What's new

Burhan Wani’s killing ‘deplorable’, violates Kashmiris’ rights: Pakistan

It is not we running away, it is you who is not fulfilling its own commitment but bringing unnecessary conditions which ever suits you. World does not run on your fancies..
Bharat mata will remain where she is..it is "Jaan se pyara Pakistan" which is confused...

It is you who is running away. Stop hiding behind words and terms of resolutions. Stop behaving like a delusional fool and accept ground realities of Indian occupied Kashmir. We are not bringing something which is logical and has no clear benefit for Pakistan itself. For vacating some land you need to have some guarantee. Happens everywhere. Happens every time. This is no condition suits us. It suits everyone. It suits India too if it is not willing to run away from plebiscite like it has for past 68 years.

Jaan sai pyara Pakistan is not confused since it is jan sai pyara for Kashmiris too. Hence no deaths in AJK. It is bharat mata who is confused and f*cked in its head and is busy killing civilians in its not so atoot ang. :)
 
It is you who is running away. Stop hiding behind words and terms of resolutions. Stop behaving like a delusional fool and accept ground realities of Indian occupied Kashmir. We are not bringing something which is logical and has no clear benefit for Pakistan itself. For vacating some land you need to have some guarantee. Happens everywhere. Happens every time. This is no condition suits us. It suits everyone. It suits India too if it is not willing to run away from plebiscite like it has for past 68 years.

Jaan sai pyara Pakistan is not confused since it is jan sai pyara for Kashmiris too. Hence no deaths in AJK. It is bharat mata who is confused and f*cked in its head and is busy killing civilians in its not so atoot ang. :)

Either you are fool or very fool. Because words matter in the international agreements. So if Pakistan wants things to be settled as per UN resolution, then they should vacate and hand over the land under its control to India without any pre-condition until you don't trust UN that it would not be able to get its own resolution implemented in full.

Yes, we know how many of your own your have killed in the name of zarb -e-'F*ck'... How many are tortured. How many families are eliminated completely.
 
Either you are fool or very fool. Because words matter in the international agreements. So if Pakistan wants things to be settled as per UN resolution, then they should vacate and hand over the land under its control to India without any pre-condition until you don't trust UN that it would not be able to get its own resolution implemented in full.

Yes, we know how many of your own your have killed in the name of zarb -e-'F*ck'... How many are tortured. How many families are eliminated completely.

Nobody is fool here. You just want to run away from the plebiscite that you promised to Kashmiri people. If land would be vacated it would be given to UN or some third party not India. No chance for it. After committing massacre of Kashmiris India has no moral standing to demand even an inch of AJK from Pakistan. It is not a precondition. It is simple logic. Even Bharat mata should have no problem with it if it doesn't want run away from plebiscite with its tail between its legs.

And yes Zarb e F*clk. Nice name. It definitely f*cked Bharat mata and her plans against Pakistan. I hope the pain on our enemies side is deep. :lol:
 
Nobody is fool here. You just want to run away from the plebiscite that you promised to Kashmiri people. If land would be vacated it would be given to UN or some third party not India.
Exactly, no one in the world is fool to not understand Pakistan's tantrums. If you want UN resolution to be fulfilled, then it will be fulfilled in its entirety and in the same sequence as it is written without any additional clauses. Take it or leave it.
and all those abuses you are bringing here, if not gonna make any difference in India;s stand. We have cut the Pakistan already in pieces, and we will do it again if the need arises. So better you stop fiddling with our own affairs. We have controlled Kashmir, punjab, assam all together in its worst time, so no matter how hard you try, its not gonna change.
 
Indian fail to control IOK with 7 lakh fauji , for Pakistan Kashmir they need to raise at least, another 14 lakh army. Even then grim chances to control....
 
@Areesh , Doesn't matter how many times you get me banned. Reality is, real world is not PDF, nor there are Pakistani mods controlling earth.

I am writing this because i am not genuinely optimistic of PDF future in India or west while openly supporting UN banned individuals.

Thanks.
 
Nobody is fool here. You just want to run away from the plebiscite that you promised to Kashmiri people. If land would be vacated it would be given to UN or some third party not India. No chance for it. After committing massacre of Kashmiris India has no moral standing to demand even an inch of AJK from Pakistan. It is not a precondition. It is simple logic. Even Bharat mata should have no problem with it if it doesn't want run away from plebiscite with its tail between its legs.

And yes Zarb e F*clk. Nice name. It definitely f*cked Bharat mata and her plans against Pakistan. I hope the pain on our enemies side is deep. :lol:





Pakistan mata tried plenty times to capture kashmir never succeeded... am not sure what plans Bharat mata got now... but back 70s, Bharat mata had plans .... and she succeeded... actually we are still holding kashmir which pakistan matador desperately trying to occupy... am not sure who is crying on whom..
 
Exactly, no one in the world is fool to not understand Pakistan's tantrums. If you want UN resolution to be fulfilled, then it will be fulfilled in its entirety and in the same sequence as it is written without any additional clauses. Take it or leave it.
and all those abuses you are bringing here, if not gonna make any difference in India;s stand. We have cut the Pakistan already in pieces, and we will do it again if the need arises. So better you stop fiddling with our own affairs. We have controlled Kashmir, punjab, assam all together in its worst time, so no matter how hard you try, its not gonna change.

Just don't run away from the plebiscite. Pakistan is always ready for any plebiscite since it is sure to win it.

Just stop running please. It is only Pakistan that is interested in UN resolutions with no interest from India since India is an occupier and oppressor busy killing Kashmiris right now. Just stop running and lets hold a plebiscite so that Pakistan can win it. :)

Pakistan mata tried plenty times to capture kashmir never succeeded... am not sure what plans Bharat mata got now... but back 70s, Bharat mata had plans .... and she succeeded... actually we are still holding kashmir which pakistan matador desperately trying to occupy... am not sure who is crying on whom..

Whatever. Right now Bharat mata can't even dream to take back 35% of her so called atoot ang since she is struggling to hold on whatever she has right now. That is the truth. Now let Bharat mata kill more of those kids in Kashmir.

@Areesh , Doesn't matter how many times you get me banned. Reality is, real world is not PDF, nor there are Pakistani mods controlling earth.

I am writing this because i am not genuinely optimistic of PDF future in India or west while openly supporting UN banned individuals.

Thanks.

Good Bye. Go whine about desert culture and wahabis in the sh!thole you live in. Nobody here or in Kashmir is in interested in it.
 
HM designated terrorist organisation originated from Pak.. have 30k recruits, it is expected your sympathy for them....

HM is not a UN designated terrorist organization. Not on the list of US designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) either:

http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm



Can you proof after 2010,UN kept it as "Disputed Territory"???

https://defence.pk/threads/india-cl...unsc-resolution-fo.441379/page-4#post-8514637




The fact that Pakistan gave away a part of Kashmir to China ..

Almost every scholar holds that, to the contrary, it was Pakistan which acquired 750 sq. miles of administered territory.

https://defence.pk/threads/what-we-...-know-the-sino-pak-boundary-agreement.310842/



If you talk abut UN resolution, then first condition for any progress was for Pakistan to vacate without any precondition. Now this is not right. you guys not following UN resolution as well..So bad...you are changing your own stance...



India claims that acceptance of Resolution 47 (1948) was stated by Nehru to be conditional on the withdrawal of Pakistani forces from territory within the 1947 boundaries of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, in accordance with the terms of that Resolution. Pakistani forces have, of course, never been withdrawn.


The factual position is as under:-


(a) The demilitarization of Jammu and Kashmir was to take place in a synchronized manner on both sides of the ceasefire line. It was India which refused to implement the process of demilitarization.


(b) The proof of Indian refusal to demilitarize is to be found in the report of Sir Owen Dixon (an eminent Australian Jurist and United Nations Representative for India and Pakistan) to the Security Council, contained in Document S-1971, in which he concluded as follows:-

"In the end, I became convinced that India’s agreement would never be obtained to demilitarization in any form or to provisions governing the period of plebiscite of any such character, as would in my opinion, permit the plebiscite being conducted in conditions sufficiently guarding against intimidation and other forms of influence and abuse by which the freedom and fairness of the plebiscite might be imperilled."(Para 52 of Document S/1971).


(c) It should also be noted that after a thorough examination of the matter the Security Council in its Resolution No. 98(1952), adopted on 23rd December 1952, allowed both India and Pakistan to maintain a limited number of their forces on each side of the cease-fire line at the end of the period of demilitarization in order to maintain law and order. This number was to be between 3000-6000 armed forces remaining on the Pakistani side and 12000-18000 remaining on the Indian side of the cease-fire line. Pakistan agreed to this proposal; India did not.


(d) To claim, in the face of this clear and irrefutable evidence, that the plebiscite could not be held because Pakistan refused to withdraw its forces, is patently an attempt to deceive the world. The simple truth is that India did not allow the creation of conditions necessary for the holding of a free and fair plebiscite under UN auspices.
 
Almost every scholar holds that, to the contrary, it was Pakistan which acquired 750 sq. miles of administered territory.
Its not about what Pakistan gained or how much it controls. Its about that India claims both Pakistani and Chinese controlled Kashmir, while Pakistan only claims Indian Kashmir. Thats the hypocrisy.
 
Don't be a butthurt bro. Use burnol if it still hurts.

I'm not hurt at all. You're the one that got me banned. A fellow Pakistani, whatever that means to you. Maybe you can get your German and French bro's to provide me some burnol, because obviously we Pakistanis can't produce it. :(

Go ahead and report me again. Whatever.
 

Back
Top Bottom