JF-17 and JAS GRIPEN 39

[Malik Alashter]

I would like to start this thread about 2 airplane belong to same category the jf-17 & jas gripen just to see how close the jf-17 to the gripen in terms of technology and the ability in a2a a2g.

 

[Safriz]

there is tons of information on the subject already posted on the forum.....no need of a new thread.
I am not discouraging you...but do try to use the search function on the website.

 

[Malik Alashter]

But I didn't see one as comparison between the two I realy would like to see talk about what this have what that have to reach a conclusion of them, I hope every one here help in this thread to get the real picture.

 

[Nishan_101]

Although there are some features that should be included in the PT-06 which nor the Chinese neither the PAC has included and left it on the block-IIs were:
Extensive use of Composites.
RD-93Bs from Russia.
Retractable In Flight Re-fueling Probe.
FLIR (If it was ready).

Then this Aircraft might have exceeded the current performance it offers and more over they can then develop a dual seat version that can also be marketed as LIFT as well as for the conversion of JF-17. I am sure that these measure would have attracted more customers towards it.

 

[Malik Alashter]

Although there are some features that should be included in the PT-06 which nor the Chinese neither the PAC has included and left it on the block-IIs were:
Extensive use of Composites.
RD-93Bs from Russia.
Retractable In Flight Re-fueling Probe.
FLIR (If it was ready).

Then this Aircraft might have exceeded the current performance it offers and more over they can then develop a dual seat version that can also be marketed as LIFT as well as for the conversion of JF-17. I am sure that these measure would have attracted more customers towards it.

great info can you match it with th gripen.

 

[Nishan_101]

Yeah! If these features would have been included then it will surely have a normal payload of 4500Kg and a maximum payload of 4800-5000 Kg. And more over a much stealthy airframe then gripen but the range would be similar or a bit less but it could be countered with external fuel tanks and In Flight re-fuelings.

 

[Manticore]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-thunder/61786-arguments-choosing-thunder-over-gripen.html
http://www.defence.pk/forums/jf-17-thunder/71435-jf-17-thunder-information-pool.html

there were 2 pre-existant threads on gripen-- here is one of them