What's new

India must covertly target terrorists like Hafiz Saeed

The difference is after 9/11 and London Bombings, US or UK had no such incidents , while India faces terrorist attacks at regular intervals.

Thats the short comings of of security forces, we have internal support to Pakistan based terrorist groups as well. This vulnerability to terrorism will continue, best option is covert offense, i agree somewhat with the article. The perpetrators need a taste of their own medicine and blaming RAW and putting them on the docks is not the way. A free hand is the most feasible option.

Create terror among terrorists and a fear of repercussions.
 
So after cold start, surgical strikes and hot pursuits, the new terminology, "Covertly targeted operation" must look good in the "Bharti banter text".......lest you realise, India can never be Israel and Pakistan in no way is Palestine.
But i guess it's all good to keep the home folks intoxicated.
 
first...prove him terorrist

The sad thing is, since 9/11, no powerful country in the world really needs to prove anything anymore! Just look at what the US, Israel and for sure other countries already does. Spies killing people in public, civilians from all over the world will be kidnapped and taken to countries that allow torture, even if there is no evidence that he has anything to do with terrorists. They will be imprisoned without even basic human rights and contrary to the own laws of these free and democratic countries and the newst way to get rid of people are the drone attacks, that are quieter and cheaper than a war. The public in your own country of doesn't even know that it happened, how many collateral damage it caused or if the target was a real terrorist or not, because there was never any real charge against him or any public trial with laws and the death penalty comes directly and before you even know it.

Bush started 2 wars allegedly to catch Bin Laden and destry Al Kaida and badly failed. Obama stops/will stop the wars and increased drone and intelligence attacks and finished what Bush initially wanted in hardly 4 years and with way less casualties, the problem is, he follows the same policy that the government can do what it wants and nobody don't have to justify their actions to nobody, not even to their own laws and courts.
It's difficult to say which of these ways is the better one, but this seems to be the new way that certain governments have found to fight the war on terror and a country like India will have to think about this way too!
 
but still india will never punish narinder modi and neither samjhota express bombing terrorists?

keeping the national security at risk because of conspiracy theories that some mobile phone shop owners from across the border will kill indians will the entire gang of hindu extremists run free?
 
So after cold start, surgical strikes and hot pursuits, the new terminology, "Covertly targeted operation" must look good in the "Bharti banter text".......lest you realise, India can never be Israel and Pakistan in no way is Palestine.
But i guess it's all good to keep the home folks intoxicated.

If you are comparing then lets say US is Israel and Pakistan is Palestine. How immature.
 
If you are comparing then lets say US is Israel and Pakistan is Palestine. How immature.

Pakistan tried to be Israel in 1971 trying to copy Israeli tactics of 1967 war to destroy Egyptian Airforce but all of us know what happened in the last.
 
India quite simply does not have the capability to pull something like this off.

capabilities are created and destroyed....its not something static or finite.

This forum is a a good place to brush up on history and all such similar unending claims.

Getting to grips with reality in in ones own interest.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom