What's new

Pakistan wants to join NSG, MCTR, Australia group, Wassenaar Arrangement

rajusri

BANNED
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
790
Reaction score
0
Pakistan wants to join NSG, MCTR, Australia group, Wassenaar Arrangement if the international community recognises it as a nuclear weapons state

:)

Pakistan wants to join Nuclear Suppliers Group – The Express Tribune



Pakistan has offered to join four nuclear export control regimes, including the Nuclear Suppliers Group, if the international community recognises it as a nuclear weapons state, but remains unwilling to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

At a meeting in Islamabad on Thursday, the country’s top political and military leadership said Pakistan wished to be part of global non-proliferation efforts but only if it was accepted as a nuclear weapons state.

“The National Command Authority reiterated Pakistan’s desire to constructively contribute to the realisation of a world free of nuclear weapons and to the goals of non-proliferation on the basis of equality and partnership with the international community,” said a statement issued after the meeting.

Chaired by Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, the meeting was attended by all services chiefs and the head of the Strategic Plans Division (SPD), an institution that manages the nuclear infrastructure and deals with its safety.

The vaguely-drafted statement by the prime minister’s office said Pakistan was “keen to join four export control arrangements” without giving any specific details.

Foreign Office spokeswoman Tehmina Janjua later told The Express Tribune that Pakistan was willing to join four ‘technology cartels’ that control the international trade of nuclear and missile technologies: the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), the Australia and the Wassenaar groups.

The MTCR and the NSG deal with the international trade of missile and nuclear technologies while the Australia and the Wassenaar groups manage trade in conventional small weapons and various materials used in the manufacturing of arms respectively.

Janjua said Pakistan’s ‘principled’ position on Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) was the same. About NPT, she added that Islamabad considered it as a ‘discriminatory’ arrangement and will not sign the CTBT unless the United States and India do the same.

Power generation

As part of the energy security strategy, the NCA reviewed and approved the Nuclear Power Programme 2050, a plan to use nuclear energy to meet the existing electricity shortfalls and to respond to the future requirements of a growing population and economy.

The NCA also approved the Space Programme 2040, the statement added, though it did not specify any further details about the programme.

Nuclear safety

The meeting appeared to be playing down what it referred to as ‘hyped’ international fears about the safety and security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal. However, the prime minister did admit there were ‘concerns’ after a secret American raid inside the country to kill Osama bin Laden and a subsequent militant attack on a Karachi naval facility.

But Gilani said that ‘campaigns’ of foreign entities casting doubts over the safety of the country’s nuclear arsenal would never stop Pakistan from seeking a minimum deterrence and pursuing a strategic programme.

According to the statement, the NCA expressed satisfaction at the security and safety of Pakistan’s strategic programmes and facilities. It also expressed confidence in the operational readiness of Pakistan’s strategic weapons.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 15th, 2011.
 
Contradictory wishes. One hand 'nuclear weapon state' other hand agreements. Is not that far from reality and ground situation? Or this because India is in talk to join all these groups and that makes it the unofficial nuclear weapons state?
 
This is why pakistan being the laughing stock in the world. Aspiration is different thing than having the ability. Bizzare statement...

But to be fair, if the US had not cut out a special one off waiver......anyway, how is that whole thing coming along?
 
Some Indian friends it seems have taken a theka - they got a waiver and no one else should - Anyway, I really don't understand the defensiveness of some Indian friends -- why would they not want Pakistan in the NSG? The NSG have made it clear to the Indian that NPT must be signed before reprocessing technology can be transferred - and the Indian position is that NPT is discriminatory, so why take issue with Pakistan??

India should be supporters of Pakistan in NSG - in the long run, India must come to terms with Pakistan, and vice versa - it's the only way out of the south asian cage India finds herself in -- See "Caged Bird Sings" on this board
 
Have the numbers of Indian nuclear warheads reduced in the last few years or increased? If increased, why point fingers at Pakistan, it makes you out to be hypocritical

And you say India got a waiver on merits - but reality is that the US engineered it -- and that's a merit of a sorts.

And when internal problems are highlighted, be careful, India is armpit, you know it and we know and the world knows it - lest not get into a who is more of armpit contest, there will be no winners -

I think the more important issues are what are chances of this Pakistani application, who or which countries, if any will support such a dialogue?
 
Have the numbers of Indian nuclear warheads reduced in the last few years or increased? If increased, why point fingers at Pakistan, it makes you out to be hypocritical

And you say India got a waiver on merits - but reality is that the US engineered it -- and that's a merit of a sorts.

And when internal problems are highlighted, be careful, India is armpit, you know it and we know and the world knows it - lest not get into a who is more of armpit contest, there will be no winners -

I think the more important issues are what are chances of this Pakistani application, who or which countries, if any will support such a dialogue?

Far away from ground realities and facts. Even china didn't oppose our membership, This substantiate our claim.
 
Its not a barathi pain buddy with the growing issues and internal affires worsening in your country, it becomes a global issue. Its basically wrong in the first place to you guys to have nuclear weapons. no country which has WMD has ever revealed its design and secrets to another but your country is an exception.
and if you really are interested in joining the NSG, give me one good reason for your intension, considering your last few years of doubling your WMD stock pile

Why should we give you the reason? Who the hell do you think you are? Pakistan is a nuclear weapons state and we are under no obligation to limit our number of warheads. India is also doing the same and more so when once its starts getting nuclear fuel for its reactors, it can spare all its own fuel for weapons. That puts us in a serious disadvantage, add to that the severe electricity shortage that we are facing, we have every right to tell the world not to be discriminatory when it comes to Pakistan.
 
Have the numbers of Indian nuclear warheads reduced in the last few years or increased? If increased, why point fingers at Pakistan, it makes you out to be hypocritical

And you say India got a waiver on merits - but reality is that the US engineered it -- and that's a merit of a sorts.

And when internal problems are highlighted, be careful, India is armpit, you know it and we know and the world knows it - lest not get into a who is more of armpit contest, there will be no winners -

I think the more important issues are what are chances of this Pakistani application, who or which countries, if any will support such a dialogue?

No one in the world is concerned about the Nuclear Weapons stock pile India has but for Pakistan the situation is different, every one is concerened and people like mirage 5000 make the condition worse for your country, adding war heads to your arsenal is not a deterent but is a way to destroy, your government knows that using one of your WMD will result in a MAD so why are you stockpiling it up when you know that you are not going to use it any way.

and about the number of Warheads we have no one has a info if it has increased or decreased or is it maintained at its current level for the last few years. if it had increased we are really opposing any such move.
 
Certainly there is a valid point about the security of Pakistani nuclear assets - but recall US nuclear cruise missiles were mislaid, loaded on aircraft - so while one can understand the academic value of media critiques, real world, is different.

And we must not imagine that media are the totality of concerns of real people who inhabit worlds, not made by the media
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom