact discarding the 'Aryan race' theory altogether......while you guys are trying to cling on to the mythical 'Aryan race' to create you own fake identity....you're wannabe Aryans but want to turn the table now after facing humiliating defeat....what a loser.....:girl_wacko:

You came here to 'teach' us history, but if any of your history 'student' sees this thread, he/she will find what a loser you're....
 
Our identity is in our blood. We dont need to claim it or anything unlike aryan wannabe Dravidians of India.....

Yes your identity is in your blood....and your blood is IMPURE you Mulatto!

Aryan-Dravidian divide? Especially Indian so called Indo-Aryan speakers who are basically Dravidians but speak different languages. Of course there is no divide there, the only divide is between Pakistanis and 99% of Indians who are dravidian, autroloid hybrids.

Ha Ha......a Hybrid, Mulatto calling others hybrid.......what a loser.....:omghaha:
You seem to have reached the limit of your Madrassa 'education'.......so you're unable to come up with your own logical arguments anymore, you're just trying to use our own logic against us......we first called you Hybrids and proved it....NOW you're calling us hybrids just for the sake of it......you're the biggest loser I've seen on PDF so far.......:lol:
 
Aryan-Dravidian divide? Especially Indian so called Indo-Aryan speakers who are basically Dravidians but speak different languages. Of course there is no divide there, the only divide is between Pakistanis and 99% of Indians who are dravidian, autroloid hybrids.

Dimwits like you dont even know that dravidian is a linguistic group and not a race . They are present in south India , Sri Lanka and pakistan. And Arya means a noble person so even central africans can be aryans .

the only divide is between Pakistanis and 99% of Indians who are dravidian, autroloid hybrids.

Almost 5-6 % of Indians are mongoloids . So I don't understand how 99 % of Indians are Australod . Oh I forgot mathematics is not taught in madarssas . Maybe you haven't seen photos of pakistani flood victims .There are thousands of them on the web and I couldn't see a single fair shade ANI in any of them . There is a reason why pashtuns call you kaale daalkhor .
 
Dimwits like you dont even know that dravidian is a linguistic group and not a race . They are present in south India , Sri Lanka and pakistan. And Arya means a noble person so even central africans can be aryans .



Almost 5-6 % of Indians are mongoloids . So I don't understand how 99 % of Indians are Australod . Oh I forgot mathematics is not taught in madarssas . Maybe you haven't seen photos of pakistani flood victims .There are thousands of them on the web and I couldn't see a single fair shade ANI in any of them . There is a reason why pashtuns call you kaale daalkhor .

Again looking at skin tone instead of facial features which shows your inferiority complex. There are dark pashtuns as well but they will stand out from Bhartis. Anthropology and genetic tests especially shows there is clear difference. I know Dravidian in linguistic group, that's why there is no difference between north Indians and south Indians. There is no Aryan-Dravidian divide in in India. Its always average which counts, posting one picture doesnt prove anything. Especially when we all know who get leading roles in bollywood over Dravidians looking Indians.

And those 5-6% are most likely austroloid mixed hybrids. Arya now means noble but at one point that group existed and enslaved Indians.
 
Again looking at skin tone instead of facial features which shows your inferiority complex.

A vast majority of Indians are distinctly caucasian as are pakistanis , so where is the difference ? And majority of pashtuns look very indic to me and no one in India would know in a crowd whether someone is pashtun or UPite .
Anthropology and genetic tests especially shows there is clear difference

What genetic tests ? Please enlighten me !
I know Dravidian in linguistic group, that's why there is no difference between north Indians and south Indians.

There are many Northies who can pass for south indians and vice versa but I can easily tell a dark skinned Haryanvi/gujarati from a fair skinned tamil/malayali most of the times . North Indians have sharper features and look more caucasoid on average than south Indians .
we all know who get leading roles in bollywood over Dravidians looking Indians.

What is a dravidian look mate ? Have you seen Rahul dravid ? He is a dravidian but looks more caucasian than any pakistani. Not just him but all Indian cricketers look much better looking than their pakistani counterparts

And most of the actors and almost all of the actresses in bollywood are from so called dravidian areas . MA Jinnah was a gujarati . Did he look dravidian to you as well ?

And those 5-6% are most likely austroloid mixed hybrids. Arya now means noble but at one point that group existed and enslaved Indians.

All your bs theories are just speculations . There are no australoids in north east and ladakh , himachal , uttarakhand where there are sizeable populations of mongoloids . Australoids are found in the jungles of central India and look very different from any other Indian .

And as I already said that aryan is not a race and anyone can be aryan . So your last line doesn't hold much water .
 

Back
Top Bottom