What's new

Do the brits still hate the indian hindus?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am glad that Churchill criticised my fellow Hindus.

After all a tyrant dictator will criticise and hate (and also fear) those who oppose him bravely.

We fought his type and kicked him out of the country

But yes of course Churchill praised those who kissed his backside. You know who you are. Lol.

People quoting fat a$$ churchill should know his real worth in todays British population. If they feel Hindu care for what other have to say about us good luck to them.. Hindus have moved on from own weakest point in History.. I see revival of pagan tradition in Europe once again..
 
As a Jat, i dont get your point. Brahmin in our villages are totally dependent upon other community to help them out. Some have succeeded in life just like Jats have. Else we have social fabric where everyone is depended uupon each other.

It is always amusing to me when Pakistanis bring up the role of Brahmins whenever they talk about Hindus. I always wonder if they are really ignoramuses or acting to be one. In South India where I come from Brahmin population is so small they are irrelevant politically. It is Vanniyars, Goudas, Reddys, Kapus, Kammas, Nairs, Nadars etc who call the shots and Hinduism thrives in South India.
 
I am glad that Churchill criticised my fellow Hindus.

After all a tyrant dictator will criticise and hate (and also fear) those who oppose him bravely.

We fought his type and kicked him out of the country

But yes of course Churchill praised those who kissed his backside. You know who you are. Lol.
you talking about the Hindu bureaucracy without whom there was no way a colony could have functioned for one day or the battalions upon battalions of Sikhs dedicated to beat up Pashtuns and others who opposed the British rule on their land through declaring Jihad thus were called savages, barbarians and are still being looked down upon by y'all as savages to this day?
 
you talking about the Hindu bureaucracy without whom there was no way a colony could have functioned for one day or the battalions upon battalions of Sikhs dedicated to beat up Pashtuns and others who opposed the British rule on their land through declaring Jihad thus were called savages, barbarians and are still being looked down upon by y'all as savages to this day?

Good points. There are lots of nuances if we get into it. It makes for a fascinating debate and I’m sure you will have very valid points I can learn from, and hopefully vice versa. For example - who really won the Independence struggle and who were mostly collaborators?

But my argument in THIS instance was very straightforward.

I have’nt mentioned anyone else, in a religious or ethno-cultural context. My point was only against those simple (possibly immature) people who take their validation from foreigners who hated all of us anyway.
Hence OP’s ridiculous quotation and claim.
 
It is always amusing to me when Pakistanis bring up the role of Brahmins whenever they talk about Hindus. I always wonder if they are really ignoramuses or acting to be one. In South India where I come from Brahmin population is so small they are irrelevant politically. It is Vanniyars, Goudas, Reddys, Kapus, Kammas, Nairs, Nadars etc who call the shots and Hinduism thrives in South India.
Bhraman don't even hold land in many of the villages in Haryana and poor guys will never get reservation as well..
 
Good points. There are lots of nuances if we get into it. It makes for a fascinating debate and I’m sure you will have very valid points I can learn from, and hopefully vice versa. For example - who really won the Independence struggle and who were mostly collaborators?

But my argument in THIS instance was very straightforward.

I have’nt mentioned anyone else, in a religious or ethno-cultural context. My point was only against those simple (possibly immature) people who take their validation from foreigners who hated all of us anyway.
Hence OP’s ridiculous quotation and claim.

Both Hindus and Muslims have collaborated with the British.
 
Both Hindus and Muslims have collaborated with the British.
Brits never fought any war, they posted locals against each other n support both side with different front.. Churchill hated hindus but loved hindu majority in the army.. in all this gandhi played his own part to recruit for UK army..
 
Both Hindus and Muslims have collaborated with the British.

Of course. Speaking of Hindus: Veer bloody Sarvarkar who is these days being celebrated as a hero by right wing folk in India. Collaborator.

RSS - The historical and philosophical daddies of the current ‘patriotic’ BJP/ Modi government. They literally sold out our freedoms fighters in the 1942 Quit India Movement.
 
Good points. There are lots of nuances if we get into it. It makes for a fascinating debate and I’m sure you will have very valid points I can learn from, and hopefully vice versa. For example - who really won the Independence struggle and who were mostly collaborators?

But my argument in THIS instance was very straightforward.

I have’nt mentioned anyone else, in a religious or ethno-cultural context. My point was only against those simple (possibly immature) people who take their validation from foreigners who hated all of us anyway.
Hence OP’s ridiculous quotation and claim.
Without thinking too much in depth

Gujratis and than maybe Bangalis
Of course. Speaking of Hindus: Veer bloody Sarvarkar who is these days being celebrated as a hero by right wing folk in India. Collaborator.

RSS - The historical and philosophical daddies of the current ‘patriotic’ BJP/ Modi government. They literally sold out our freedoms fighters in the 1942 Quit India Movement.
Religious centered people imo are not cut out to be good nationalists - regardless of religion

But for "appearance" purposes they're very nationalist but the actual doing part they lack
 
Bhraman don't even hold land in many of the villages in Haryana and poor guys will never get reservation as well..

In South India most of the landlords belong to backward castes while the actual labor come from SC/ST. This is the reason why there is always tension between BCs and Dalits.
Of course. Speaking of Hindus: Veer bloody Sarvarkar who is these days being celebrated as a hero by right wing folk in India. Collaborator.

RSS - The historical and philosophical daddies of the current ‘patriotic’ BJP/ Modi government. They literally sold out our freedoms fighters in the 1942 Quit India Movement.

Both Indian Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha were creations of the British. They never fought against the British.
 
Without thinking too much in depth

Gujratis and than maybe Bangalis

One of the ironies of India (IMO only) is that our greatest leaders Gandhi ji and Sardar Patel came from Gujarat, AS did our biggest scoundrels (the current lot) . Bears thinking about.
 
Brits never fought any war, they posted locals against each other n support both side with different front.. Churchill hated hindus but loved hindu majority in the army.. in all this gandhi played his own part to recruit for UK army..

British handled Gandhi with kid gloves while they put sedition charges on the likes of Tilak.
 
In South India most of the landlords belong to backward castes while the actual labor come from SC/ST. This is the reason why there is always tension between BCs and Dalits.


Both Indian Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha were creations of the British. They never fought against the British.

So called heros given to Bharat n Pakistan were all British stooges specially the once carrying title of "SIR".. Ambedhkar Gandhi were part of the same gang as well..
 
So called heros given to Bharat n Pakistan were all British stooges specially the once carrying title of "SIR".. Ambedhkar Gandhi were part of the same gang as well..

Ambedkar's father was a soldier in British Army.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom