What's new

BJP to alter Article 35A on permanent residents in J&K?

salimpheku

BANNED
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
1,355
Reaction score
-6
Country
India
Location
Sweden
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...nent-residents-in-jk/articleshow/59936774.cms

NEW DELHI: Away from the attention that Article 370 usually invites, a section of BJP sympathisers are steadily pushing the party's less-noticed promise of altering Article 35A of the Constitution, which empowers the J&K government to define "permanent residents" of the state.

The article enables the state to provide special rights and privileges that permanent residents can enjoy but has been criticised by BJP as a provision that encourages alienation, deepens the concept of a separate identity and creates a political gap between J&K and the rest of India.




Under the Article, state laws have barred non-residents from purchasing land in the state and the issue is in focus with a Kashmiri woman, Charu Wali Khan, recently filing a petition seeking changes in the constitutional provision as she wanted succession rights though she is settled outside the state.
Responding to her plea, the Supreme Court sent notices to the Centre and state last month. The woman has argued that the state's laws, flowing from Article 35A, have disenfranchised her. Advocate General K Venugopal told the bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud that the petition against Article 35A raised "very sensitive" questions that required a "larger debate".

The court referred the matter to a three-judge bench and has set a six-week deadline for final disposal. The bench is likely to deliver its verdict in September first week. Union minister Jitendra Singh said that since the matter was sub judice, one should wait for the court's verdict. He said the court verdict would be binding on all. State BJP leaders are vocal about their views as they strongly feel that Article 35A should be repealed.




"Article 35A is a constitutional mistake. It was incorporated through a presidential order and not through the parliamentary process,"claimed Surinder Amabardar, BJP MLC from the state. The Centre's stance seeking a "larger debate" set off alarm bells among a section of politicians in the Kashmir valley, prompting CM Mehbooba Mufti's outburst during the Foundation Day celebrations of her PDP party. She asserted Article 35A should not be tinkered with, saying there would be no one to hold the tricolour if provisions regarding special status to J&K residents were altered.
 
"Article 35A is a constitutional mistake. It was incorporated through a presidential order and not through the parliamentary process,"claimed Surinder Amabardar, BJP MLC from the state. The Centre's stance seeking a "larger debate" set off alarm bells among a section of politicians in the Kashmir valley, prompting CM Mehbooba Mufti's outburst during the Foundation Day celebrations of her PDP party. She asserted Article 35A should not be tinkered with, saying there would be no one to hold the tricolour if provisions regarding special status to J&K residents were altered.
Then again BJP side with this Mehbooba Mufti.
Some sort of Political game eh!
 
About time to take this action.
 
BJP is not with Mufti.
They are using Mufti to do what they want.
With no Yield. She still protects the Geelani gang. You see, the only solution is abolishing article 370. Now that BJP is slowly reaching Majority in Rajya Sabha, and President and VP are both BJP members. What better time they want?
I don't like this political game. It's frustrating and infuriating. The only action I see happening in J&K is the defense forces who are doing good job in exterminating terrorists.
 
It's our integral territory. We can do anything we want there.
 
Here is all you want to know about Article 35A

1. Article 35A is a provision in the Constitution that empowers the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to define permanent residents of the state. It was added through the Constitution(Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954, issued under Article 370, according to IE report.

2. The Jammu and Kashmir Constitution was adopted on November 17, 1956. It had defined a Permanent Resident as a person who was a state subject on May 14, 1954, or who has been a resident of the state for 10 years, and has lawfully acquired immovable property in the state, the article.

3. In 2014, an NGO had filed a writ petition seeking the striking down of Article 35A. The case is pending in the Supreme Court.

4. The state government filed a counter-affidavit and sought dismissal of the petition but the central government did not.

5. The Presidential Order of 1954 had provided the framework for the division of powers between Jammu and Kashmir and the Centre under Article 370. If, in the Article 35A case, the Supreme Court strikes down the 1954 Order, it would have serious implications for all subsequent Presidential Orders, according to IE report.

This is a serious issue in the days to come, If there is no war with China!


Let's see what is the member's view? What will be the opposition parties stand?

@SarthakGanguly @padamchen @The_Showstopper @Soumitra @Guynextdoor2 @StraightShooter
 
35-A followed by 370. All these need to be removed from the constitution

I am waiting for the day when BJP has majority in RS. Right now it is the only hurdle against BJP's plans

@padamchen @The_Showstopper @Guynextdoor2 your comments on BJP getting majority in both LS and RS along with majority of the state govts + President, Vice President and PM
 
Removing Article 35 A is the first step to removing Article 370. Godspeed to NaMo. :tup:

Then again BJP side with this Mehbooba Mufti.
Some sort of Political game eh!

What do you mean by BJP "side" with Mufti ? What is this "side" you speak off ?

In the past BJP has also "side" with NC.

Are you saying that only CONgress can "side" with other parties in kashmir ?

Or are you suggesting Political "untouchability" like a bigot ?
 
What do you mean by BJP "side" with Mufti ? What is this "side" you speak off ?

In the past BJP has also "side" with NC.

Are you saying that only CONgress can "side" with other parties in kashmir ?

Or are you suggesting Political "untouchability" like a bigot ?

Eh Go read the news. BJP is ruling the state in coalition with PDP. While, Mehbooba Mufti is blatantly shielding the separatists.

I'm saying when it comes to politics, BJP or congress it's two sides of a coin. Now at least one is slowly fading away, I don't know for how long.

Also, I'm not talking about political untouchability, read again. I'm only talking about the double standards.
 
Eh Go read the news. BJP is ruling the state in coalition with PDP. While, Mehbooba Mufti is blatantly shielding the separatists.

I'm saying when it comes to politics, BJP or congress it's two sides of a coin. Now at least one is slowly fading away, I don't know for how long.

Also, I'm not talking about political untouchability, read again. I'm only talking about the double standards.

Mufti's party has a stated position of shielding the separatists.

BJP as a party has a stated position of being against separatists.

But how is this related to BJP ruling the state in coalition with PDP ?

Same is true for BJP partnership with JD, Shiv sena, Akali Dal, TDP etc.

They are all separate parties with separate point of views about different things. That does not stop anyone from forming a govt. by coming together ins a split mandate. Especially since the CONSTITUTION Of INDIA allows it.


How on earth does this make BJP = CONgress ? :cheesy:

or Modi = Hitler for that matter :lol:


There are no double standards here, only practical politics as permitted under the Law and constitution of India.


Maybe you are stupid enough not to understand this simple reality, but the public of India understands this very well.
 

Back
Top Bottom