What's new

U.S 'agrees NEW Afghan supply route'

Beskar

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
4,176
Reaction score
4
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7839265.stm

The US says a new supply path to Afghanistan has been agreed with Central Asian states and Russia as an option to the troubled Pakistan route.



US Central Command chief Gen David Petraeus made the announcement on a visit to Islamabad.

The route through the Khyber Pass has been closed several times in recent months after militants attacks.

Gen David Petraeus has met President Asif Ali Zardari and other leading figures on his one-day trip.

The visit comes after a week-long tour of Central Asian states.

Public anger

Gen Petraeus said the Pakistan route had been flowing "generally freely" in recent weeks but that the US and Nato had sought "additional logistical routes from the north".

He added: "There have been agreements reached and there are transit lines now and transit agreements for commercial goods and services in particular that include several countries in the Central Asian states and also Russia."

The BBC's Barbara Plett in Islamabad says most of Nato's supplies are transported overland through Pakistan, but support for the Nato war effort in Afghanistan is unpopular in Pakistan and supply trucks have increasingly been attacked by local militants.

She says reports from the meetings also suggest that Pakistan expressed concern about US missile strikes against suspected Taleban and al-Qaeda militants in its border region.

Islamabad says this triggers public anger, which undermines its own counter-terrorism efforts.

Our correspondent says there has been no formal indication that this policy might change under the new US administration, although a senior official of Barack Obama's Democratic party has questioned whether the missile strikes are counterproductive.

At his press conference, Gen Petraeus said the US would continue to help Pakistan tackle terrorism and militancy in the tribal areas.

"It is clearly in the interest of all countries involved that Pakistan succeed in dealing with its internal problems," he said.

Pakistan's actions and arrests following the Mumbai (Bombay) attacks were also discussed.

The general said the US and the international community would continue to support Pakistan, but Pakistan must also put its house in order on the issue of militants.

'Risky'


Gen Petraeus is a key advocate of a major US troop surge in Afghanistan.

The US has said it is sending up to 30,000 new troops to Afghanistan this year to take on a resurgent Taleban. They will join 33,000 US and 32,000 other Nato troops already in the country.

This is Gen Petraeus's second visit to Pakistan since taking up his new position.

He was until recently commander of the US military in Iraq.

He was widely credited with improving security there through the "surge" plan, which saw nearly 30,000 US troops deployed to trouble spots.

However, Afghanistan's ambassador to the US, Said Jawad, recently said that a plan similar to the one in Iraq that formed local tribal groups to help combat the insurgency was "very risky".
 
Last edited:
I am kind of confused isnt part of these Talibans from some of thses states uzbeks and others but the good news is it wont be our headache any more.
 
I am kind of confused isnt part of these Talibans from some of thses states uzbeks and others but the good news is it wont be our headache any more.

Without a supply line going through Pakistan, Americans would cash in on this opportunity to increase their strikes within our territory. Which in my opinion, is a scary thought.
 
I think US and NATO need to pay Afghani warlords and regional commanders of Taliban otherwise things will become very difficult for them.
 
I dont think relations with Russia and America will be that easy going.

Kyrgyzstan to close American airbase
Sunday, January 18, 2009
BISHKEK: Kyrgystan will order the closure of a US military airbase used to support operations in Afghanistan ‘in a matter of days’ under pressure from Russia, a senior Kyrgyz official told AFP.

“The presidential decree on the annulment of the agreement with the United States is already prepared. In a matter of days it will be published in the Kyrgyz media,” the official told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The official said Russia had urged Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev to announce the closure of the base in exchange for financial help to the cash-strapped Central Asian nation.

Russian officials have discussed extending Kyrgyzstan a 300-million-dollar loan as well as $1.7 billion of investment in the energy sector of the ex-Soviet republic.

“In exchange for such a large loan the Kremlin asked Bakiyev to voice the decision about the pull-out of the US airbase from Kyrgyzstan before his official visit to Moscow,” the official said.

Bakiyev’s press service has said he will visit Moscow on February 3. Russia has sought the closure of the base, which is a symbol of US influence in post-Soviet Central Asia, a region long dominated by Moscow.

Kyrgyz officials said in December that they were preparing to close the base, located at Manas outside the Kyrgyz capital Bishkek, but the United States denied that there were any plans to do so.

The base is home to about 1,200 foreign military personnel, mainly from the United States, and acts as a staging post for operations in Afghanistan, located to the south.

It was opened after the Sept 11, 2001 attacks to support US-led operations in Afghanistan.

In recent months there have been a number of street demonstrations demanding the closure of the base, which is next to the country’s main international airport.

There have been tensions with the local population. A US guard shot dead a Kyrgyz truck driver in 2006 in what US officials said was self-defence.

Kyrgyzstan to close American airbase
 
I think US and NATO need to pay Afghani warlords and regional commanders of Taliban otherwise things will become very difficult for them.

That was the reason they went in there for. To eliminate the warlord and taliban system. Their policies have failed miserably and things are still difficult for them as they were since day one.
 
That was the reason they went in there for. To eliminate the warlord and taliban system. Their policies have failed miserably and things are still difficult for them as they were since day one.

Yes and these thing will even rise in future...its nearly impossible for them to eliminate the whole system as there is Phustoon uprising too.
 
Without a supply line going through Pakistan, Americans would cash in on this opportunity to increase their strikes within our territory. Which in my opinion, is a scary thought.

Hooray! When we have established an alternate to Pakistan for NATO/US supplies to Afghanistan then we can missile strike, high altitude bomb and even send in special forces to FATA with less hassle from Islamabad.

:usflag: :usflag:
 
Hooray! When we have established an alternate to Pakistan for NATO/US supplies to Afghanistan then we can missile strike, high altitude bomb and even send in special forces to FATA with less hassle from Islamabad.

:usflag: :usflag:

Clearly you think that'll be a walk in the park. Why is it so common for the Americans to confuse every Muslim country with Iraq and Afghanistan?
 
Clearly you think that'll be a walk in the park. Why is it so common for the Americans to confuse every Muslim country with Iraq and Afghanistan?

We aren't confused. We know where Terror Central is located .......

PS. I didn't say "no" hassle, I said less hassle ......
 
In my opinion this is good news for us, now the Taliban can focus their activities on the new supply line that Americans will open. It means less hassle for us, already the people in Pakistan are suffering from this nightmare that is taking place. We need to isolate these terrorists and push them out of our country. Push them back to Afghanistan, let the American and the NATO forces fight them. We dont want to make our country a warzone, all these suicide bombings are a total nightmare.
 
We aren't confused. We know where Terror Central is located .......

where is it located dont look from your black eye to Pakistan we will make ICBMS n Nuke you kid.If we provide taliban with a little support you will ran out and if you dont want to go easy than prepare the confins for your 300,000 troops ok US has a big whole inside.WE HAVE DEFEATED RUSSIA NO ONE CAN RULE US MUSLIMS !

EDIT - 72% OF KABUL CONTROLLED BY TALIBAN YOU MUST GIVE SOME HEART TO YOUR ARMY N AIR FORCE PROVIDE THEM MORALES>
 
WE HAVE DEFEATED RUSSIA NO ONE CAN RULE US MUSLIMS !

You are SO delusional! It will take you another century to make an ICBM that could reach the US. By then we will have a death ray that will identify any Jihadi by brain waves and take him out. So beware. You never know where the next CIA drone or death ray will strike.....
 
We aren't confused. We know where Terror Central is located .......

PS. I didn't say "no" hassle, I said less hassle ......

And how EXACTLY has that terror centre created any troubles for the Americans or NATO? (Please, don't say 9/11. Our views differ on that) Those terror centres came into MORE power instead of getting demolished, thanks to the useless antics of American Forces and it's allies.

Get out of Afghanistan and Iraq, and these terror centres wouldn't bother your kind.
 
:wave:
You are SO delusional! It will take you another century to make an ICBM that could reach the US. By then we will have a death ray that will identify any Jihadi by brain waves and take him out. So beware. You never know where the next CIA drone or death ray will strike.....

you will see so as India n Israel we're coming for you :guns::mod:
 

Back
Top Bottom