Could this be J-10B ?

[Icarus]

I was just searching about the net when I came across this rather different looking image of the J-10, as it can be seen, the air inlet is not boxish as in the J-10A and changes to the structure of the aircraft are also noticeable, so a question popped in my mind, could this be J-10B ?
One can make out PLAAF markings on the aircraft but fine details are impossible to spot because the picture seems to be too grainy.
J-10A:


J-10(Unknown):

 

[DaRk WaVe]

second pic is Photo Shopped EF

 

[Icarus]

Following is a picture comparing this and a picture of a EF-2000.

 

[Myth_buster_1]

oh no. not another useless thread!

 

[Icarus]

Just wanted to see what others thought about the image.........
I meant no harm or offence.................

 

[Icarus]

second pic is Photo Shopped EF

The load does seem to be identical in both the planes.........

 

[DaRk WaVe]

The load does seem to be identical in both the planes.........

seems the photo shopper forgot to remove Sidewinders

any ways its fake

 

[Icarus]

I also noticed, just a few minutes ago, in the Photo shopped image, the guy who edited it missed one crucial detail, the J-10 fake has two engines, when J-10 has only one...................

 

[Kompromat]

Photoshopped!

Keep your horses tied up , FC-20 would be Much more capable than the current J-10A but wont be a star wars jet , these are the sayings of those who have eveluated it even before anyone else saw this bird.

 

[Kompromat]

We are done , mods please close this thread.

 

[Frankenstein]

The glass frame is very different of j10B, fake picture as everyone said

 

[SU-33]

That's not F10B.
please see the link as follow, this shows J10A pictures of different period in internet

¡¾¼¯Í¼¡¿ÆÆÎíÌÚ¿Õ¿´ÃÍÁú _ »ØÊ×¼ß10ÍøÉÏÀúÊ·×Ù¼£| Ó¥»÷³¤¿Õ - ·ÉÑï¾üÊ ÐñÈÕ³ö¶«·½£¬¾«²ÊÔÚ·ÉÑï - powered by phpwind.net

 

[wangrong]

it is ps pic