Search results

indian based and backed capitalists won. that is it!

SAM Mankeshaw in an interview to karan thapar in 1999 stated he had 8-9 months to prepare and 15:1 superiority! maj. gen. lachmann singh admits that india had already entered East Pakistan on 21 november 1971. .............. thus the East Pakistan garrison that was outnumbered by almost 15 times...

he didnt run and away and stayed as a moral support for his fellows!

saudis only using others...

so who are they gonna use it against? playing games? do the saudis even need forces? 3 rockets are fired on them by houthis and they shout for 34 nation allaince. where was it since 1991 to 2016 for Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Syria?

and what aboout the villages Pakistan captured in 1965? so behave yourself before we are sitting in your village. now dont tell 1971.................. 15:1 (manekshaw) plus 9 months! he cant, he can only yell 1971!!! hah! 15:1 superiority, 9 months and massive casualties! yeh they needed 15:1...

what are those submarines going to be for? :what:

:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:

the dream of muslims reconqouring india again in the current scenerio of no technology and education died out in 1703. pakistan was the correct choice.

indian armry wat an organization! 1948:- nehru rushed to the united nations for a ceasefire. 1965:- shastri after losing the second largest tank battle of the world and 5 hunters in 30 secs went reeling to the UN 1971:- failed to achiev its objectives ie khulna and chittagong, and converted...

splendid!!!!!!!

forget 1965 and 1971 think abt the present. the indian airforce is on a donwfall their squadrons r decreasing from 36 to 32.5! while paf had 26 sqs!

pakistan lost 34 warplanes while india lost 27 over east pakistan and 107 over west pakistan a total of 134 warplanes. ---------- Post added at 03:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:02 PM ---------- for those who r not accepting chuck yeager must come up with solid proofs not their own...

india attacked with 600 tanks (1 st armoured division and 1st armoured brigade) and pakistan only had 5 tanks regiments in the area. so common sense if both the sides had lost 60 tanks each y didnt the indians capture sialkot? zafarwal? shakargargh? wat stopped them? indian losses were no less...

when there were no aircrafts atop east pakistan the propeller-alizes had no problem in buzzin over defenceless east pakistan, had their been a sufficient amount of airforce in east pakistan the alizes wud hav ended in a hash. a starfighter shtdown one alize over west pakistan,the same wud hav...

excellent pictures!!!:pakistan:

good article but can anyone tell me how many indian tanks were exactly destroyed in chawinda? maj.gen.rajinder singh sparrow commander indian 1 armd division accepts 120 wats the pakistani claim?

the isi played the most important role in disietegrating ussr. the isi trained mujahideens, sent thousands of personnels to afghanistan to provide upto the mark latest info on the war for fresh planning, almost the entire planning of war was done by pakistan. america only sent wepons mainly...

good article, the indians used to pressureize pakistan from 1974 till 1987 cuz they had the nuke, attacking siachen and our border outposts in azad kashmir now they r on the complete backfoot since 1987,we opened kargil and finished it at our will and we r still keeping the loc hot,and india...