West vs East Pakistan - Separation debate on economical stand

[BHarwana]

@Joe Shearer I posted the data and you cannot blame resource allocation for partition other provinces were getting much less even though there had more burden of migration. Now I know the real reason behind the movement and I can post it but no one will like it here so my point that we looted east is proven. That never happened.

 

[Joe Shearer]

A small observation:

Dear Sir , Right after Partition ??????? Are you very seriously asking these questions??? Sir G Pakistan almost started with dam ZZZZEEERRROOO .
Almost all educated elite (bureaucracy) migrated to India , because of Hindu-ism (I don't mind it ) , Almost all major Industries went to India , All major Electric power plant went to India too . JUT industries in Bangal went to India(majority of them) ……
Sir G , after what we (Combined Pakistan) got after 47 , I think we did a dam great Job .
Land reforms, establishing JUT industry I think these are one of those Acts which can be counted as income disparities countermeasures , But if one really want too.

The jute industry was divided down the middle, so to speak. Almost ALL the jute was grown in East Bengal; almost all of it was processed in West Bengal. For about 30 miles, on both sides of the River Hooghly, there were magnificent jute processing plants - factories - lining the river banks, largely idle, because all the raw materials were grown across the border. And, across that border, all the farmers of jute faced ruin because there was no one to take their produce.

India didn't get much from the jute industry.

 

[CHACHA"G"]

inequility.

Explain in detail ???????? How so ?????? With data ………. Keep in mind East WAS 1 province
Thanks a lot

 

[Joe Shearer]

@Joe Shearer I posted the data and you cannot blame resource allocation for partition other provinces were getting much less even though there had more burden of migration. Now I know the real reason behind the movement and I can post it but no one will like it here so my point that we looted east is proven. That never happened.

Now I know the real reason behind the movement and I can post it but no one will like it here so my point that we looted east is proven.

Are you serious when you write this? You can't give the reasons, and the reasons show that you are right?

 

[CHACHA"G"]

A small observation:



The jute industry was divided down the middle, so to speak. Almost ALL the jute was grown in East Bengal; almost all of it was processed in West Bengal. For about 30 miles, on both sides of the River Hooghly, there were magnificent jute processing plants - factories - lining the river banks, largely idle, because all the raw materials were grown across the border. And, across that border, all the farmers of jute faced ruin because there was no one to take their produce.

India didn't get much from the jute industry.

Sir G ,Industries remained in East also went to India , because of their owners and workers , I am not saying you guys took great advantage from it. JUT industries were on decline in 50s and in 60s they almost ended.
If you don't mind me saying this ,,,,,,, WHITE Raj destroyed it systematically …….. But From Bangalis we (West Pakistanis) Take all the blame.

 

[Mage]

Dear Sir , Right after Partition ??????? Are you very seriously asking these questions??? Sir G Pakistan almost started with dam ZZZZEEERRROOO .
Almost all educated elite (bureaucracy) migrated to India , because of Hindu-ism (I don't mind it ) , Almost all major Industries went to India , All major Electric power plant went to India too . JUT industries in Bangal went to India(majority of them) ……
Sir G , after what we (Combined Pakistan) got after 47 , I think we did a dam great Job .
Land reforms, establishing JUT industry I think these are one of those Acts which can be counted as income disparities countermeasures , But if one really want too.

Dear, Sir, East side also had zero. And you can see just after partition Eastern side was a bit poorer than western side. But after 20 years it became way more poorer. Please explain this.

Is this not discrimination?

 

[Joe Shearer]

@Joe Shearer I posted the data and you cannot blame resource allocation for partition other provinces were getting much less even though there had more burden of migration. Now I know the real reason behind the movement and I can post it but no one will like it here so my point that we looted east is proven. That never happened.

You need to do a very simple exercise: work out the per capital allocations. That will give you many of the answers that seem to be dodging you so well.

 

[Mage]

Explain in detail ???????? How so ?????? With data ………. Keep in mind East WAS 1 province
Thanks a lot

Why more was spent on Punjab than East Pakistan?

 

[Dubious]

Don't live in denial.

Population growth was roughly same...it was a bit higher in East Pakistan. But nowhere near that high to justify such inequility.

No one is justifying it...You asked, derailed the thread and we told!

I guess @waz was right you cant keep positivism in BD threads!

East Pakistan produced less than Punjab?

Today Bangladesh's industrial output is 20% higher than all of Pakistan. What was holding it back from 47-71?

And based on what logic money were being allocated among provinces?

You want to talk about economics? Yes it was screwed up but not as bad as you want it to be!

By debating and talking about it day and night, you achieve zilch! CONGRATULATIONS you have derailed the thread with your negative energy! Now you may leave as you stated 3-5 pages ago!

@BHarwana I am going to close this thread, BD does not want to see even a drop of nice...they need Pakistan to be the enemy to justify their need to be independent! I cant understand why cant they be independent and happy just like how they want!

 

[BHarwana]

Now I know the real reason behind the movement and I can post it but no one will like it here so my point that we looted east is proven.

Are you serious when you write this? You can't give the reasons, and the reasons show that you are right?

The point that we looted east has been proven the data and development is all here. They were getting the money.

 

[Mage]

No one is justifying it...You asked, derailed the thread and we told!

I guess @waz was right you cant keep positivism in BD threads!



You want to talk about economics? Yes it was screwed up but not as bad as you want it to be!

By debating and talking about it day and night, you achieve zilch! CONGRATULATIONS you have derailed the thread with your negative energy! Now you may leave as you stated 3-5 pages ago!

@BHarwana I am going to close this thread, BD does not want to see even a drop of nice...they need Pakistan to be the enemy to justify their need to be independent! I cant understand why cant they be independent and happy just like how they want!

Thread ban me. And delete my posts. I don't want to ruin your joy.

 

[JohnWick]

Why more was spent on Punjab than East Pakistan?

I think population effect !..ma boi.

 

[CHACHA"G"]

Why more was spent on Punjab than East Pakistan?

Sir G that is not my Answer ……. Please Answer my question first ….. Thanks a lot.

BD does not want to see even a drop of nice...they need Pakistan to be the enemy to justify their need to be independent!

I told you this...….. sir g. they need us as scapegoat...…..

 

[Mage]

@Imran Khan you need to come here and see how you guys are desperately obsessing over Bangladesh.

I will leave this thread then. Feel good here. Because the way Pakistan is going, I don't think you guys get many chance to feel good nowadays. So, please feel good by justifying your past mistakes.

Adios.

 

[BHarwana]

This is a development thread @Joe Shearer there are other evidence which are political to prove other wise. Pakistan was giving Bangladesh more than they were producing. In ayub era they got a lot and before that they them selves were PM and president of whole Pakistan.