India deploys 36,000 extra troops on Chinese border

[Chinese-Dragon]

Don't think he cares though. As one of your countryman has said, don't take internet too seriously!

You're right I suppose.

 

[topjumper]

You seem to be woken up after a hibernation.

This is the second post by an Indian.




And this the third post of the thread by a Chinese and thanked by scores of Chinese.



Shed off the self-righteousness already, it's get annoying after a while!

I'm sure you are smart enough to know that I don't agree with everything that every chinese member has said, and my comments are directed at certain Indian members, so don't impose someone else's comments on me and accuse me for being self-righteousness, that's how a debate degrades to a trolling contest. You can feel free to constantly jump between threads and switch the debate topics to make you (or India) appear to be some kind of "victim", but my view has been consistent and I stand by it.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

He wanted our entire race to be wiped out, eventually.

Did he really say that?

P.S. If you look at that infrastructure thread, you'll see that not one single Chinese poster agreed with Speeder2's "IQ argument".

 

[justanobserver]

I'm sure you are smart enough to know that I don't agree with everything that every chinese member has said, so don't impose someone else's comments on me and accuse me for being self-righteousness, that's how a debate degrades to a trolling contest. You can feel free to constantly jump between threads and switch the debate topics to make you (or India) appear to be some kind of "victim", but my view has been consistent and I stand by it.

I'm sure you are smart enough to know that I don't agree with everything that every Indian member has said, so don't impose someone else's comments on me and accuse me for being self-righteousness, that's how a debate degrades to a trolling contest.

You can feel free to constantly jump between threads and switch the debate topics to make you (or China) appear to be some kind of "victim", but my view has been consistent and I stand by it.

 

[Speeder 2]

But Speeder2 isn't

Well, I 've only engaged in legitimate civil arguments which are non-personal, without either name-callings or trolling, unlike some of Indians here as they still do quite frequently.

Some more bans are needed IMO.

 

[Speeder 2]

That guy is quite a fun. He went something like this -

yo, look at that white supremacist forum how they are racists to Indians, we should learn from them and be racist! Hell ya, I'm a racist from today!

Without realizing the reasons behind a melanin-challenged guy being racist to Indians are applicable to Chinese as well. Seems the genetically superior IQ that was bestowed on him by mother nature is at work!

Where did I say that?

Are you deliberately flaming with outright lies AND name calling? No surprise then.

Your neck would likely be the next in line.

Post reported.


Hasta nunca !

 

[LaBong]

I'm sure you are smart enough to know that I don't agree with everything that every chinese member has said, and my comments are directed at certain Indian members, so don't impose someone else's comments on me and accuse me for being self-righteousness, that's how a debate degrades to a trolling contest. You can feel free to constantly jump between threads and switch the debate topics to make you (or India) appear to be some kind of "victim", but my view has been consistent and I stand by it.

Not sure of the reason behind you keep painting some Indian's pov as that of all Indians when you don't want same treatment to be applied to you as well.

As far as I'm concerned, I usually avoid China related threads as plague. Some Chinese(not all) are just too arrogant to talk with, there is term in my native tongue for them - 'Hothat Borolok', spare me the translation.

 

[topjumper]

I'm sure you are smart enough to know that I don't agree with everything that every Indian member has said, so don't impose someone else's comments on me and accuse me for being self-righteousness, that's how a debate degrades to a trolling contest.

You can feel free to constantly jump between threads and switch the debate topics to make you (or China) appear to be some kind of "victim", but my view has been consistent and I stand by it.

lol... Smart plagiarism that would have worked, but you are evidently suggesting me for constantly switching debate topics and mis-quoting someone else's comments, can you back it up?

 

[topjumper]

Not sure the reason behind you keep painting some Indian's pov as that of all Indians when you don't want same treatment to be applied to you as well.

As far as I'm concerned, I usually avoid China related threads as plague. Some Chinese(not all) are just too arrogant to talk with, there is term in my native tongue for them - 'Hothat Borolok', spare me the translation.

Evidence??

 

[Abhishek_]

Funny how some people take the internet so seriously.

coming from you CS??

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Not sure the reason behind you keep painting some Indian's pov as that of all Indians when you don't want same treatment to be applied to you as well.

As far as I'm concerned, I usually avoid China related threads as plague. Some Chinese(not all) are just too arrogant to talk with, there is term in my native tongue for them - 'Hothat Borolok', spare me the translation.

Thank you for saying "some" and not all.

It is a sad indictment of this entire forum, that I am actually relieved when people don't generalize.

 

[LaBong]

Evidence??

read your posts about how indians perceive chinese as weak and etc etc.

 

[Capt.Popeye]

Thank you for saying "some" and not all.

It is a sad indictment of this entire forum, that I am actually relieved when people don't generalize.

Hi Chinese-Dragon,
Did the mayhem here surprise you? It has happened earlier (both you and i know it) and will continue.
So. IMO its better to be a detached observer than to be trapped in some Maya-Jaal.

 

[LaBong]

Did he really say that?

P.S. If you look at that infrastructure thread, you'll see that not one single Chinese poster agreed with Speeder2's "IQ argument".

He was advocating some posts from stormfront, which asks for wiping the stinky Indians off the earth.

 

[justanobserver]

but you are evidently suggesting me for constantly switching debate topics and mis-quoting someone else's comments

Isn't that exactly what you did just now?

I wrote my post wrt to your response to Abir, I was showing you a mirror (you painting all Indian's povs as Indian and going after Jackdaws but ignoring Speeder).

Anyways this is getting too personal for my taste, bye