What's new

India - Pakistan conflict analysis - aims, tactics, strategy, results

@meghdut

Here we have an insight into the reasons for the success of IA 1 Independent Armoured Brigade, in the absence of the scouting and reconnaissance components of 11 Division. The weakness in engineering was the reason for the fatal delay of 7th September, that gap day between the driving back of 4 Mountain Infantry Division and mounting the overdue attack on the withdrawn infantry battalions in their new positions between Chima and Lakhna, around Mahmudpura. Note, too, that while the PA artillery was very aggressive in meeting the advance by IA infantry advancing towards Kasur, and engaged in trying to cross the Ruhi Nulla or the main canal, it was unable to provide quite the same assistance to the charging PA armour.

A few words about the defending PA 11 Division.
It was facing several problems of its own, since it had just been raised.
- It was NOT having its R&S unit.
-It Engineer unit was short of all sorts of equipment, including bridges.
-Signal unit was also short of communication sets.
-It had no S&T unit.
-6 Lancers, the divisional armor unit, was equipped with the older version of M47 tanks.
-Divisional artillery was having mix calibres.

@meghdut

Please note that some of this is thinking aloud, and ruminating on what @PanzerKiel has already written as commentary. If you have time, just read these.
 
@meghdut

Here we have an insight into the reasons for the success of IA 1 Independent Armoured Brigade, in the absence of the scouting and reconnaissance components of 11 Division. The weakness in engineering was the reason for the fatal delay of 7th September, that gap day between the driving back of 4 Mountain Infantry Division and mounting the overdue attack on the withdrawn infantry battalions in their new positions between Chima and Lakhna, around Mahmudpura. Note, too, that while the PA artillery was very aggressive in meeting the advance by IA infantry advancing towards Kasur, and engaged in trying to cross the Ruhi Nulla or the main canal, it was unable to provide quite the same assistance to the charging PA armour.



@meghdut

Please note that some of this is thinking aloud, and ruminating on what @PanzerKiel has already written as commentary. If you have time, just read these.
I followed this thread diligently till now. I read an interesting speculation by Sukhwant Singh. He speculates that both PA and IA were British trained , most of their Sr Officers were at that time KCIOs and so highly influenced by British style of warfare which favoured defensive approach, achieving overwhelming superiority in numbers and firepower and trade space for time till such conditions are met. Also whenever attacking use attrition rather than manoeuvre to achieve victory.
He moreover argues that such tactic was bound to fail in short wars fought in the subcontinent hence was ill suited for both armies. He concludes saying that the same attitude actually bolstered the defensive potential of both armies at the cost of their offensive capabilities. So both performed better in defence than while attacking which manifested itself Asal Uttar and Chawinda battles to the less than satisfactory performance of both countries premier armoured formations.
 
@meghdut

These showed up, as we see, in the narration itself, vividly.

A word about 4 Mountain Division...

Their orders were
-secure area east of BRB
-destroy bridge on Khem Karan-Kasur road.
-Contain any PA offensive.

4 Mountain Division had also its fair share of problems...
-It had only two brigades*.
-It was a mountain division, not trained or organized to fight in the plains**.
-They had 75 mm RRs instead of 105/106...moreover these they had only at the rate of 4/unit instead of normal 6/unit**.
-9 H was placed under command at the last moment, once they started their move, therefore no coordination or marrying up could be done^.
-Its artillery was ill-organized for giving fire support in plains***.

The reasons for the disastrous attacks by 4 Mountain Division are very clearly outlined by these points.
  1. (*)Lower than normal strength of infantry;
  2. (**) Not organised for plains fighting;
  3. (***)Artillery uncertain about plains conditions;
  4. (^) No coordination with Deccan Horse (General Vaidya's regiment), who fought very well on their own in the rescue of the isolated two companies of Dogras, and in shielding the defeated infantry formations digging in, but as isolates, not as a coordinated, integrated effort.
We learn from this that if some few factors on the PA side had come together, we might have had a different situation altogether.

I followed this thread diligently till now. I read an interesting speculation by Sukhwant Singh. He speculates that both PA and IA were British trained , most of their Sr Officers were at that time KCIOs and so highly influenced by British style of warfare which favoured defensive approach, achieving overwhelming superiority in numbers and firepower and trade space for time till such conditions are met. Also whenever attacking use attrition rather than manoeuvre to achieve victory.
He moreover argues that such tactic was bound to fail in short wars fought in the subcontinent hence was ill suited for both armies. He concludes saying that the same attitude actually bolstered the defensive potential of both armies at the cost of their offensive capabilities. So both performed better in defence than while attacking which manifested itself Asal Uttar and Chawinda battles to the less than satisfactory performance of both countries premier armoured formations.

Reasonable, but please recall the comment - can't remember the exact location - about the PA being better in attack and the IA being better in defence. Or did I imagine that? It sounds so apt.
 
All the events described above took place on the 6th of September, and by the night, Major General Gurbaksh Singh felt the need for moral sustenance and sent a messenger to the Army Commander, stating, effectively, that 4 Mountain Division had cracked up. For Gurbaksh (gifted by the Guru) to seek help from Harbaksh (gifted by God) was quite appropriate, but the GOC-in-C, after having been woken up at 3 in the morning with this message, decided to check for himself before taking any action.

There is an error here. It was Lt. Gen. J. S. Dhillon, GOC, XI Corps, who concluded that 4 Mountain Infantry Division was beaten and needed replacement. Maj. Gen. Gurbaksh Singh of 4 Mountain Infantry Division, had NOT written off his own command, and was working hard to set up defences against the inevitable PA riposte. When Lt. Gen. Harbaksh Singh arrived on the scene, Maj. Gen. Gurbaksh Singh was busy repairing his defences.
 
Last edited:
@PanzerKiel , Just talked with @Joe Shearer , he has already finished with the Asal Uttar battle and wants to put some finishing touches. Unfortunately he has lost network connections completely since morning and can’t even access PDF ( and anything else for that matter) . He wishes to upload it tomorrow if possible and asked me to inform you and other interested members and apologies for the delay.
 
Last edited:
Just got back my connection twenty minutes ago. Will upload to you, @meghdut, for verification, so that an error-free account can be uploaded to PDF. I am five days behind, but will try to make up. The Bajwa and Harbaksh Singh books will help only in the next phase, as it will slow things down if I am to try and read them and make sense of them for the present.

Thanks to all for bearing with me.
 
RECAPITULATION: BEFORE THE BATTLE

To recapitulate:

On the 6th of September, the 62 Brigade of 4 Mountain Infantry Division attacked to the south-west, targeting the bund over the Ruhi Nulla on the main road, and another point on the road going off at an angle to the main road, going to Ganda Singh Wala.

It was also, as a second phase, to go beyond the bunds and reach the Ichhogil Canal from Ballanwala to Ganda Singh Wala, acting in concert with 7 Brigade, that was to reach the Canal further north, in the stretch between Ballanwala and Bedian.

For this, 62 Brigade had three battalions of its own, 9 J&K Rifles, 13 Dogras and 18 Rajputana Rifles, and one battalion from the other brigade, 7 Brigade,1/9 Gorkha Rifles, and also the armoured component, 9 Horse, the Deccan Horse, so, four infantry battalions and an armoured regiment. 9 J&K was to go for the bund on the Ruhi Nulla on the main road Khem Karan - Kasur, 13 Dogra were to take the southern section on the Ganda Singh Wala side. 18 Rajrif were assigned to squeeze out an enclave to the south of the firm ground around Khem Karan; 1/9 Gorkhas remained under the Divisional command for the time being.

62 Brigade won early gains, on the 6th September morning, and lost it all by the evening. 9 J&K Rifles got to the nearside embankment of the bund, but could not cross the Nulla or capture the far side emba/nkment against the heavy and concentrated artillery and tank fire. The Dogras, getting their objectives on the Nulla in the morning, lost it at 13:00 HRS to a mechanised infantry and tank push, preceded by an artillery barrage. We have seen, in the commentary on the action, the unfamiliarity of the artillery component to offering supporting fire in the plains, and to operating in the plains in general. The artillery officers with the battalion could not help; one was wounded, the other missing. By night, the battalion was defeated and retreated; even their firm base was abandoned, and the path was open for the Pakistani counter-attack.

9 J&K Rifles, sheltering around the near-side embankment of the Ruhi Nalla, were victims of the debacle further north. First, 7 Grenadiers, attacking Ballanwala, were repelled by heavy artillery fire. Again, there was no supporting fire from their own artillery, and this time, the problem was with the wireless. Later, in the afternoon, another attack did not come off. Second, 4 Grenadiers attacking Theh Pannun, reached the Canal, but could not blow up the bridge as the Engineering detachment did not turn up. Third, even further north, another team of 7 Grenadiers, supported by a troop of tanks, attacked Waigai; the tanks survived the shelling, the infantry could not brave it, the tanks alone could not hold it, so the party retreated. Fourth, a second attack by 7 Grenadiers on Ballanwala, supported by divisional artillery (mountain artillery fighting in the plains), got them to the eastern, near-side embankment of the Nulla, but heavy firing by Pakistani defenders, using machine guns and mortars, prevented them from going further; the intention was to cross the Nulla and the bund beyond, the western, far-side bund. Under heavy fire, they retreated right up to the Division HQ in Valtoha.

The path lay open for the PA to advance from Kasur or from any point on the Icchogil Canal that was bridged, and then after any bridge on the Nulla.

When the attack came, it was not a frontal attack. Pakistani armour burst out of the Ballanwala bridge at 02:00 HRS; the way ahead directly towards Khem Karan was clear, but the force made a sharp turn parallel to the Nulla it had just crossed, and outflanked the J&K Rifles formation guarding the eastern approach to the bridge across the Nulla on the Kasur-Khem Karan Road. Now this road, too, was open for PA armour to cross over.

The riflemen were split into two by the attack; the CO retreated with two companies, but they lost touch with each other in the darkness and reached Division HQ at Valtoha in bits and pieces. The other two companies, left behind in the confusion, were happily rescued during the course of the day by Deccan Horse.

Major General Gurbaksh Singh had the mortification of seeing two separate battalions, 7 Grenadiers and 9 J&K Rifles, scrambling to reach his HQ position searching for safety. He ordered his divisional artillery commander to target the bridges over the Nulla and, behind it to the West, over the Canal.

The Indian accounts believe that this stemmed the Pakistani advance just sufficiently long enough for 4 Mountain Division to re-group. The Pakistani account points to heavy damage to the Ichhogil Canal bridge due to a tank accident.

The pause enabled Maj. Gen. Gurbaksh Singh to arrange his battered and defeated infantry battalions into a defensive position around Asal Uttar, while he himself shifted his divisional headquarters from Valtoha to Gharyala. The formations were the 1/9 Gorkha Rifles, 4 Grenadiers, 9 J&K Rifles (2 companies at first, 2 more on rescue by Deccan Horse), 13 Dogras and 18 Rajputana Rifles. A minefield was laid around infantry positions by the Engineers, under cover of the tank regiment.

The Deccan Horse shielded these activities, and also rescued 2 companies of 9 J&K Rifles from their precarious position on the Ruhi Nulla, where they had been left behind during the precipitate withdrawal of the other half of the battalion.

With the infantry in place, with their artillery well located and with the integral armour in the shape of the Deccan Horse, 4 Mountain Infantry Division was as ready as it could be, to receive any assault at arms. However, as a matter of abundant precaution, 2 Independent Armoured Brigade was also assigned to keep a watching brief from an immediately rearward location.



THE PAKISTAN ARMY PLAN: BRIDGEHEAD, BREAKTHROUGH,
EXPLOITATION


In simple terms, the Pakistan Army plan was a classic:

  • an Infantry Division reinforced by additional armour would break into Indian defences and form a bridgehead;
  • a strong Armoured Division would then pass through and break out through the weakened Indian perimeter;
  • in the final step, the Armoured Division would travel at speed through undefended Indian hinterland, reaching strategic objectives rapidly.
So Major General Abdul Hamid’s 11 Infantry Division would undertake the first step. It consisted of a strong line-up of two infantry brigades and a strong Patton-tank equipped armoured regiment; it would be reinforced by another Armoured Brigade to assault the Indian defences.

The break through by a strong Armoured Division was assigned to the crack 1 Armoured Division. Commanded by Major General Nasir Ahmed Khan, this division had five regiments, organised as three brigades.

In the exploitation phase, those three brigades would take their own individual routes forward, ensuring that the enemy was continuously under pressure on one or the other front. The routes were formed around initial objectives; the first, the Sutlej bridge over Harike, to be reached the first day (45 kms from Kasur, 35 kms from Khem Karan, as the crow flies); the second, Jandiala Guru, east of Amritsar (45 kms from Harike); the third, the bridge over the Beas (50 kms from Harike), both to be reached on the second day. In other words, in rough daily transit of 40 to 50 kms at a time, not particularly out of reach for M-47 or M-48s, representing perhaps two hours each of unopposed passage, the objectives would be reached, and the next stage of break-out could be decided.

Apart from completely outflanking XI Corps, and finding its way to within 20 kms of the sensitive Sikh centre of Amritsar, to defend which every Sikh in sight would have abandoned whatever he was doing and rushed back, this would find the column, on the second day, in a line with Ludhiana and Chandigarh, equidistant between Srinagar and Delhi, and on the lines of communications between the rest of India and her bases at Udhampur (200 kms) and Pathankot (140 kms).

At the time that the plan might have been made, there might not have been any concrete information available about the Indian I Corps; so this would have looked like an upsized Grand Slam, hooking around Amritsar instead of Jammu, and isolating not just XV Corps, but XI Corps as well.

A quick aside about the topography.

There were two roads out of Khem Karan, one leading to Bhikhiwind, one angled further right to Patti. Asal Uttar, on which village the 4 Mountain Infantry Division defences were based, lies about 5 kms out of Khem Karan on the road to Patti. It is important to know this because Indian deployment was on this crossbar, the Lakhna – Chima Kalan Road. The heavy fighting took place in the region between Asal Uttar and these two villages that are about 11 kms apart.

Interlude: Orientation and the roads around the battlefield The road from Khem Karan to Amritsar is 60 kms, running north by north-east. Five or six kms up the road is the turn to the village of Asal Uttar, as mentioned before; another twenty kms. up is the town of Bhikhiwind, hence the name the Bhikhiwind Road.

On turning right on the Bhikhiwind Road, Asal Uttar is two and a half kilometres away. That road then turns left and heads towards Patti, about twenty five to twenty six kms.away, angling away from the Bhikhiwind Road in the north-east direction. This is what is referred to in the literature as the Bhikhiwind axis, and the Patti axis. The Patti Road also contains, quite close to Asal Uttar, the earlier HQ of 4 Division, Valtoha, and further on the road, towards Patti, the shifted HQ, at Gharyala.

About 20 kms from Asal Uttar, to the right of the Patti Road, is the village of Chima (look for Chima Kalan on Google Maps; Cheema takes you far, far away). To the left of the Patti Road is the other village of Lakhna. Set in a little, it is 5 kms further away from Khem Karan than Chima Kalan. One can imagine the Khem Karan – Patti road as the upright of a ‘T’, and the road connecting Lakhna and Chima Kalan, at right angles to the Khem Karan – Patti Road, would be the crossbar of the ‘T’.

While 4 Mountain Infantry Division had arranged its forces around Asal Uttar, 2 Independent Armoured Brigade was further back, strung out in a north-westerly direction, originally facing towards Khem Karan, between the villages of Chima Kalan and Lakhna. These two are located on the south side and the north side of the road leading from Bhikhiwind to Harike, so effectively, we have a triangle: the base being this road, one side, ending in Asal Uttar, starting from Bhikhiwind; the other side, also ending in Asal Uttar, starting from the intersection of the Bhikhiwind-Harike Road with the Patti road.

THE BATTLE OF ASAL UTTAR - 8TH TO 10TH SEPTEMBER

On the 8th September A preliminary probing attack was launched by Chaffee tanks on the morning of the 8th; they advanced under artillery cover along the Khem Karan – Bhikhiwind axis, and kept advancing even against Indian artillery, and stopped only when brought under fire by the Sherman tanks of Deccan Horse. Since a frontal attack seemed to be likely to face strong opposition, the attacking force split into smaller groups to outflank the firmed up infantry positions. They were fairly successful, and at one stage had surrounded the 1/9 Gorkhas, the 9 J&K Rifles and 62 Brigade HQ. Deccan Horse, in their hyperactive style, came in and mounted a counter-attack, and managed to stall the Chaffee contingent.

But this was a probing attack; the main attack came in the afternoon of the 8th with Patton tanks that overran the 1/9 Gorkhas positions; 4 Grenadiers intervened and knocked out 4 tanks, but that did not stop the bulldozing charge of the MBTs, who broke through all obstacles and overran the trenches of the Grenadiers; they also got into the positions of 18 Rajasthan Rifles, and endangered 7 Brigade HQ.

At this stage, the first of several interventions by 2 Independent Armoured Brigade occurred. 3 Cavalry under Lt. Col. Salim Caleb, stepped in. They had been positioned in the Chima Kalan – Lakhna area, and their intervention cost the attacking force 4 Pattons and a Chaffee. The attack then probed the area to the west of this encounter.

By end of day on the 8th, the PA had successfully advanced from the line of the Ruhi Nulla into the former positions of the 4 Mountain Infantry Division, just before the village of Asal Uttar, and had been probing the prepared defensive positions of the Indians, frequently overrunning the Indian defences, but did not make a break-through; the Chaffees were thwarted by Deccan Horse with its Shermans, the Pattons were halted by 3 Cavalry, fighting Centurions.

On the 9th September The Pakistani attack started at 02:00 HRS. 2 Independent Armoured Brigade had moved its other components into place beside 3 Cavalry into two sickle-shaped formations between Chima Kalan and Lakhna, even before the formal assignment of his brigade to the command of 4 Mountain Infantry Division.

When the attack took place, in spite of heavy artillery, tank and infantry fire from all hands in 4 Div, the tanks kept moving forward, until they hit the minefield laid by the engineers. However, there was to be only minor respite; during the first half of the daylight hours, there were probing attacks, as well as aerial attack.

The heavy all-arms attack came in the afternoon.

First, the softening up. PA artillery opened fire, there was aerial attack as well, for an hour. Then the armour advanced, attacking 18 Rajrif from three directions in their outlying positions. A fierce battle broke out, and the tanks sought to come into redoubts of 18 Rajrif. Indian artillery and armour lay down very heavy defensive fire, but it could not stop the attack. This bitter, close quarters battle continued for some time until Pakistani armour came so deep into the defences of the infantry that relatively close-range weapons came into play. Recoilless rifles and, later, rocket launchers were fired. The attack finally let up at 22:00 HRS.

On the 10th September For a third day in succession, there was a determined effort to break through.


Brigadier Theograj had positioned his 2 Independent Armoured Brigade with the previous two days’ experiences in mind. 8 Cavalry with its AMX 13 light tanks was positioned on the flanks of the layout; it was hoped that this would funnel the Pakistani armour towards the Centurions lined up to meet their advance.

From their movements, it was apparent that the Pakistani armour was trying to outflank the defensive positions by moving north parallel to the Ruhi Nulla, to attack them from behind. However, this had been anticipated, as the main approach through the Bhikhiwind Road had already been reasonably well defended, and an attack on the Indian left flank was also difficult; there was no way to penetrate deep enough across the front of the line of Indian defences to take the attack to the right, to the Indian left flank, that was guarded by another Nulla. Only a deep penetration on the left, that is, on the Indian right flank, remained.

As an outcome of this deconstruction of the tactical alternatives left to the Pakistani forces, and in anticipation of a deep attack down the Indian right flank, along the Nulla, the Nulla had been breached and the water let out, making the fields soggy and muddy and very difficult to traverse for tank, for wheeled vehicle or foot soldiers. There was the additional handicap of the battlefield in general, a factor already mentioned, the high standing crops that took away the range advantage of the Pakistani tanks’ guns, and that allowed their own progress to be tracked by the visible movement of wireless masts on the tanks.

This prompted the Indians to adopt two tactics to address the Pakistani tanks: it was assumed that any infantry might accompany them would be fought off by the Indian infantry. The first was to fire upon the tanks from the Centurions, the moment they emerged from concealment in the cane; the second was to let loose hunter-killer teams with recoilless rifles mounted on 4 wheel drive vehicles, to search for targets of opportunity.

The 4 Grenadiers found themselves under attack first of all, by a battalion of infantry backed up by armour. The tanks managed to overrun some of the trenches, but by their very nature, could not find the main defences. When the 3 Cavalry realised how close the Pattons had got, they advanced, and a melee ensued. This was when Havildar Major Abdul Hamid destroyed three tanks in succession before being shot by the fourth.

It was at this point of the battle that Maj. Gen. Nasir Ahmed Khan, Divisional Commander, 1 Armoured Division (P), was injured by shellfire. He went forward with his reconnaissance team to a very advanced position on the Bhikhiwind Road. Having given his location on a clear message over the radio, he was attacked by a 4 Grenadier raiding party, and also by a very accurate salvo by 4 Division divisional artillery. He was injured, and his divisional artillery commander was killed.

With their thrust down the Bhikhiwind Road being unsuccessful, the next Pakistani effort came on the Patti Road that 10th evening. This push came close to 62 Brigade HQ, but was repelled by 7 Grenadiers, who stepped up in defence, but paid a heavy price, losing four officers in this counter-attack.

By 22:00 HRS, the Pakistani armour started retreating. For all purposes the Battle of Asal Uttar was over.

Afterword: Almost all the battalions of 4 Mountain Infantry Division had proved unable to overcome the impossible odds set them, to tackle fighting in the plains with inadequate artillery organisation or provision, with no anti-tank weapons, or ad hoc supplies almost on the field of battle, and in the teeth of heavy artillery fire and air attack.

13 Dogra was the first; 9 J&K Rifles, with its CO unable to take the strain, broke and ran; 1/9 Gorkha Rifles let down Gorkha tradition by simply melting away from the battlefield, later, once re-grouped, offering little or no resistance to enemy armour attacks; 4 Grenadier and 7 Grenadier both failed to press home attacks, albeit attacks in the teeth of determined opposition, but made up with their stout resistance once reformed and set to defend. The only battalion to emerge with self-esteem intact was the Rajputana Rifles.

The Deccan Horse, under Vaidya, managed to be in six different places at once, and was fortunate that these six places were neither contested hotly by the enemy, nor were subjected to sustained attack.

The unit that distinguished itself at all times in all ways was the 2 Independent Armoured Brigade. They were always ahead of the curve, anticipating both turns in the battle and higher command instructions – Brigadier Theograj had taken up defensive positions to protect the remainder of 4 Division even before receiving orders placing him under Gurbaksh Singh. 3 Cavalry, in particular, shone; its CO, Salim Caleb, went on to Major General rank when he retired.

I have not commented on the Pakistan Army units as this paper is about the Indian Army, and addresses the question of why it failed to win outright victories, given its significant advantages.

THE BATTLE OF KHEM KARAN

What followed this remarkable turn-around by a defeated Division was tragic. Until the ceasefire was declared, Indian forces tried to recapture Khem Karan, and Pakistani forces resisted them every inch of the way.

There were three phases of these events:

  • An attack on Khem Karan by the Indian Army, with the 2 Mahars and 4 Sikhs on the 11th night/12th afternoon, that led to their being repulsed;
  • Several minor actions against enemy positions north-west and south-east of Khem Karan around the 12th/13th, and actions against enemy pockets north-west of Chima (that shows how deep the PA had penetrated) on 15th September;
  • A final attack on the night of the 21st /22nd September that was not pressed home with much determination, and gained little.
Then the ceasefire intervened.

Immediately after the three-and-a-half days of terrible struggle of the Battle of Asal Uttar, the respective commanders’ thoughts must have turned to the next outlook. On the Pakistani side, the impact of the Indian I Corps threatening movements would be occupying their entire attention; in contrast to the units involved under XI Corps, or those under XV Corps, I Armoured Division under the reputed Rajinder Singh would have been a formidable psychological prospect. The Kasur-Khem Karan movement, in contrast, was a brilliant move, but it did not succeed. Nobody could have predicted the Lazarus-like revival of the Indian infantry battalions that were so brutally treated and dismissed during their own attempts at aggression against all reason; all but 13 Dogra made their appearance in the stout defence put up as Asal Uttar, all but 1/9 Gorkhas played their bit in the stormy three days that ensued. There were tragedies, there were comic interludes, to the extent that the grim task of war permits comedy, but from the Indian side, the outstanding images that remain are three – of Rajrif fighting it out toe to toe with formidable Pakistani attacking forces, favoured by the Pakistani brigadier’s repeated recalls to laager, of a promoted Havildar reverted to his platoon, taking on four tanks in a group single-handed, with no doubt in anyone’s mind that ultimately, he would have to pay the price, and a sharp and intelligent tactical decision by a regimental commander and his equally shrewd brigadier to convert the local conditions to suit them, and meeting their opponents’ technically superior equipment with plain, simple but well-rehearsed equipment use.

On the Pakistani side, there is a tragic story of outstanding valour and initiative at the regimental and battalion level, let down by the command failures of their general staff. That is a story for PanzerKiel to tell.

As the two forces faced each other, after the fighting on the 10th September, the uppermost thought in Indian minds was the recovery of Khem Karan. On the very next night after the climactic battle at Asal Uttar, the night of the 11th / 12th September, 7 Brigade was asked to take up the recovery of Khem Karan.

The order of battle had changed.

The ferociously effective 2 Independent Armoured Brigade had been shifted to the area of 15 Infantry Division to bolster the sagging fortunes of that division. In its place, in a manner of speaking, 4 Mountain Infantry Division had got two reinforcements – 2 Independent Armoured Brigade had left behind 2 Mahars, and 4 Sikhs were brought away from 7 Division’s battle at Barki. What people didn’t realise was the 4 Sikhs had made a mark at Barki against heavy odds, and had suffered serious casualties – some 150 dead, wounded or taken prisoner. They should have been rested but when the CO was asked by the Colonel of the Sikh Regiment, that outstanding Sikh chief of Western Command, if he and his men would celebrate the anniversary of Saragarhi by leading the attack, that man felt unable to demur. So they were to go ahead and to get to a point east of Khem Karan before dawn, and wait for the hammer to fall on them acting as anvil; that hammer was to be 2 Mahar, advancing to the right of the town, to the point where the Khem Karan distributary crossed the Bhikhiwind Road, to link up with the Sikhs. 9 J&K Infantry, in spite of its tribulations, overrun by Pakistani armour as it sheltered behind the east bank of the Ruhi Nulla, half of them fled with their CO to safer climes in the vicinity of the Brigade HQ, the abandoned half rescued by Deccan Horse and the enthusiastic Col. Vaidya, was to be in reserve.

4 Sikhs faced tragedy. They got to a suitable point east of Khem Karan, but found themselves next to a sleeping tank laager of Pakistani tanks. They deployed nearby, and the inevitable followed; the CO and more than half the battalion were captured, the rest were casualties.

2 Mahar fared no better. They attacked the outposts, supported by Deccan Horse tanks, and reached the canal distributary, but got no further; there, they were strafed by the PAF, shelled by the PA artillery, lost eight tanks and generally had a terrible morning, on the 12th.

The divisional commander persisted in his attack. The 9 J&K were brought out from reserve, and, together with two troops each of Deccan Horse and 3 Cavalry, attacked again; it didn’t work. They achieved the crossing of the distributary of the canal, and one tank troop reached the outskirts of Khem Karan, but under PAF attack and heavy artillery fire, the rest of the group retreated and the troop that had gone forward was taken prisoner.

  • Several minor actions against enemy positions north-west and south-east of Khem Karan around the 12th/13th, and actions against enemy pockets north-west of Chima (that shows how deep the PA had penetrated) on 15th September;
2 Independent Armoured Brigade reverted to 4 Division at this time, on the 12th. With their help, some positions to the north-west and to the south-east of Khem Karan were cleared. This did not make the slightest difference to the status of Khem Karan.

Reorganised Order of Battle

4 Mountain Infantry Division –

+ 29 Brigade
+ 41 Mountain Infantry Brigade
+ 48 Brigade (from 7 Division)

- 7 Brigade
___________________________________________________________________

29 Brigade

1/5 Gorkha Rifles
2 Madras
+ 13 Dogras

41 Mountain Infantry Brigade

1/8 Gorkha Rifles
3/4 Gorkha Rifles
15 Kumaon

62 Brigade

9 J&K Rifles
18 Rajputana Rifles
- 13 Dogras

One point to observe is the composition of this mountain brigade; except for 2 Madras, all battalions were either hillmen or rifle regiments (18 Rajputana Rifles) – the Gorkhas were, of course, both hillmen and riflemen.

  • A final attack on the night of the 21st /22nd September that was not pressed home with much determination, and gained little.
With this reorganised order of battle, 4 Division sought to make another attempt to recover Khem Karan. However, it was trying to do so with very tired troops. 13 Dogras had been handled very roughly at the preliminary stages of the attack on Kasur; 15 Kumaon had had the unpleasant experience of being swept to one side during the developing phases of Grand Slam; 9 J&K Rifles had suffered a CO who had left his battalion to fend for itself when surprised by Pakistani armour debouching over the bridge over the Ruhi Nulla at Ballanwala; 18 Rajputana Rifles had fought very fiercely during Asal Uttar and had been overrun at least once by Pakistani armour, although they had recovered gallantly.

The plan was made for 41 Brigade to capture Khem Karan outright during the night of the 21st (revised date; the original could not be kept). With the core of the town in hand, the outskirts, east of the town and along the distributary, were to be cleaned up by 29 Brigade immediately thereafter.

The attack was not a success.

None of the battalions pressed home the attack with anything like determination; on the contrary, Pakistani counter-attacks were desperate affairs, mounted with fierce determination, and making no difference that losses were suffered.

CEASEFIRE

A ceasefire, effective from 03:30 HRS on 23rd September, was agreed by both sides.

@PanzerKiel @Cuirassier @jaibi @meghdut
 
Some points of note in this battle are -

There was intelligence failure in not having been able to locate the crack 1 AD . That failure led to the initial debacle while trying to attack.

It also showed that yet again infantry if not properly supported cannot itself prevail against determined defence well covered by artillery and with armour reserves backing it up. 4 mtn was ill equipped to conduct offensive operations, with inadequate artillery, less than normal allocation of AT resource (4 rcl against normal 6). Moreover they trained to operate the lighter 57mm rcl not the heavy 106 and it ought to have caused avoidable confusion on the eve of attack.

4 mtn trained to operate in mountainous Himalayan terrain suitable for infantry operations but not conducive to large scale armoured operations being conducted on this theatre. To use such a unit who was untrained for the terrain also under strength (2 Bde vs normal 3) reflects poorly on Indian offensive preparations. That it was incapable of effective offensive was reflected in it’s subsequent bungling of attacks on Khem Karan. It should however must be pointed out that it did performed admirably well in defensive operations around Asal Uttar, which may have been the way it was trained to operate all along.

Lastly 4 mtn did break from the initial combined arms assaults it faced. S. Singh states that it was the 1st time IA infantrymen were facing major armoured push( Grand Slam was only 2 Patton Regt) and the initial shock may have contributed to the rout. Fortunately however the situation was rectified and the reprieve it got on 7th gave the formation ample time to overcome the initial panic and also receive some morale boost in form of 2 IAB, which if provided earlier may not have resulted in such a fiasco in the first place.

@Joe Shearer ,@PanzerKiel
 
Lastly 4 mtn did break from the initial combined arms assaults it faced. S. Singh states that it was the 1st time IA infantrymen were facing major armoured push( Grand Slam was only 2 Patton Regt) and the initial shock may have contributed to the rout.

A good point, but the Indian Army top leadership knew about the artillery and the armour, and the proposal for pentomic organisation, that the Americans had brought in. We had Centurions (as well as AMX 13 and Sherman light tanks). Why were the exercises inoculating our troops against armoured attack missing?

Similarly, on @PanzerKiel's point about readiness to face air attack: we are, even today, unprepared for defending against aerial attacks.

Instead of grand field manoeuvres involving large numbers of MBTs, how come we do not practice these aspects? starting from defence against air attacks, and night-fighting, and close coordination with the Air Force?

Grand Slam was only 2 Patton Regt

Even that frazzled the nerves of 15 Kumaon.
 
Possibly the worst defeat in pakistani military history with huge local superiority in armour and artillery,4-5 patton regiments plus chaffees were defeated by a single centurion regiment plus some obsolete shermans and jeeps.AMX were spectators.
 
There was intelligence failure in not having been able to locate the crack 1 AD . That failure led to the initial debacle while trying to attack.

What worries me as an Indian is that there still seems to be an asymmetry in intelligence gathering quantity and quality. It is not at all clear that Indian Military Intelligence knows what it needs to know about the Pakistani order of battle. There have been lots of purchases of surplus and redundant armour from other nations; what are these destined for? Are new units being formed, for instance, on the Pakistan-Afghanistan borders? Are old units being strengthened? Are old units being revived by replacement of what is felt to be less effective?

Certainly professional intelligence gathering will not be reported in the media, but information tends to seep out, and the usual suspects who make a living out of speculative reporting on neighboring military developments would have had tons to say about anything significant that is discovered. Their silence seems to mean that little has been discovered. Or, at the very least, that such discoveries will not make headline or TRP-worthy news.

Possibly the worst defeat in pakistani military history with huge local superiority in armour and artillery,4-5 patton regiments plus chaffees were defeated by a single centurion regiment plus some obsolete shermans and jeeps.AMX were spectators.

Quite right.

What we should worry about is that this was an unexpected defeat, that this went 'against the run of play', so to speak. There was every rational reason to believe that the superior technology would prevail.

Therefore, what is important is to analyse how it happened, not merely what happened.

It is equally important to find out why mountain troops were committed to a battle where their defeat was assured; we cannot afford to forget that the preliminary to this battle was the routing of Indian attacks on the Pakistani positions, on the Ruhi Nulla, and on the Ichhogil Canal.

For that matter, we cannot afford to forget, either, that the aftermath to this 'worst defeat in pakistani military history' was followed by another dismal performance in attacking Pakistani positions in and around Khem Karan and trying to recover these from the same defeated forces that were actually reduced to bolster Pakistani defences in the Sialkot area.

Another cause for concern is the very long passages, 200 kms. at a time, that Indian troops had to traverse to get to battle, that they entered straight out of the trains, without rest, a pause for equipment, or time for briefing or orientation. An armoured team travelled from Ambala to Valtoha, another infantry formation moved from the Himachal hills to the same theatre; these are the weak points that we need to address, as these (the distance between cantonment and battle-field) remain, both on our western flank and on the northern.

@kongn

I hope Indians examining these events will agree that what took place was due to an intention to prevent failures, as much as to produce successes - a policy, in game theory terms, of Minimax, not of Maximin. It sounds faint-hearted, but as @jbgt90 has never tired of pointing out in his rare posts, this was the first of the three major renovations that the Indian military (distinct from the Air Force and from the Navy) underwent.

On a frivolous note, it was, and is, Pakistani policy that followed Maximin. As a pacifist formerly engaged in defence services, my hope is that that will remain so.
 
Last edited:
What worries me as an Indian is that there still seems to be an asymmetry in intelligence gathering quantity and quality. It is not at all clear that Indian Military Intelligence knows what it needs to know about the Pakistani order of battle. There have been lots of purchases of surplus and redundant armour from other nations; what are these destined for? Are new units being formed, for instance, on the Pakistan-Afghanistan borders? Are old units being strengthened? Are old units being revived by replacement of what is felt to be less effective?

Certainly professional intelligence gathering will not be reported in the media, but information tends to seep out, and the usual suspects who make a living out of speculative reporting on neighboring military developments would have had tons to say about anything significant that is discovered. Their silence seems to mean that little has been discovered. Or, at the very least, that such discoveries will not make headline or TRP-worthy news.
That indeed is true it won’t be newsworthy. Moreover I feel our intelligence apparatuses periodically gets complacent and then get caught with pants down. Kargil, 26/11 are just two comes to mind. I feel Joe our country needs to more open regarding military affairs. Or else blunders we don’t know of will keep getting shifted under carpet citing Official Secret Act and National Security.

in game theory terms, of Minimax, not of Maximin. It sounds faint-hearted, but as @jbgt90 has never tired of pointing out in his rare posts, this was the first of the three major renovations that the Indian military (distinct from the Air Force and from the Navy) underwent
Hey joe can you elaborate on this sounds too good to pass up.
 
Hey joe can you elaborate on this sounds too good to pass up.

There are sure to be greater experts in Game Theory than I on the forum. However, in very, very brief, Maximin is the policy of Maximising the Minimum expected gain; Minimax is the opposite, pessimistic policy of Minimising the Maximum loss! The stark difference between unbounded optimism and all-pervasive pessimism.
 

Back
Top Bottom