What's new

Triple talaq: Supreme Court can't interfere in religious freedom, says Muslim Personal Law Board

Soumitra

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jan 11, 2011
Messages
8,415
Reaction score
-17
Country
India
Location
India
Triple talaq: Supreme Court can't interfere in religious freedom, says Muslim Personal Law Board

The Muslim Personal Law Board today told the Supreme Court it cannot interfere with religious freedom of the people during a hearing on the controversial triple talaq issue.

In an affidavit filed before the apex court, the highest decision-making body of the Muslims said the recourse to divorce and subsequent judicial delays may drive husbands to even kill their unwanted wives.

"When serious discords develop in a marriage and the husband wants to get rid of his wife, there are legal compulsions and time-consuming judicial processes. In extreme cases, a husband may resort to illegal criminal ways of getting rid of her by murdering her. In such situations, triple talaq is a better recourse," the statement said.


The affidavit then turns sexist and claims men are stronger. "Marriage is a contract in which both parties are not physically equal. Male is stronger and female is a weaker sex," it says.

The Board said the Muslim personal law were from the holy Quran and Hadith of the Prophet and were not covered by Article 13 of the constitution. Thus it could not be tested on the touchstone of fundamental rights.

The Muslim Personal Law Board said securing separation through courts takes a long time and deters prospects of further marriage. It defended polygamy as a "social practice and need", and not mean to "gratify men's lust".

The Board said Muslim women also have a right to divorce their husbands under the 'khula' practice.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court said it would examine how far it could interfere in Muslim laws, as it heard a plea to end the practice allowing Muslim men to divorce their wives by saying "talaq" three times.

The Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA), one of the petitioners, did a survey last year which showed more than 90 percent of Muslim women want to end the "triple talaq" divorce tradition and polygamy.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...tml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
 
To all Indian members here, I have a question...

So why do people like Subramanian Swamy and others talk about "unified civil law" in context of Muslims?

Are Muslims the only community in India to have their own personal law-code in terms of marriage, divorce, inheritance (?) etc or Hindus/Christians also have their own personal law in these matters?

How is Muslim practice of their personal law different from say Christians in India?

Can somebody please enlighten me in this regard? Thanks


@SamantK @Joe Shearer @gslv mk3
 
Are Muslims the only community in India to have their own personal law-code in terms of marriage, divorce, inheritance (?) etc or Hindus/Christians also have their own personal law in these matters?

How is Muslim practice of their personal law different from say Christians in India?
We are a sham secular country, that is why we have separate laws for religions.
The Hindu Law is based on common law (one marriage, widow remarriage etc) and not Hindu religious law.

In extreme cases, a husband may resort to illegal criminal ways of getting rid of her by murdering her. In such situations, triple talaq is a better recourse
Wonderful.

Marriage is a contract in which both parties are not physically equal. Male is stronger and female is a weaker sex
I see.

The Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA), one of the petitioners, did a survey last year which showed more than 90 percent of Muslim women want to end the "triple talaq" divorce tradition and polygamy
End of story. Ban religious laws. Ride roughshod over religious sentiments, hurt them and ride the road roller over them all.
 
They dont care about religious shit they worry if UCC happens their hegemony over lives of millions will be over,their stupid "courts" will be closed and their importance will be dimnished.
 
To all Indian members here, I have a question...

So why do people like Subramanian Swamy and others talk about "unified civil law" in context of Muslims?

Are Muslims the only community in India to have their own personal law-code in terms of marriage, divorce, inheritance (?) etc or Hindus/Christians also have their own personal law in these matters?

How is Muslim practice of their personal law different from say Christians in India?

Can somebody please enlighten me in this regard? Thanks
This Secular state And In any secular state there can not one law one Community second for others

Multiple marriages for men are a thing of the past. Current Islamic rules forbid such marriages.
There cannot be Anything Islamic in indian constitution
 
This Secular state And In any secular state there can not one law one Community second for others

How is this relevant to my question?!

Stop quoting me if you won't answer the questions I raised
 
How is this relevant to my question?!

Stop quoting me if you won't answer the questions I raised
Hindus has hindu Marriage Act of 1954

But hindus ready to abolish there Personal Law
 
To all Indian members here, I have a question...

So why do people like Subramanian Swamy and others talk about "unified civil law" in context of Muslims?

Are Muslims the only community in India to have their own personal law-code in terms of marriage, divorce, inheritance (?) etc or Hindus/Christians also have their own personal law in these matters?

How is Muslim practice of their personal law different from say Christians in India?

Can somebody please enlighten me in this regard? Thanks


@SamantK @Joe Shearer @gslv mk3

Hindus dont have a concept of a religious personal law. there is not even a standard holy book for the Hindus. There is a general common law that the Hindus follow

Christians have their personal law as do other minorities

It is only the Muslims who cry hoarse whenever personal law or the concept of Uniform Civil Code is brought up
 
Hindus dont have a concept of a religious personal law. there is not even a standard holy book for the Hindus. There is a general common law that the Hindus follow

Christians have their personal law as do other minorities

It is only the Muslims who cry hoarse whenever personal law or the concept of Uniform Civil Code is brought up
For that Matter hinduism is not even religion as per Constitution
 
If triple talaq means injustice to muslim women, then it becomes the business of the Supreme Court. You cannot just marry a woman, bear children through her and leave her for another woman by just uttering triple talaq. That is just not civil.
 
For that Matter hinduism is not even religion as per Constitution
Thats true. It is a way of life not an organized religion.

As a matter of fact there is no holy book which defines Hinduism. (However if you ask the leftists they will claim Manu Smriti is the holy book 90% of the people have not heard of it and dont follow it but the leftists know about it)
 
Thats true. It is a way of life not an organized religion.

As a matter of fact there is no holy book which defines Hinduism. (However if you ask the leftists they will claim Manu Smriti is the holy book 90% of the people have not heard of it and dont follow it but the leftists know about it)
Actually Secular Means Panth Nirpeksh It Has Nothing To do With Dharma

Secular Folks Will Get heart burn When they Search What Is Written on Emblem of Supreme court of India

यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः॥ (Yato dharmas tato jayah) Whence (dharma), thence victory.(Sanskrit)

1000px-Emblem_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_India.svg.png
 

Back
Top Bottom