What's new

Babri Masjid verdict - the Shahadat of Babri Masjid justified by Indian courts

TechLahore

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
1,741
Reaction score
0
Very, very disappointing... the violent destruction of Babri Masjid by Advani and BJP has been upheld by the Indian courts. The people who destroyed the mosque have not been punished, and the main area of the mosque has been forcibly taken away from the muslims.

Between what is happening in Kashmir, and this sort of official government sanction of violence against muslims and muslim holy sites, the future appears quite bleak...
 
sir ji already thread running on it.verdict hasnt been announced yet.this is the assumption of the lawyers.
 
9-30-2010_121646_1.gif


1947--The Partition was right
 
sir ji already thread running on it.verdict hasnt been announced yet.this is the assumption of the lawyers.

Federation to keep Babri mosque land: India court

Updated at: 1600 PST, Thursday, September 30, 2010
LUCKNOW: The three judges of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court gave separate judgements in the Ramjanambhoomi-Babri Masjid case today, Geo News reported Thursday.

The court said in its verdict the issue between the Hindus and Muslims should be resolved through negotiations between the two sides.

According to Indian media, the judges who gave the verdict tendered the resignation.

The controversial land of Babri Masjid will remain in possession of the federation, as the case of Sunni Board has been dismissed, according to media reports.

Hundreds of journalists from across the country converged at the District Magistrate's office in Qaiserbagh area here to report on the verdict in the decades old Ramjanmabhoomi- Babri Masjid title suit.

Elaborate arrangements have been put in place and a special 'pandal' that can accommodate 500 journalists and camerapersons has been erected right opposite the court premises.

Multi-layered security apparatus has been activated around the High Court premises where entry of persons has been restricted. Barricades have been put up on roads leading to the High Court.

Several shops and business establishments, which were open earlier in the day, downed their shutters as the time of the verdict advanced.

Inside the court premises, the passage leading to Court No. 21, where the verdict in the six-decade-old case was pronounced, has been cordoned off and entry has been allowed only to the parties to the dispute and their lawyers.

Heavy presence of police personnel was seen on the way near Court Nos. 18, 19 and 20 and the special Ramjanmabhoomi- Babri Masjid section near Court No. 21.

Bomb disposal squads and sniffer dogs made rounds of the Court No 21 before Justices D V Sharma, Sudhir Agarwal and S U Khan pronounced the verdict.

There was a large police presence in the DM office but journalists seemed to outnumber them as scribes armed with laptops and microphones were seen milling around the area waiting for the verdict.

Police were allowing entry to journalists inside the premises through a small gate at the rear side of the DM Office compound after checking the identity cards.

The destruction of the Babri Mosque at Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, in 1992, demonstrated the power of religious fundamentalism in India, which prides itself on its democracy and religious tolerance.

Then, 150,000 Kar Sevaks, or volunteers, followed LK Advani and other leaders of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party to Ayodhya, where they destroyed the Babri Mosque and electrified Indian politics for the two decades which followed.

In the immediate aftermath, riots claimed more than 2,000 lives in cities throughout India. In Mumbai, terrorists killed more than 250 people in a series of bombings believed to have been in retaliation for Muslim deaths in the post-Ayodhya riots.

Riots flared again in Gujarat in 2002 after Muslims burned alive 59 Hindus they believed were returning from desecrating the mosque at Ayodhya. More than a thousand people were killed in riots throughout the state.

The dispute dates back to 1853, more than 300 years after the mosque was built by one of Emperor Babur's generals following their defeat of a local Hindu king.

According to Hindu campaigners, Lord Rama, one of their most revered deities, was born on the site, and an 11th Century Ram temple stood there until it was destroyed by troops loyal to Babur, the Muslim conqueror and India's first Mughal emperor. The general, Mir Baqi, named the mosque in his emperor's honour, but it became more commonly known as 'Masjid -i-Janmasthan' – Mosque of the Birthplace – in acknowledgement of Rama's birth there.

Since the first Hindu-Muslim clash was recorded over the issue in 1853, there have been intermittent protests and petitions by each side to establish their claim to the site.

The case which was decided at Allahabad High Court today was launched in 1992 and sought to determine the rightful title owner of the plot, whether the site was the birthplace of Lord Rama, and whether the mosque was built on the site of an ancient Hindu temple.

Federation to keep Babri mosque land: India court - GEO.tv
 
sir ji already thread running on it.verdict hasnt been announced yet.this is the assumption of the lawyers.

It appears to be confirmed by all the TV channels I have watched.

The net-net is that 2/3rds of the land of the Babri mosque has been snatched away from the muslims, the destruction of their mosque has been validated, no punishment has been meted out to Advani or the mob that illegally destroyed a place of worship and the desire of india's muslims to obtain some semblance of justice has been crushed.
 
It appears to be confirmed by all the TV channels I have watched.

The net-net is that 2/3rds of the land of the Babri mosque has been snatched away from the muslims, the destruction of their mosque has been validated, no punishment has been meted out to Advani or the mob that illegally destroyed a place of worship and the desire of india's muslims to obtain some semblance of justice has been crushed.

1/3 has been given to Muslims so they can build a masjid there if they wish. why does size of the land matter?
 
Apparently except Nirmohi Akhada no one else id happy with the verdict. What the heck is Nirmohi Akhada anyway?
 
Baburi masjid is all over in this forum, please merge them all toghter.
 
Very, very disappointing... the violent destruction of Babri Masjid by Advani and BJP has been upheld by the Indian courts. The people who destroyed the mosque have not been punished, and the main area of the mosque has been forcibly taken away from the muslims.

Between what is happening in Kashmir, and this sort of official government sanction of violence against muslims and muslim holy sites, the future appears quite bleak...

The case being discussed is 50 years old. 30 years older than the event you are mentioning. Its a civil case on the dispute of title to the land in question. The criminal case on destruction is proceeding separately..
 
Very, very disappointing... the violent destruction of Babri Masjid by Advani and BJP has been upheld by the Indian courts. The people who destroyed the mosque have not been punished, and the main area of the mosque has been forcibly taken away from the muslims.

Between what is happening in Kashmir, and this sort of official government sanction of violence against muslims and muslim holy sites, the future appears quite bleak...

It appears to be confirmed by all the TV channels I have watched.

The net-net is that 2/3rds of the land of the Babri mosque has been snatched away from the muslims, the destruction of their mosque has been validated, no punishment has been meted out to Advani or the mob that illegally destroyed a place of worship and the desire of india's muslims to obtain some semblance of justice has been crushed.

The case being discussed is 50 years old. 30 years older than the event you are mentioning. Its a civil case on the dispute of title to the land in question. The criminal case on destruction is proceeding separately..

C'mon TL, not you too. We have enough rabble rousers on this forum without you having to join them. Karan is right & this in no way affects the criminal case of the demolition as of now.
 
It appears to be confirmed by all the TV channels I have watched.

The net-net is that 2/3rds of the land of the Babri mosque has been snatched away from the muslims, the destruction of their mosque has been validated, no punishment has been meted out to Advani or the mob that illegally destroyed a place of worship and the desire of india's muslims to obtain some semblance of justice has been crushed.

Why dont you first read all the relevant material before making statements like that?

The cases against Advani is a separate from the case of disputed land. The court findings have proved that the disputed site was the birthplace of Lord Ram.

Now, if u still want to move forward with your incorrect and biased opinions, its upto u.
 
Very, very disappointing... the violent destruction of Babri Masjid by Advani and BJP has been upheld by the Indian courts. The people who destroyed the mosque have not been punished, and the main area of the mosque has been forcibly taken away from the muslims.

Between what is happening in Kashmir, and this sort of official government sanction of violence against muslims and muslim holy sites, the future appears quite bleak...

?????????

From where you get it plz don't quote zaid hamid.

Hon'ble High Court ruling including 1 Muslim judge have said that divide the site into 3 and give 1 part to Muslims.


The court's case is based on evidence and rule of law.
 
Apparently except Nirmohi Akhada no one else id happy with the verdict. What the heck is Nirmohi Akhada anyway?


A Hindu sect given land and permission to do Puja in front of Babri Masjid by Moughal ruler Akbar himself.

The Nirmohi Akhada is owner of that land since Akbar's time and they regularly do puja from that time till date.
 
A Hindu sect given land and permission to do Puja in front of Babri Masjid by Moughal ruler Akbar himself.

The Nirmohi Akhada is owner of that land since Akbar's time and they regularly do puja from that time till date.

Correction:-

Its not the owner of the land, instead its the caretaker of the land.
 

Back
Top Bottom