What's new

'Flawed US plan for war with China may spark nuclear strikes'

illusion8

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
12,232
Reaction score
-20
Country
India
Location
India
Washington: The US Government might deny it, but Barack Obama’s former intelligence chief has confirmed China is a principal target of a major US war plan.

The American plan, known as Air-Sea Battle in Washington, is strategically flawed, Australia’s foremost regional defence expert has said. Hugh White said that the plan also risks escalating a US-China struggle to the level of nuclear strikes.

It is also known to have angered the Chinese military, and the confirmation is likely to be viewed with displeasure in Beijing. Admiral Dennis Blair, a straight-talking Asia expert who until 2010 was Obama’s director of national intelligence, provided the confirmation.



When asked about Air-Sea Battle and whether it directly related to China, Admiral Blair said: “I'm not in the Pentagon anymore, so I can't say [what] that [is] in particular, but it doesn't take any classified piece of information to let you know that countries like Iran and China … have taken advantage of technology in terms of submarines and missiles to be able to keep US maritime and air forces at a distance.

According to The Age, as a result, he said, it was the job of US military commanders to ''figure out ways that we can send our forces to conduct military operations despite these sorts of threats''.

Professor White, the author of a just-published book on the US-China relationship is also a strong critic of Air-Sea Battle, which he says has three fundamental problems. 'Firstly, I don't think it will work; second, even if it does work operationally it won't achieve its strategic aims; and thirdly it runs a very strong sense of escalating to a nuclear war,'' White said.

Professor White said the battle plan was also an old 20th century concept that is being repackaged for a 21st century enemy. ''The US has always done sea control in the Pacific, but what's changed? The enemy has changed. And he has a boat, as they say,’ Professor White said. Admiral Blair also believes it is an old strategy that has been repackaged.

''The concept is nothing new; in typical American fashion we often pour the old wine into new bottles with fancy new labels. But the navy and air force co-operating to be able to get to our allies that are within range of Chinese missiles is nothing new, and most Americans expect that to be their job,'' Blair said.

ANI

`Flawed US plan for war with China may spark nuclear strikes`

Looks like Australia doesn't 'want in' the 2nd cold war that's going to happen between the US and China.
 
He should be more specific as to what the Australian defense expert means when it is flawed.
 
He should be more specific as to what the Australian defense expert means when it is flawed.

Looks like "flawed" here implies bringing in Australia against China, which they seem to not like it that much. Seems you'll need to sort out your ally before venturing further.
 
Obama will lose the re-election this time, since Mitt Romney has more fundraising support over him right now. :coffee:
 
Obama will lose the re-election this time, since Mitt Romney has more fundraising support over him right now. :coffee:

Don't matter how much money that fool collects Romney will be destroyed in debates and will lose the elections.
 
Looks like "flawed" here implies bringing in Australia against China, which they seem to not like it that much. Seems you'll need to sort out your ally before venturing further.

Australia's government has already agreed to host a US base, if any Australian believes their country has not already been brought into it, then I urge them to look at the facts again.


As for nuclear strikes, the untested df-21d is an ICBM, hows that for 'may spark nuclear strikes'?
 
It doesn't matter who comes to power in the U.S, they are all immoral warmongers spreading mischief and corruption on earth.

I don't give a damn who is the US President, as long as Obama is out.

Yeah, to swap the US President in every 4 years will be better. :coffee:
 
SOS : India. stay out of it. Americans are coming to make you a launch pad. China is a neighbour which we have so much to learn from and who wants to do business with us. USA got no point involving India.
 
The Air-Sea Battle is designed to bring China to its knees by enforcing a naval-air blockade; China cannot sustain itself for more than 6 months with oil and shipping cut off. It does not involve the land invasion of China, only the bombing of Chinese radar sites, air bases, and naval bases. It will work just like how the US naval blockade of Japan worked.

Unless the Chinese leadership is willing to accept North Korean standard of living, which is always a possibility.
 
The Air-Sea Battle is designed to bring China to its knees by enforcing a naval-air blockade; China cannot sustain itself for more than 6 months with oil and shipping cut off. It does not involve the land invasion of China, only the bombing of Chinese radar sites, air bases, and naval bases. It will work just like how the US naval blockade of Japan worked.

Unless the Chinese leadership is willing to accept North Korean standard of living, which is always a possibility.

The US satellites will be taken out first, we already demonstrated this capability by 2007. :coffee:

BTW, keep trolling, this is your job on this forum.
 
Professor White, the author of a just-published book


Says it all, time and time again we get the same crap. Some retired military/intelligence/janitor from the pentagon writes a book then states in an interview based on no proof that country xxx is going to atack country yyy

Book sales go up the attack never happens and in a month or two the same thing happens again.
 

Back
Top Bottom