What's new

China foreign policy grossly misunderstood in the West

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,191
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

China foreign policy grossly misunderstood in the West​

Five things the West gets dangerously wrong about China’s worldview and global ambitions
By TOM HARPER
OCTOBER 3, 2023

National-Peoples-Conderence-2019-e1551687037633.jpg


China’s capacity to surprise Western politicians was demonstrated recently when Chinese leader Xi Jinping was unexpectedly absent from the G20 summit. There were a few reasons why this G20 might have been less important for Xi, including the rising influence of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India and China) partnership.

But often Western reactions to a Chinese decision can come from a lack of understanding of Beijing’s motivations. A deeper knowledge of China would help the West interpret Beijing’s actions more clearly, helpful at a time when many analysts see China as a potential challenger to the US as the dominant world power.

With this in mind, here are five things that the West often gets wrong about Chinese foreign policy.

1. It’s not a grand scheme​

In the Western media, Chinese foreign policy has often been seen as a grand scheme to secure world leadership. Such an image has been popular with Western politicians, such as South Dakota governor Kristi Noem, who claimed that China had a “2000-year plan to destroy the US.”

However, Chinese policy is not quite the labyrinthine plot that it has often been presented as. An example of this can be seen in “Wolf Warrior diplomacy”, which has often been interpreted as a long-term, calculated strategy of Chinese aggression to Western leaders.

But another way of looking at Wolf Warrior diplomacy is as an opportunistic response to the bellicose rhetoric of the former US president Donald Trump’s administration as well as a need to cater to nationalism at home. Showing Chinese leaders “talking tough” to their foreign counterparts also plays well with a domestic audience, and can divert attention from a poorly performing economy.

Equally, grander Chinese initiatives, such as the Belt and the Road Initiative (BRI), which provides aid and finance to African and South American countries to create new infrastructure, may also have been created as a response to outside developments, particularly the US pivot towards expanding its influence in Asia, from 2010.

Chinese foreign policy has largely been devised in response to recent developments rather than being a long-term scheme for domination.

2. China deals with democracies​

Another common fear is that Beijing has encouraged the rise of political authoritarianism in other countries. The Chinese model of economic development has ratcheted up fears of China attempting to spread its political system beyond its national borders.

But, some of the biggest advocates of the China model have been the political elites in developing nations, many of whom have a colonial history, and who appreciate that China offers an alternative to the West in attracting investment.

Overall though, Beijing generally takes a laissez-faire approach towards the internal politics of its partners, with China being willing to deal with democracies and dictatorships, rather than forcing its partners to fall in line with its own political system.

3. China’s role in the world order​

One of the most common depictions of China in recent years has been of it as a revisionist power that seeks to overthrow the liberal rules-based world order and international bodies.

Such an image was popularized by Graham Allison’s 2017 book Destined for War, which warned of a China seeking to overthrow US domination. It presents the China-US relationship as the latest in the long line of great power relationships that follow the same pattern.

However, while China wishes to amend certain areas of the post-Cold War system, most notably it being centered around the US and liberal values, it does not wish to fully overturn the whole system.

For instance, China has played a significant part in established international bodies, such as the United Nations. China was also one of the primary beneficiaries of post-Cold War globalization, with China’s rapid development being achieved partially through this economic model.

4. China’s historical experience​

One of the greatest challenges posed by Chinese foreign policy is that it questions many of the dominant understandings of international relations, which have been grounded in the experiences of the West.

But China draws on a different history, one that includes its own dominant position internationally, but also its defeat and occupation. Beijing references this past when talking of the “Century of Humiliation” (1839-1949), a period when China was dominated and occupied by colonial powers. This powerful image can rally the domestic population as well as build a common cause with developing nations, many of which are former colonies themselves.

China’s golden ages of the Han, Tang and Song dynasties (202BC-1279) have also influenced Chinese thinking. This was a time of huge cultural and economic influence, with Asia trade centered around the Silk Road.

The Silk Road refers to a historical network of highly lucrative trade routes linking a powerful China to the rest of the world, and used to sell its products for centuries. Its ambitions to build a new version of this can be seen in the BRI, which gives China a “new Silk Road.”

It is by understanding the logic behind these legacies that one can see Chinese foreign policy more clearly.

5. The appeal of Chinese aid​

China’s financial aid and investment projects in developing countries are sometimes portrayed as simply bribing corrupt states or ensnaring them with “debt trap diplomacy.”

While these images have been popular in Western media coverage of Chinese foreign policy, they overlook the role of the country receiving aid in choosing to accept Chinese finance and how this also appeals as an alternative to Western aid packages which traditionally come with many conditions relating to governance.

Chinese military leader and strategist Sun Tzu once emphasized the importance of knowing one’s enemies as well as oneself; these words are especially pertinent in understanding China today.

 
Just because the west itself is obssessed with the global domination, they think all other nations must have the same mentality and pursuit. so dumb.
 
In spite of our differences with China, kudos to the rise of all Asian power. At the end of the day, India has to live besides Pakistan, China and our neighourhood.

Finally an Indian recognizes this. There needs to be an Asian superpower, for too long Asia and other continents have been exploited by the imperialist forces of Europe and more recently USA.
 
Finally an Indian recognizes this. There needs to be an Asian superpower, for too long Asia and other continents have been exploited by the imperialist forces of Europe and more recently USA.

Well, many more in India in recognize it. Remember that Indo Indo-China conflict is not cultural, it is territorial.
 
Well, many more in India in recognize it. Remember that Indo Indo-China conflict is not cultural, it is territorial.

Yes, I really think India, China and Japan should resolve their differences somehow. Asia is rising and it is entirely possible that Asia can be as developed as Europe in the next 50 years and therefore can have an EU type of arrangement. This will be a nightmare situation for the west in maintaining their hegemony. Asia needs to put aside differences and unite.
 
Yes, I really think India, China and Japan should resolve their differences somehow. Asia is rising and it is entirely possible that Asia can be as developed as Europe in the next 50 years and therefore can have an EU type of arrangement. This will be a nightmare situation for the west in maintaining their hegemony. Asia needs to put aside differences and unite.

Extremely flawed view of the world

large powers will have differences. they cannot resolve all their differences. they have to manage them without force

India, China and Japan can be at peace. That does not mean they have to fight Europe or USA. they can have different views on relationships with outside powers. United Europe is not in conflict with USA.
 
Extremely flawed view of the world

large powers will have differences. they cannot resolve all their differences. they have to manage them without force

India, China and Japan can be at peace. That does not mean they have to fight Europe or USA. they can have different views on relationships with outside powers. United Europe is not in conflict with USA.
lOL, see who is talking

j7yx2xlvvia51.jpg
 
Extremely flawed view of the world

large powers will have differences. they cannot resolve all their differences. they have to manage them without force
Very important for some in the West to learn that disagreement and even dislike is not equal to enmity or hatred. For example, most Americans dislike metric system; that doesn't mean they hate it. They manage to live with kilograms, meters and liters when traveling abroad though they will never accept it within U.S.
 
Extremely flawed view of the world

large powers will have differences. they cannot resolve all their differences. they have to manage them without force

India, China and Japan can be at peace. That does not mean they have to fight Europe or USA. they can have different views on relationships with outside powers. United Europe is not in conflict with USA.

I disagree.

United Europe is not in conflict with the USA because they are all part of the western civilization. When it comes to "other" great powers, they are actually others for the westerners. There is a civilizational difference outside of the great power co-operation/confrontation. The great powers of one civilization co-operates with a great power of another civilization if there is an interest but when it comes to "us vs them" the civilizational difference comes to fore. They are known as west and we are known as east for a reason.
 
United Europe is not in conflict with USA.
Yes we know NATO is all White, and excludes Mexico and Algeria, both adjacent to Mediterranean, while including eastern european landlocked Hungary.
 
United Europe is not in conflict with the USA because they are all part of the western civilization.
Russia is part of western civilization. What you're talking about is them being all White.
 
Russia is part of western civilization. What you're talking about is them being all White.

Russia is and isn't. Russia is not fully western, they have diverse population. Even if you consider them to be western, the rivalry between US and USSR was in a time when there was no other power in the eastern civilizations.
 
This "good cop" routine by west is about 2024 election and having a smooth run into the election season. You'll see it pick up again post-election. That's why all the US minions are playing it quitely at the moment.
Russia is and isn't. Russia is not fully western, they have diverse population.
In that case all Anglosaxon Unified states, including UK, that seek to control Europe are not fully western because they have diverse populations.
 

Back
Top Bottom