Vinod2070, I know that your self-esteem is cheaper than your satisfaction from the game of words. I originally wanted to continue playing the game and you, let us look at and try to find where is the yourlowestof self-esteem. It is a more interesting game . but I decided to say something more valuable, listen or not listen in you.
I have had a frank attitude to the Indian members, because I think we may have a deep misunderstanding, so I always answered patiently and carefully all the problems of members of India, as long as your attitude is real. As I said before, use objective approach to communication, allows us to find more common ground than differences in the laissez-faire worthless game. In particular, this divergence is not a true story, just because some people misunderstand, or inconsistent with the responsibility of the laissez-faire. it is not worth it , we will pay more, prices for our problem.
Game can not get any real thing, here is a good example. See the situation in Central and South Asia, the game feels too much, one of the reasons it is important not to curb extremism. A game just to take another game, and who concerned about the true story? If we allow all the games, there would be no good future. For example, Vinod2070 bit overestimating their own game, I am sure, both China and other members of the members will not be a good impression on him. I PDF have a good feeling, so the higher expectations, there can not be a good place for the exchange. is just a place to spread the game. I might expect to be high, without any coercion, all look at our free will, I hope to get more people But the objective value of the discussion, it certainly allows us to find some real things than games.
That is all, may be only a fantasy.
