What's new

England end 28-year wait for win in India

Areesh

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
45,157
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
As an individual event this torturous Test match will not linger long in the memory, but for what the end result enabled England to achieve will be chronicled as one of the team's finest hours.

By batting out the final day with barely an alarm, largely through a 208-run stand between Jonathan Trott and Ian Bell, who both scored hundreds, England secured their first series win in India for 28 years.

India have significant weaknesses and problems that need to be addressed, but it has been England's excellence over the last three games that has exposed those shortcomings. On the last day in Nagpur it was two batsmen earning redemption for relatively lean years that prevented any late nerves and added to the complete team nature of the performance.

Trott's hundred, his eighth, was his first since March and for Bell, while also being his first hundred in India, it ended an even longer wait for three figures going back to The Oval against this opposition in 2011 at the end of what had threatened to be a low trip for him.

What was really extraordinary, though, is the turnaround, not only from a crushing defeat in Ahmedabad but also from a year that was on the brink of being their worst ever in Test cricket. Throw into the mix controversy surrounding their star batsman and a change of captain before this series and it is one of England's finest achievements. Alastair Cook, who was able to watch contently from the dressing room during the final day, has laid down a high marker for his captaincy career.

India needed a couple of early wickets to send a few tremors through the England camp but they never threatened. The new ball was taken one over into the day without making a jot of difference. Barring a couple of sessions, this has been a Test devoid of excitement and low in the watchability stakes. England, of course, will not care in the slightest about that but pitches like this are far worse that the "result" surfaces that get the ICC twitchy. If it is not marked down the game's priorities are wrong.

However dead the surface, for Trott and Bell there was a job to do in the first session and they did it expertly. There was good intent from the pair in the first half an hour of the day to ensure the lead was soon in excess of 200 and getting out of sight of India.

Trott has played as freely as anyone in the game and twice drove Ravindra Jadeja beautifully through mid-on - or, in the second case, under mid-on as R Ashwin dived over the ball. His leg-side play was wonderfully elegant throughout the innings. He reached his hundred with two boundaries in three balls against Piyush Chawla, a cover drive followed by a trademark flick wide of mid-on, and allowed a little bit of emotion to come through his steely demeanour.

Trott had not reached three figures since the second innings against Sri Lanka in Galle earlier this year, and it was only his second hundred since making 203 against Sri Lanka in Cardiff in May 2011. However, he has continued to chip in, the average has only dipped and not plummeted, and once again England were immensely grateful to their rock-solid No. 3.

It did not look as though he was going to give away the chance to boost his statistics during the afternoon and it came as a surprise when he clipped Ashwin to leg slip shortly before tea, a few runs short of setting a new record fourth-wicket stand for England in India. That mark remains held by Andrew Strauss and Paul Collingwood, who added 214 in Chennai in 2008.

Trott's Warwickshire team-mate, Bell, was equally composed in making his first major contribution of a difficult series, where his frailties in India had been exposed again. Although the situation was comfortable for England by lunch, that was not the case when Bell had come in at 94 for 3 so it was a strong display of character from him. His fifty, just the second he had scored in India, came with a straight drive off Ashwin as the off-side play that makes him so pleasing to watch when in form began to make an appearance.

He was given a life on 75 when Virender Sehwag spilled a catch at slip and he would have been run out for 97 by a direct hit from square leg. For much of the afternoon he eked along at a pace befitting this match, but started using his feet to Jadeja, lofting him for a straight six followed by a slightly scuffed boundary over mid-on.

Bell's series had begun ingloriously when he tried to launch Pragyan Ojha over the top first ball in Ahmedabad only to find mid-off, for which he was heavily, and rightly, criticised. But he is too good a player to shelve the shot. Deep into the final session, shortly before Cook called his men in to put the final stamp on the result, Bell tickled Ashwin down to fine leg from his 293rd delivery. Everything really had come full circle.

India v England, 4th Test, Nagpur, 5th day Report : England end 28-year wait for win in India | Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo

Good work England. Nice Bharati thrashing there.
 
Good, I hate test cricket anyways. About time BCCI makes test cricket obsolete. 20-20 and 50 over games are much more exciting, watching Test cricket... I fall asleep :lazy:
 
the point was india was beaten on its strength. slow spin wickets. support their batsman plus spinners. thanx to monty and swan they took that advantage from them. over all a good series. india was outclassed in every field. (only the first test where india played well) after that this series was nightmare for indian team, and fans.
 
2-1 amounts to rape? Who taught you English?(Or math for that matter) :undecided:

For a team that is famous for not playing well against spin let alone the spinning tracks in asia coupled with 4 frontline spinners india played , a team that was white washed by Pakistan team instead of having a weak batting line up few months ago , a team that hasn't won any test match series in india for last 28 years , a team which got spanking by major asian teams whenever they came to asia

And when that team beats a team recognized for strongest batting line up with high profile batsman, quality spinners and the batsman who can play spin with ease with a margin of 10 wickets, 7 wickets respectively and 4th test without getting bowled out ....then what will you call that ?

Lol when england white washed india in england in all test matches, odis and t20s your commentators and experts were talking big about home conditions advantage and telling what team india will do when eng arrives in india to play test series ...under the light of all these things its an all out rape!!!!!!!!!!
 
the english played far better,they deserved to win.
 
For a team that is famous for not playing well against spin let alone the spinning tracks in asia coupled with 4 frontline spinners india played , a team that was white washed by Pakistan team instead of having a weak batting line up few months ago , a team that hasn't won any test match series in india for last 20 years , a team which got spanking by major asian teams whenever they came to asia

And when that team beats a team recognized for strongest batting line up with high profile batsman, quality spinners and the batsman who can play spin with ease with a margin of 10 wickets, 7 wickets respectively and 4th test without getting bowled ....then what will you call that ?

Lol when england white washed india in england in all test matches, odis and t20s your commentators and experts were talking big about home conditions advantage and telling what team india will do when eng arrives in india to play test series ...om the light of all these things its a all out rape!!!!!!!!!!

Fact remains that it has almost been a decade since we lost a test on home turf and it took the English team almost three decades to achieve this feat. It wasn't a whitewash either with India winning one and drawing the final test. Winning 2-1 isn't seen as complete dominance in any sport, let alone Cricket. Of course, the Indian media sets impossible standards for our team and expects nothing short of winning all the time. I don't think that the Indian team deserves to be called names on account of this particular series.
 
Fact remains that it has almost been a decade since we lost a test on home turf and it took the English team almost three decades to achieve this feat. It wasn't a whitewash either with India winning one and drawing the final test. Winning 2-1 isn't seen as complete dominance in any sport, let alone Cricket. Of course, the Indian media sets impossible standards for our team and expects nothing short of winning all the time. I don't think that the Indian team deserves to be called names on account of this particular series.


4th test was not drawn by india but it was on the effort of eng because they knew they have won the series, india wanted opposite and they tried not to draw ..at the end of the day eng succeeded in what they were trying to achieve in 4th test and india failed ..not only in sports but in all other prospects those who achieve win
 
the english played far better,they deserved to win.

I think it was India's weak bowling attack that allowed English batsmen to score tons. India needs two spinners of the calibre of Kumble and Harbajan and someone potent to augment Sharma in pace. Maybe one or two bowling all rounders are badly needed instead a bulk of batting all rounders.
 

Back
Top Bottom