What's new

As trade deficit rises, EU warned of overreliance on China and Bangladesh for textile imports

Bilal9

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Messages
26,569
Reaction score
9
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States

EU textile and clothing trade reached €200 billion in 2022 for the first time. Clothing imports (+36,6% in value), primarily from China and Bangladesh, surpass the EU's positive export performance to drive this record trade growth. The EU's textiles and clothing trade imbalance rose 48% to €70 billion​

File Photo: TBS
File Photo: TBS

File Photo: TBS

Euratex (European Apparel and Textile Confederation) has noted that EU textile imports rose 36.6% in value terms with a significant amount coming from China and Bangladesh outweighing positive export performance.

As a result, the EU's trade deficit in textiles and clothing has grown to €70b, which is 48% higher than the year before.

The trade body in its 2023 Spring Report said, "Such a growing deficit is a cause for concern; the objective of the EU's Industrial Strategy to strengthen our resilience and "strategic autonomy" is not happening. Instead, our dependency has increased, and becomes critical in certain raw materials and fibres."

The trade body also pointed out that the figures undermine the Commission's goal of promoting and prevailing high-quality, sustainable textile products on the Single Market, regardless of where they were produced. With imports reaching €140 billion, it will be difficult to effectively monitor their quality and compliance. It will be necessary to intensify market surveillance significantly without hindering trade.

In order to rebalance trade relations with the rest of the world, the European Union must also devote more effort to export performance, Euratex suggested.


"EU companies are world leaders in high-end fashion products and in technical textiles. More needs to be done to support their activities in established markets but also emerging economies. For instance, the ongoing FTA negotiations with India should focus on improving market access and ensure "fair" competition with local companies," Euratex said.

The Spring Report from Euratex highlights significant differences in trade-in value and volume. The value of EU textile exports has increased by 13%, but the volume has decreased by nearly 7%. This undoubtedly reflects the extremely high inflation figures from the previous year, which were initially caused by rising energy costs and a shift in central bank policy. This then causes consumer uncertainty, resulting in low demand and gloomy prospects for the entire value chain.

Director General of the trade body Dirk Vantyghem said, "This report confirms once again that textiles are one of the most globalized sectors of the European economy, and hence the importance of taking that global dimension into account when designing EU and national policies. Failing to do so may have a devastating effect on the global competitiveness of the European textile industry."

Looking forward, he added, "It is essential to stabilize inflation, restore consumer confidence and ensure a level playing field for all operators in the textile industry. On that basis, European companies can prosper and offer quality jobs to 1.3 million workers".
 

EU textile and clothing trade reached €200 billion in 2022 for the first time. Clothing imports (+36,6% in value), primarily from China and Bangladesh, surpass the EU's positive export performance to drive this record trade growth. The EU's textiles and clothing trade imbalance rose 48% to €70 billion​

File Photo: TBS
File Photo: TBS

File Photo: TBS

Euratex (European Apparel and Textile Confederation) has noted that EU textile imports rose 36.6% in value terms with a significant amount coming from China and Bangladesh outweighing positive export performance.

As a result, the EU's trade deficit in textiles and clothing has grown to €70b, which is 48% higher than the year before.

The trade body in its 2023 Spring Report said, "Such a growing deficit is a cause for concern; the objective of the EU's Industrial Strategy to strengthen our resilience and "strategic autonomy" is not happening. Instead, our dependency has increased, and becomes critical in certain raw materials and fibres."

The trade body also pointed out that the figures undermine the Commission's goal of promoting and prevailing high-quality, sustainable textile products on the Single Market, regardless of where they were produced. With imports reaching €140 billion, it will be difficult to effectively monitor their quality and compliance. It will be necessary to intensify market surveillance significantly without hindering trade.

In order to rebalance trade relations with the rest of the world, the European Union must also devote more effort to export performance, Euratex suggested.


"EU companies are world leaders in high-end fashion products and in technical textiles. More needs to be done to support their activities in established markets but also emerging economies. For instance, the ongoing FTA negotiations with India should focus on improving market access and ensure "fair" competition with local companies," Euratex said.

The Spring Report from Euratex highlights significant differences in trade-in value and volume. The value of EU textile exports has increased by 13%, but the volume has decreased by nearly 7%. This undoubtedly reflects the extremely high inflation figures from the previous year, which were initially caused by rising energy costs and a shift in central bank policy. This then causes consumer uncertainty, resulting in low demand and gloomy prospects for the entire value chain.

Director General of the trade body Dirk Vantyghem said, "This report confirms once again that textiles are one of the most globalized sectors of the European economy, and hence the importance of taking that global dimension into account when designing EU and national policies. Failing to do so may have a devastating effect on the global competitiveness of the European textile industry."

Looking forward, he added, "It is essential to stabilize inflation, restore consumer confidence and ensure a level playing field for all operators in the textile industry. On that basis, European companies can prosper and offer quality jobs to 1.3 million workers".
Euratex can cry about textile trade deficit all they like. Western retailers and fashion labels are not going to start getting t-shirt and denim made locally all of a sudden. 😆
 
Euratex can cry about textile trade deficit all they like. Western retailers and fashion labels are not going to start getting t-shirt and denim made locally all of a sudden. 😆
Even if they do, the average European won't be able to afford it let alone them having any export potential.
 
Exactly, European sellers are not stupid. They are not going to destroy their supply chain and profit margins out of sheer patriotism.
Unless Euro depreciates, EU will have a tough time being economically competitive with other large and medium sized economies, and thats why demand for goods made in Asia will continue to rise, vice versa won't be true.
 
Europeans should take up 2nd 8-hour jobs working in sewing factories. China should aid a few African entrepreneurs setting up dozens of sewing plantations in Europe hiring white workers. Europe could export the clothes to the US and China to make up the trade deficits.
 
Europeans should take up 2nd 8-hour jobs working in sewing factories. China should aid a few African entrepreneurs setting up dozens of sewing plantations in Europe hiring white workers. Europe could export the clothes to the US and China to make up the trade deficits.
Well. But the Chinese people's opinion is that we should do this in the US first.


 
Euratex can cry about textile trade deficit all they like. Western retailers and fashion labels are not going to start getting t-shirt and denim made locally all of a sudden. 😆

Re-shoring and on-shoring in the textile industry is getting a boost from automation and robots. Fast fashion labels won't re-shore their entire catalogues but denim and t-shirts are low-hanging fruits for automation.

 
Well. But the Chinese people's opinion is that we should do this in the US first.



Plantations were first used in the 13 American colonies and the memories are still fresh after 300 years. It will be poetic justice and new ethnic colonialism. No, humanity will not tolerate the word 'slavery' but, heck, America with its millions of lawyers could come up with socially acceptable words. The bottom line is the setup will satisfy the politically correctness of the hurt, naive European and American psyche. A rose by any other name still smells as sweet.
 

Back
Top Bottom