'After 2001 Parliament attack, India deployed nuclear missiles on border'

[Dalai Lama]

Stop making yourself out to be something your not, because India does not scare Pakistan.

You sure about that? Because all this shouting about how you're not scared seems to suggest something else.

 

[Rafi]

English please

 

[Secur]

funny you say that yet you use there No-Dong 1 missiles and adding another liquid fuel stage of the same design is improving it? well i guess that is for your standards since you guys could not design one by yourselves


dude its simple logic India is a bigger country than Pakistan we would not even need to use half of our stockpile to wipe you guys out whereas you would need to use your entire stockpile to just maim us its your own media don't get mad at me for what they say

Only if it was that easy to acquire a missile and later keep adding stages to it and if they are only adding stages instead of a completely new design ( accepting just for the sake of argument ) doesn't it require modification and fine tuning of the previous design ? Just compare the specs of the Ghauri II and Shaheen II with Nodong 1 ... and what are Babur , Ra'ad and Nasr copy of ? Maybe you will say that they were developed after removing some stages from it ... You dont know **** about missiles and their development and you come here and debate with us ... Pathetic really

and yeah you can keep your other half stockpile for your successor state because there will be no India and Pakistan after the nuclear war ... We both have enough missiles to turn the Subcontinent into a nuclear wasteland ... More or less doesn't matter if its a mutually assured destruction and even then Pakistani nuclear stockpile is larger than that of India's ... Do try to understand things before posting silly rubbish already-debunked old crap

 

[notorious_eagle]

funny you say that yet you use there No-Dong 1 missiles and adding another liquid fuel stage of the same design is improving it? well i guess that is for your standards since you guys could not design one by yourselves

How about improving its accuracy, reliability and operational status. Seems to me that you are pretending to be an expert on Pakistan's missiles but you dont know jack sh** on what is going on. If you think that Pakistan is still using the same missiles from a decade ago, thats even better news for us.

dude its simple logic India is a bigger country than Pakistan we would not even need to use half of our stockpile to wipe you guys out whereas you would need to use your entire stockpile to just maim us its your own media don't get mad at me for what they say

Indeed it is simple logic, both nations have enough weapons to wipe each other off the face of the earth.

You sure about that? Because all this shouting about how you're not scared seems to suggest something else.

All the shouting in proving how scary you are makes you look even more pathetic, you never tell your adversary that he should fear you, thats plain pathetic. Actions speak louder than words and the past 2 times it certainly was not Pakistan that got scared from a battle .

 

[Abingdonboy]

I never believed in the No First Use policy by India anyways.

The brilliance of India's "no first use" policy is that it can interpret such an attack as 2001/ 26/11 as initial attacks so that a nuclear strike would be realitory to this and still not a first strike.

 

[Windjammer]

Yea!in the mean time Mighty pakistan were Calling UNCLE WANG,MR SHEKIHS,UNCLE SAM and UNCLE BLAIR to save from Indian army in border,I mean you were so much scared without a single bullet fired ..

http://ndtv.com/article/india/post-26-11-condoleezza-panicked-when-she-couldnt-reach-pranab-144754

No prizes for guessing where you pulled that out from..... for almost a year, your army after initiating the deployment, ***** footed on the borders.....we didn't need to fire a single bullet since your jittery and reckless soldiers were driving and blowing themselves up on the very minefields they laid.......more over even after your unilateral withdraw, Pakistani forces remained in their positions for a further fortnight......detonators fitted and all.

 

[Hobo1]

No prizes for guessing where you pulled that out from..... for almost a year, your army after initiating the deployment, ***** footed on the borders.....we didn't need to fire a single bullet since your jittery and reckless soldiers were driving and blowing themselves up on the very minefields they laid.......more over even after your unilateral withdraw, Pakistani forces remained in their positions for a further fortnight......detonators fitted and all.

Indian Army has defeated PA thrice so why would they jittery facing PA.what had india got to loose in depolying forces on its border, the cost of depolyment was too much for Pak economy to sustain that's why it was Pakistan which was jittery. PAF without any BVR capability was no match for Indian Air Force.
IA owing to recent parliment attack and previous track record was sufficently motivated , PA had all reason beside economic for being nervous , they very well knew how Mushraf had abadoned hundreds of soldiers at the icy cold peaks of kargil in 99.

According to wiki leaks.
After Parliament attack, Pak feared war, sought help]

The Pakistan government sought the intervention of Gulf countries to “bring India back on the negotiating table” and prevent a war after the stand-off between the two neighbours following the Parliament attack in 2001, reveals a confidential cable released by WikiLeaks.
“On June 4, veteran Pakistani diplomat Wasim Sajad visited King Abdullah to discuss the Kashmir crisis and requested that the King use his ‘good office’ to convey to governments around the world the need for India to ‘come back to the negotiating table’,” the cable reads.

 

[Secur]

According to wiki leaks.
After Parliament attack, Pak feared war, sought help]

Yeah , Pakistan didn't want war because unlike its foolish neighbor , It was perfectly aware what does a war between two nuclear states result into ?

Mutual assured destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mutual Assured Destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would effectively result in the complete, utter and irrevocable annihilation of both the attacker and the defender,[1]

But nevertheless ready to retaliate if attacked as General Musharraf said

BBC News - Timeline: Pakistan
2002 May - Pakistan test fires three medium-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, amid rumours of impending conflict with India. President Musharraf says Pakistan does not want war, but is ready to respond with full force if attacked.

 

[illusion8]

Yeah , Pakistan didn't want war because unlike its foolish neighbor , It was perfectly aware what does a war between two nuclear states result into ?

Mutual assured destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mutual Assured Destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would effectively result in the complete, utter and irrevocable annihilation of both the attacker and the defender,[1]

But nevertheless ready to retaliate if attacked as General Musharraf said

BBC News - Timeline: Pakistan
2002 May - Pakistan test fires three medium-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, amid rumours of impending conflict with India. President Musharraf says Pakistan does not want war, but is ready to respond with full force if attacked.

I hope the mod is reading this

 

[Hobo1]

Yeah , Pakistan didn't want war because unlike its foolish neighbor , It was perfectly aware what does a war between two nuclear states result into ?

Mutual assured destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mutual Assured Destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would effectively result in the complete, utter and irrevocable annihilation of both the attacker and the defender,[1]



BBC News - Timeline: Pakistan
2002 May - Pakistan test fires three medium-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, amid rumours of impending conflict with India. President Musharraf says Pakistan does not want war, but is ready to respond with full force if attacked.

Nothing can be stupiders than this, first you send terrorist to attack our Parliament then u complain that India is being aggressive when we deploy our forces.

 

[Windjammer]

Indian Army has defeated PA thrice so why would they jittery facing PA.what had india got to loose in depolying forces on its border, the cost of depolyment was too much for Pak economy to sustain that's why it was Pakistan which was jittery. PAF without any BVR capability was no match for Indian Air Force.
IA owing to recent parliment attack and previous track record was sufficently motivated , PA had all reason beside economic for being nervous , they very well knew how Mushraf had abadoned hundreds of soldiers at the icy cold peaks of kargil in 99.

According to wiki leaks.
After Parliament attack, Pak feared war, sought help]

Tall talk and cheap banter doesn't cost a dime......what stopped India from mounting an attack instead of just lingering on the border for twelve months, and then after several hundred non combat casualties, unilaterally pulling back in a humiliating manner. !!

 

[Lord Of Gondor]

unilaterally pulling back in a humiliating manner. !!

Why is it humiliating??
Because we refused to escalate tensions?

 

[Laughing_soldier]

your own scientists said that the indian nuke tests were a fizzle and failed?

Person with poor knowledge and a idiot cannot understand anything till he is feed by spoon. Listen, Only one scientist said that about hydrogen bomb and he said this during India-US nuclear deal because he wanted India not to sign the deal. You cannot even think what is a hydrogen bomb. India first tested nuke in 1974.

 

[Rafi]

Person with poor knowledge and a idiot cannot understand anything till he is feed by spoon. Listen, Only one scientist said that about hydrogen bomb and he said this during India-US nuclear deal because he wanted India not to sign the deal. You cannot even think what is a hydrogen bomb. India first tested nuke in 1974.

It is widely reported even within india that the H bomb test was a failure.

 

[lem34]

Person with poor knowledge and a idiot cannot understand anything till he is feed by spoon. Listen, Only one scientist said that about hydrogen bomb and he said this during India-US nuclear deal because he wanted India not to sign the deal. You cannot even think what is a hydrogen bomb. India first tested nuke in 1974.

How many scientists do you want to say it was a failure?

---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:32 PM ----------

Tall talk and cheap banter doesn't cost a dime......!!

Well they did it cos it was cheap lol

---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 PM ----------

Why is it humiliating??
Because we refused to escalate tensions?

But you escalated them in the first place