What's new

Pakistan, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan have an agreement to commence the construction of a 760-kilometer-long Railway link

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
101,783
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
.,.,
- Pakistan, Afghanistan and Uzbekistan have formally entered into an agreement by signing a protocol to commence the construction of a 760-kilometer-long railway track connecting Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan.

- This significant project, known as the Termiz-Logar-Kharlachi railway, is poised to have a substantial impact on regional connectivity and trade in the area.

- Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan stand to benefit greatly from this initiative as it will facilitate the efficient and cost-effective transfer of goods and commodities, bolstering trade relations and enhancing #economic growth in the region.

- The railway project will open up new opportunities for businesses and investors, encouraging cross-border investments and the establishment of trade routes that were previously hindered by logistical challenges.


1689705754823.png
 
bit late isn't it?

when will it start construction ?
 
What gauge have they chosen?

Never too late
The best time was yesterday, the second best is today. The sooner it’s built it will allow Central Asia to trade internationally without more options, via a corridor that goes through Pakistan. :)


The second and third screenshots in the following video show details of the route

Supposedly it will take 5 years to build (hopefully by when we will have started to and completed the upgrading of ML-1 to benefit from the new Trans-Afghan Railway).

Any indication the Uzbeks and the Kazakhs are upgrading their freight railway network in anticipation of this afghan railway?


BTW, the Kyrgyz have a railway link to China and could function as the shortest link from the Pakistani railway network to the Chinese railway network in Southern Xinjiang, while Kazakhstan has a crossing at Khorgos in Northern Xinjiang.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't Afghanistan responsible for attacks in Pakistan? How can you have a railway link between two countries that accuse each other of sowing instability?
 
Wasn't Afghanistan responsible for attacks in Pakistan? How can you have a railway link between two countries that accuse each other of sowing instability?

We will consult you Dutch if we establish a slave trade through the Stan corridor. Till then wait for it
 
We will consult you Dutch if we establish a slave trade through the Stan corridor. Till then wait for it

Don't you guys claim that the Taliban aren't doing enough to stop the TTP? Now you want a rail link that goes through the heartland of TTP?
 
Don't you guys claim that the Taliban aren't doing enough to stop the TTP? Now you want a rail link that goes through the heartland of TTP?

Because we have common sense for it
 
Because we have common sense for it

You are clueless. Your military blames the Taliban for not doing enough against TTP attacks and sanctuaries. Now you are signing deals with the same Taliban that your military accuses of sowing instability in Pakistan.
 
You are clueless. Your military blames the Taliban for not doing enough against TTP attacks and sanctuaries. Now you are signing deals with the same Taliban that your military accuses of sowing instability in Pakistan.

I don't think the Taliban got a mention in the statement or the presser.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom